Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Center

Decision Date12 April 2007
Docket NumberNo. 06-2318.,06-2318.
Citation481 F.3d 1106
PartiesJennifer MILES, Appellant, v. BELLFONTAINE HABILITATION CENTER, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Jennifer Miles, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Denise Leanne Thomas, and Michael S. Meyers, Asst. Atty. Generals, St. Louis, MO, for appellee.

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Miles (Miles) appeals from the district court's dismissal of her pro se Title VII employment discrimination and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) action against Bellefontaine Habilitation Center (the Center). Upon de novo review, see Atkinson v. Bohn, 91 F.3d 1127, 1128 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam); Thomas v. FAG Bearings Corp., 50 F.3d 502, 504 (8th Cir. 1995), we affirm in part and reverse in part.

The district court properly dismissed with prejudice Miles's FMLA claim, which was brought under FMLA's self-care provisions. As an agency of the state of Missouri, see Mo. Const. art. IV, § 12; Mo.Rev.Stat. § 630.003.1.5, the Center is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from the claim, see Townsel v. Missouri, 233 F.3d 1094, 1096 (8th Cir. 2000), overruled in part by Nev. Dep't of Human Res. v. Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721, 735-37, 123 S.Ct. 1972, 155 L.Ed.2d 953 (2003); cf. Brockman v. Wyo. Dep't of Family Servs., 342 F.3d 1159, 1164, 1165 n. 3 (10th Cir.2003) (construing effect of Hibbs and concluding immunity was not abrogated for self-care under FMLA).

We conclude, however, the district court improperly dismissed Miles's Title VII claim for failure to plead sufficiently she had exhausted her administrative remedies. Miles's complaint needed only to contain a "short and plain statement" establishing the court's jurisdiction and her entitlement to relief. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a). While Miles was required to exhaust her administrative remedies with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) before bringing suit, see Williams v. Little Rock Mun. Water Works, 21 F.3d 218, 222 (8th Cir.1994), failure to exhaust administrative remedies is an affirmative defense that a defendant must prove, see Miller v. Runyon, 32 F.3d 386, 388 (8th Cir.1994). Miles stated in her form complaint she filed a charge with the EEOC concerning the alleged discrimination and retaliation described in her complaint, and she attached a right-to-sue letter the EEOC issued in January 2006. Defendant's motion to dismiss did not challenge this statement. We know of no authority requiring Miles to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
42 cases
  • Bass v. Univ. of Ark. At Pine Bluff
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • September 16, 2014
    ...administrative remedies under Title VII is an affirmative defense that a defendant must prove. Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr., 481 F.3d 1106, 1107 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Further, "[a] claim may not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) or Rule 56 where questions of material fact ......
  • Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 20, 2012
    ...See 626 F.3d 187 (C.A.4 2010) (case below); Nelson v. University of Tex., 535 F.3d 318 (C.A.5 2008) ; Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Center, 481 F.3d 1106 (C.A.8 2007)(per curiam); Toeller v. Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections, 461 F.3d 871 (C.A.7 2006) ; Touvell v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Ret......
  • Kenney v. Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Ark.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • October 30, 2020
    ...of complaint based on university's sovereign immunity from suit under the FMLA self-care provision); Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr., 481 F.3d 1106, 1007 (8th Cir. 2007) (affirming district court's dismissal of plaintiff's FMLA self-care claim since agency of the state was entitled ......
  • Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 20, 2012
    ...See 626 F.3d 187 (C.A.4 2010) (case below); Nelson v. University of Tex., 535 F.3d 318 (C.A.5 2008) ; Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Center, 481 F.3d 1106 (C.A.8 2007)(per curiam); Toeller v. Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections, 461 F.3d 871 (C.A.7 2006) ; Touvell v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Ret......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2016 Part V. Discrimination In Employment
    • July 27, 2016
    ...69 (2d Cir. 2000); Banks v. Court of Common Pleas FJD , 342 Fed.Appx. 818, 821 (3d Cir. 2009); Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr ., 481 F.3d 1106, 1107 (8th Cir. 2007); Batchelor v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 242 Fed.Appx. 652, 653 (11th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (unpub.); Coleman v. Mar......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2016 Part VIII. Selected Litigation Issues
    • July 27, 2016
    ...v. Federated Metals Corp. , 867 S.W.2d 113 (Tex. App.—Austin 1993, no writ), §30:7.B.1 Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr., 481 F.3d 1106, 1107 (8th Cir. 2007), §25:2.D.3 Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. , 497 U.S. 1, 110 S.Ct. 2695 (1990), §§29:2.B.3.c, 29:2.B.3.d Millazzo v. Universal ......
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2014 Part V. Discrimination in employment
    • August 16, 2014
    ...69 (2d Cir. 2000); Banks v. Court of Common Pleas FJD, 342 Fed.Appx. 818, 821 (3d Cir. 2009); Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr., 481 F.3d 1106, 1107 (8th Cir. 2007); Batchelor v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 242 Fed.Appx. 652, 653 (11th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (unpub.); Coleman v. Maryl......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2014 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • August 16, 2014
    ...v. Federated Metals Corp. , 867 S.W.2d 113 (Tex. App.—Austin 1993, no writ), §30:7.B.1 Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr., 481 F.3d 1106, 1107 (8th Cir. 2007), §25:2.D.3 Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. , 497 U.S. 1, 110 S.Ct. 2695 (1990), §§29:2.B.3.c, 29:2.B.3.d Millazzo v. Universal ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT