Wellman v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Decision Date | 14 May 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 73-1778.,73-1778. |
Citation | 496 F.2d 131 |
Parties | Roberta R. WELLMAN and Ward W. Wellman, Appellees, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
William P. Sanford, Springfield, Mo., for appellant.
B. H. Clampett, Springfield, Mo., for appellees.
Before GIBSON, BRIGHT and STEHENSON, Circuit Judges.
Appellant-Liberty Mutual Insurance Company wrote a comprehensive combination insurance policy covering both automobile and general liability on its named insured, Morgan Drive-Away, Inc. (Morgan), of Elkhart, Indiana, a common carrier regulated by the Interstate Commerce Commission. On December 19, 1969, a truck leased to Morgan and driven by its owner, Corrie Mitchell, Jr., collided with an automobile driven by Roberta R. Wellman near Lebanon, Missouri, while Mitchell was returning from delivering a load of cargo for Morgan. On this return trip and at the time of the accident, Mitchell was actually hauling a load of freight under contract with a third party, Illinois Machinery Transport, Inc. (IMT),1 without the express knowledge or approval of Morgan.
Mrs. Wellman sustained very severe injuries, including the loss of a leg, as a result of the accident. She and her husband brought an action in the Missouri state courts against Morgan, Mitchell, and IMT. Plaintiffs later dropped their suit against Morgan, but recovered a very substantial default judgment in the sum of $301,971.27 against Mitchell and IMT. Liberty Mutual defended Morgan but not Mitchell or IMT in the state court. Thereafter, the Wellmans brought this proceeding in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, seeking to satisfy the default judgment from proceeds of the liability insurance policies issued by Liberty Mutual to Morgan.2
The district court held that the Liberty Mutual policies afforded coverage both to Mitchell and to IMT and entered judgment for the full amount in favor of the Wellmans. Liberty Mutual brings this timely appeal. Our jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount in controversy.
We have carefully examined the insurance policies here in question and the authorities submitted by appellant. We cannot agree with the district court's conclusion that the policy language includes coverage for Mitchell and IMT under such circumstances as these. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment.
We adopt the following findings of fact by the district court from its unpublished memorandum opinion:
Appellant-Liberty makes the same contentions in this court as it did in the district court, and, additionally, contends that the Wellmans failed to show the reasonableness of the amount of the judgments which were obtained in state court. The crucial issue in this case, however, is whether the insurance policy covers owner-operator, Mitchell and broker-IMT.
The primary Liberty Mutual policy contains two parts. Only Part II is pertinent to our present inquiry.4 Part II, entitled "Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance," specifically relates to the operation of automobiles5 and affords the following liability coverages:
Part II further designates those persons entitled to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America
...expressly extended coverage to the loss and thus should bear financial responsibility for it. Accord, Wellman v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 496 F.2d 131, 139 (8th Cir. 1974) (ICC regulations may not be read into insurance contract to require lessee's insurer to pay judgment against lesso......
-
Paul v. Bogle
...(Me., 1977); Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of New York v. Watson, 216 Va. 807, 810-811, 224 S.E.2d 312 (1976); Wellman v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 496 F.2d 131, 139 (C.A. 8, 1974); Proctor v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc., 494 F.2d 89, 92 (C.A. 4, 1974); Simmons v. King, 478 F.2d......
-
Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
...491 N.E.2d 1006 (Ind.App.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 932, 107 S.Ct. 1571, 94 L.Ed.2d 762 (1987). See also Wellman v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 496 F.2d 131 (8th Cir.1974); Wyckoff Trucking, Inc. v. Marsh Bros. Trucking Serv. Inc., 58 Ohio St.3d 261, 265-66, 569 N.E.2d 1049, 1053 (1991). Esse......
-
Pouliot v. Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.
...Rodriguez v. Ager, 705 F.2d 1229 (10th Cir.1983); White v. Excalibur Ins. Co., 599 F.2d 50 (5th Cir.1979); Wellman v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 496 F.2d 131 (8th Cir.1974); Proctor v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc., 494 F.2d 89 (4th Cir.1974); Simmons v. King, 478 F.2d 857 (5th C......