General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 73-2652.
| Citation | 498 F.2d 327 |
| Decision Date | 05 August 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 73-2652.,73-2652. |
| Parties | GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DADE BONDED WAREHOUSE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
William G. Earle, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Harold C. Knecht, Jr., Coral Gables, Fla., for Moore Pipe & Sprinkler.
Dan G. Wheeler, Jr., Miami, Fla., for Blanche R. Bergin.
Hugh L. Wood, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, Fla., for Dade Bonded Warehouse.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
In this action General Motors asserted claims against both Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc. and Blanche R. Bergin, executrix of the estate of Cecil A. Bergin. Although the jury was charged on the various theories of liability possibly applicable to Bergin, their verdict did not mention the claim against her. Furthermore, a careful search of the record reveals that no judgment was ever entered on this claim, although the district court did deny General Motors' motion for a new trial against Bergin. Thus the judgment fails to adjudicate all the claims and liabilities of all the parties, as required by F.R.Civ.P. 54(b). No certificate under F.R.Civ.P. 54(b) appears in the record. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2781; F.R. Civ.P. 58; 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See, e. g., Anderson v. Robinson, 5 Cir. 1974, 494 F.2d 45; Foret v. McDermott, 5 Cir. 1973, 484 F.2d 992. See also, United States v. Indrelunas, 1973, 411 U.S. 216, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 36 L.Ed.2d 202; State National Bank of El Paso v. United States, 5 Cir. 1974, 488 F.2d 890.
Should the district court enter a new judgment on General Motors' claim against Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., and issue the Rule 54(b) certificate, the appeal from that judgment may be submitted on the record and briefs prepared for this appeal, supplemented by the new judgment and certificate, and on the oral arguments heretofore heard.
Dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Huckeby v. Frozen Food Exp.
...General Contractors, Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 501 F.2d 176 (5th Cir. 1974); General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1974). It is undisputed that the district court never certified its order dismissing Bobo's complaint for immed......
-
Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
...Eastman, Dillon & Co., Inc., 5 Cir. 1978, 565 F.2d 1322; Anderson v. Robinson, 5 Cir. 1974, 494 F.2d 45; General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974,498 F.2d 327. Until the Rule 54(b) imprimatur is added, no appealable order exists, even if there is a judgment complying......
-
Chateaugay Corp., In re, 246
...this panel will resolve the appeal on the merits without further briefing or oral argument. See General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327, 328 (5th Cir.1974). * Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.1 28 ......
-
Harris v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc.
...all issues in order for a judgment entry therein to constitute a final appealable order); accord, General Motors Corp. v. Dade Bonded Warehouse, Inc., 498 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1974); Danzig v. Virgin Isle Hotel, Inc., 278 F.2d 580 (3d Cir. 1960). Moreover, the parties and the court here expre......