Connecticut Educ. Ass'n v. State Bd. of Labor Relations, 3288
Decision Date | 17 September 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 3288,3288 |
Citation | 5 Conn.App. 253,498 A.2d 102 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | , 27 Ed. Law Rep. 1154 CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION et al. v. STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS et al. |
James C. Ferguson, Hartford, for plaintiff Connecticut State Federation of Teachers.
J. Larry Foy, Wethersfield, for named defendant.
Joel M. Ellis, Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was William S. Zeman, West Hartford, for defendant Connecticut State Council of AFSA Locals, AFL-CIO.
Joseph I. Lieberman, Atty. Gen., and Robert W. Garvey and Thomas P. Clifford III, Asst. Attys. Gen., filed a brief as amici curiae.
Before DUPONT, C.P.J., and HULL and DALY, JJ.
This case, which concerns the vital question of the right of displaced administrator unit personnel to bump 1 teacher unit personnel, was reserved on a stipulation under Practice Book §§ 3133 and 3134 for the advice of the Supreme Court by the trial court, Edelberg, J., and was transferred to this court on June 11, 1984. See Practice Book § 3076.
The stipulation provides: "1. The facts upon which the questions arise are as follows:
(a) Whether under the Act Concerning School Board-Teacher Negotiations and the Teacher Tenure Act, it is a mandatory subject of bargaining for the administrators' unit and/or the teachers' unit that members of an administrators' unit whose positions have been eliminated or whose positions have been lost to other administrators, may bump into or be assigned to a position in the teachers' unit, which position (i) is held by a Tenured teacher, (ii) is held by a non-Tenured teacher pursuant to C.G.S. Sec. 10-151(b) or (iii) is unoccupied?
(b) If such a provision were to be negotiated between an administrators' unit and a school board providing for such bumping or (c) If such a provision were to be negotiated between an administrators' unit and a school board providing for such bumping or assignment would it be enforceable if there was an existing provision in the collective bargaining agreement of the teachers' unit prohibiting members of the administrators' unit from bumping members of the teachers' unit or from being assigned to unoccupied positions in the teachers' unit?
assignment would it be enforceable notwithstanding a lack of agreement by the teachers' unit with such provision?
(d) Whether under the Act Concerning School Board-Teacher Negotiations and the Teacher Tenure Act, it is a mandatory subject of bargaining for the administrators' unit and/or the teachers' unit that members of the administrators' unit whose positions have been eliminated or who have lost their positions to other administrators, may not bump into positions held by members in the teachers' unit or be assigned to unoccupied positions in the teachers' unit?
(e) If such a provision is negotiated between a teachers' unit and a school board prohibiting such bumping or assignment, is said provision enforceable notwithstanding lack of agreement by the administrators' unit to such provision?
(f) If such a provision were to be negotiated between a teachers' unit and a school board prohibiting such bumping or assignment, could it be enforceable if there was an existing provision in the collective bargaining agreement of the administrators' unit permitting its members to bump members of the teachers' unit or permitting members of the administrators' unit to be assigned to unoccupied positions in the teachers' unit?
The ruling referred to in the stipulation contains the following order: "By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations by the Act Concerning School Board-Teacher Negotiations and by Section 4-176 of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 10-152e-26 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, it is hereby ORDERED "a.(i) A collective bargaining agreement between a school board and the bargaining representative for a teacher unit which contains a layoff procedure giving tenured members of the teacher unit rights to bump other tenured members of the teacher unit, must give tenured displaced administrator unit members bumping rights which are equal to the bumping rights given to tenured teacher unit members in that no criteria for determining layoff which disadvantages displaced administrators solely because of their service as administrators may be applied to them. Subject to this equal treatment restriction, the subject of tenured administrator unit members bumping tenured members of the teacher unit is a mandatory subject of bargaining for the exclusive representative of the teacher unit.
and DECLARED that the questions presented in this Petition for Declaratory Ruling are answered as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Honulik v. Town of Greenwich
... ... No. 18046 ... Supreme Court of Connecticut ... Argued April 15, 2008 ... Decided ... sought to arbitrate the matter before the state board of mediation and arbitration (board), but ... it nullifies or broadens express provision; labor law arbitrators ... 293 Conn. 715 ... refuse ... See Stratford v. International Assn. of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Local 998, 248 Conn ... v. National Labor Relations Board, 243 F.3d 87, 92 (1st Cir.2001); see also ... ...
-
Labbe v. Hartford Pension Com'n
... ... No. 15275 ... Supreme Court of Connecticut ... Argued March 19, 1996 ... Decided Aug ... The trial court, Hon. Robert J. Hale, state trial referee, dismissed the action on the ground ... Sheet Metal Workers International Assn., Local Union No. 6, 493 U.S. 67, 87, 110 S.Ct ... v. State Board of Labor Relations, 5 Conn. [239 Conn. 195] App. 253, ... ...
-
Honulik v. Town of Greenwich
... ... No. 18046 ... Supreme Court of Connecticut ... Argued April 15, 2008 ... Decided ... sought to arbitrate the matter before the state board of mediation and arbitration, but the board ... distinctions are critical in the context of labor law and, accordingly, to our resolution of the ... West Hartford Education Assn., Inc. v. DeCourcy, 162 Conn. 566, 578-79, ... on interpretations by National Labor Relations Board because Connecticut statutes dealing with ... ...
-
Cimochowski v. Hartford Public Schools, (SC 16578).
... ... (SC 16578) ... Supreme Court of Connecticut ... Argued April 16, 2002 ... Officially ... requiring a certificate issued by the State Board of Education, a `teacher,' as that term is ... administrators." See Connecticut Education Assn. v. State Board of Labor Relations, 5 Conn ... ...