Novy v. Astrue
Decision Date | 14 August 2007 |
Docket Number | No. 06-3897.,06-3897. |
Citation | 497 F.3d 708 |
Parties | Patricia NOVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Barry A. Schultz (argued), Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Gary A. Sultz (argued), Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before POSNER, COFFEY, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Patricia Novy, age 35, applied unsuccessfully for social security disability benefits. The principal issue and the only one we need discuss involves her claim of being mentally retarded. Her main evidence of retardation is her low IQ-69—though there is also evidence from psychologists and other medical professionals that, as one would expect, she has poor memory, confused thinking, and, as her brief puts it, "marginal ability to navigate social encounters and activities of daily living."
The applicable regulation defines mental retardation as "significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning initially manifested during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22." 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. I, § 12.05. The requirement of early onset and the reference to the claimant's "developmental period" seem intended to limit coverage to an innate condition, Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 948 F.2d 268, 271 (6th Cir.1991), rather than a condition resulting from a disease or accident in adulthood. This condition was forcefully questioned in Tennessee Protection & Advocacy, Inc. v. Wells, 371 F.3d 342, 346-50 (6th Cir.2004), but is in any event satisfied in this case.
If in addition to being retarded within the meaning of the regulation the claimant has an IQ below 60, she is deemed disabled, without more. 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. I, § 12.05(B). But if her IQ is at least 60, she must, in order to establish disability without reference to her age, education, or work experience, demonstrate "a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function." Id., § 12.05(C); see Mendez v. Barnhart, 439 F.3d 360, 361 (7th Cir.2006); Hinkle v. Apfel, 132 F.3d 1349, 1351-52 (10th Cir.1997); Selders v. Sullivan, 914 F.2d 614, 619 (5th Cir.1990) (per curiam). In other words, and critical to Novy's case, a low IQ, but not an IQ below 60, is insufficient, even with the presence of some impairment, to establish disability per se on grounds of mental retardation. The reason is that a person with an IQ in the 60s (or even lower) may still be able to hold a full-time job, Mendez v. Barnhart, supra, 439 F.3d at 361; see Chunn v. Barnhart, 397 F.3d 667, 669 (8th Cir.2005); Banks v. Massanari, 258 F.3d 820, 821-22 (8th Cir.2001); Foster v. Halter, 279 F.3d 348, 355 (6th Cir.2001). Their employment opportunities are of course limited. See, e.g., Paul Wehman, John Bricout & John Kregel, "Supported Employment in 2000: Changing the Locus of Control from Agency to Consumer," in Mental Retardation in the 21st Century 115 ; William E. Kiernan, "Where We Are Now: Perspectives on Employment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bennett v. Colvin, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-00168-CG-N
...See Randall v. Astrue, 570 F.3d 651, 659-60 (5th Cir. 2009); Wall v. Astrue, 561 F.3d 1048, 1062 (10th Cir. 2009); Novy v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 708, 709 (7th Cir. 2007); Maresh v. Barnhart, 438 F.3d 897, 899 (8th Cir. 2006); Foster v. Halter, 279 F.3d 348, 354 (6th Cir. 2001). The Eleventh Circ......
-
Harrell v. Colvin
...See Randall v. Astrue, 570 F.3d 651, 659-60 (5th Cir. 2009); Wall v. Astrue, 561 F.3d 1048, 1062 (10th Cir. 2009); Novy v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 708, 709 (7th Cir. 2007); Maresh v. Barnhart, 438 F.3d 897, 899 (8th Cir. 2006); Foster v. Halter, 279 F.3d 348, 354 (6th Cir. 2001). The Eleventh Circ......
-
Bennett v. Colvin
...to an individual's 'ability to cope with the challenges of ordinary everyday life.'" Talavera, 697 F.3d at 153 (quoting Novy v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 708, 710 (7th Cir. 2007)) (punctuation omitted). The term "refers to the individual's progress in acquiring mental, academic, social and personal ......
-
Trimm v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
...to a plaintiff's "ability to cope with the challenges of ordinary everyday life." Talavera, 697 F.3d at 153 (quoting Novy v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 708, 710 (7th Cir.2007)) (internal alterations omitted). Courts have held that a plaintiff who "is able to satisfactorily navigate activities such as......
-
Table of Cases
...106.3, 106.9, 107.20, 205.10, 210.4, 604.6, 1105.1,1210.12 Novotny v. Chater , 72 F.3d 669, 670 (8th Cir. 1995), § 601.2 Novy v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 708 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2007), 5th-09, 7th-07 Nunley v. Barnhart , 296 F. Supp.2d 702 (W.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2003), § 1208.5 Nunn v. Apfel , No. 97-712......
-
Case Index
...Colvin , 743 F.3d 1118 (7th Cir. Feb. 27, 2014), 7th-14 Newton v. Apfel , 209 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. Apr. 25, 2000), 5th-00 Novy v. Astrue , 497 F.3d 708 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2007), 7th-07 Perez v. Barnhart , 415 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. July 1, 2005), 5th-05 Roddy v. Astrue , 705 F.3d 631 (7th Cir. Ja......
-
Case index
..., 648 F.3d 605 (8 th Cir. Aug. 4, 2011), 8 th -11 Newton v. Apfel , 209 F.3d 448 (5 th Cir. Apr. 25, 2000), 5 th -00 Novy v. Astrue , 497 F.3d 708 (7 th Cir. Aug. 14, 2007), 7 th -07 Perez v. Barnhart , 415 F.3d 457 (5 th Cir. July 1, 2005), 5 th -05 Roddy v. Astrue , 705 F.3d 631 (7 th Cir......
-
Table of cases
...106.3, 106.9, 107.20, 205.10, 210.4, 604.6, 1105.1, 1210.12 Novotny v. Chater , 72 F.3d 669, 670 (8th Cir. 1995), § 601.2 Novy v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 708 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2007), 5th-09, 7th-07 Nunley v. Barnhart , 296 F. Supp.2d 702 (W.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2003), § 1208.5 Nunn v. Apfel , No. 97-71......