487 P.2d 711 (Okla. 1971), 43286, Dunn v. Public Service Co. of Okl.

• Docket Number: 43286.
• Date: 20 July 1971
• Citation: 487 P.2d 711
• Parties: Freddie F. DUNN, Plaintiff in Error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, Defendant in Error.
• Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court

Page 711

487 P.2d 711 (Okla. 1971)

Freddie F. DUNN, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, Defendant in Error.

No. 43286.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 20, 1971.

Page 712

Syllabus by the Court

Liability for negligence of the principal employer under the terms of the Workmen's Compensation Act of this State providing compensation for injuries to an employee of an independent contractor performing hazardous work in the course of his employment which was necessarily connected with, and an integral part of the business of the principal employer, is exclusive and such employee is without right to maintain action in tort against the principal employer on account of such injuries. 85 O.S.1961, §§ 11, 12 and 44.

Appeal from the District Court of Tulsa County; Raymond W. Graham, Judge.

Action in tort by Freddie F. Dunn against public Service Company, a domestic corporation, for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Robert P. Kelly, Bruce W. Gambill, Pawhuska, for plaintiff in error.

Robert L. Lawrence, Floyd L. Walker, George A. Farrar, and Walker, Iverson & Farrar, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

DAVISON, Vice Chief Justice.

The plaintiff Freddie F. Dunn filed his action in tort against the defendant Public Service Company of Oklahoma, a domestic corporation, wherein plaintiff prayed for a sizeable amount in damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from the negligent acts of defendant.

The trial court sustained defendant's motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. The interpretation of the facts is the determinative question.

The facts are as follows:

1. The defendant is a public utility company; that it owns electric supply lines within the State; that it generates electricity for sale to its customers; that it repairs and maintains the electric lines owned by it.

2. That the injuries described in plaintiff's petition arose out of and in the course of and within the scope of plaintiff's hazardous employment by L. E. Myers Company.

3. That L. E. Myers was an independent contractor of defendant. The work to be performed was the necessary relocation of existing electric power lines to make way for the construction of Crosstown Expressway in Tulsa, Oklahoma. L. E. Myers had provided a Workmen's Compensation policy covering plaintiff and other workmen employed on the project.

4. That plaintiff's employer L. E. Myers Company was engaged by defendant to move and relocate the electric supply lines; that it was in the course of moving and...