Cage v. Louisiana
Citation | 111 S.Ct. 328,112 L.Ed.2d 339,498 U.S. 39 |
Decision Date | 13 November 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89-7302,89-7302 |
Parties | Tommy CAGE v. LOUISIANA |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
In state criminal trials, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment "protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged." In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1073, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 315-316, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2787, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). This reasonable doubt standard "plays a vital role in the American scheme of criminal procedure." Winship, 397 U.S., at 363, 90 S.Ct., at 1072. Among other things, "[i]t is a prime instrument for reducing the risk of convictions resting on factual error." Ibid. The issue before us is whether the reasonable doubt instruction in this case complied with Winship.
Petitioner was convicted in a Louisiana trial court of first-degree murder and was sentenced to death. He appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, arguing, inter alia, that the reasonable doubt instruction used in the guilt phase of his trial was constitutionally defective. The instruction provided in relevant part:
554 So.2d 39, 41 (La.1989) (emphasis added).
The Supreme Court of Louisiana rejected petitioner's argument. The court first observed that the use of the phrases "grave uncertainty" and "moral certainty" in the instruction, "if taken out of context, might overstate the requisite degree of uncertainty and confuse the jury." Ibid. But "taking the charge as a whole," the court concluded that "reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand the definition of 'reasonable doubt.' " Ibid. It is our view, however, that the instruction at issue was contrary to the "beyond a reasonable doubt" requirement articulated in Winship.
In construing the instruction, we consider how reasonable jurors could have understood the charge as a whole. Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307, 316, 105 S.Ct. 1965, 1972, 85 L.Ed.2d 344 (1985). The charge did at one point instruct that to convict, guilt must be found beyond a reasonable doubt; but it then equated a reasonable doubt with a "grave uncertainty" and an "actual substantial doubt," and stated that what was required was a ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Capote v. State
...lack of evidence can create reasonable doubt. According to Capote, the circuit court's instruction violates Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed. 2d 339 (1990). Because Capote did not object to the circuit court's instruction on reasonable doubt, this Court reviews this c......
-
Arthur v. State
...of innocence impermissibly "diluted" the State's burden of proof. The appellant bases his argument on Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990). The language he specifically complains of, which was used by the trial court in giving its charge to the jury on the r......
-
United States v. Kieffer
...doubt.” Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 277, 113 S.Ct. 2078. Addressing an almost identical instruction in Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 41, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990) (per curiam), overruled in part by Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 72 n. 4, 112 S.Ct. 475, 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991), the ......
-
State v. Williams
...with which the accused is charged. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970). In Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990), the Supreme Court of the United States concluded that the reasonable doubt instruction in a state's capital trial d......
-
Trial practice
...guilty upon the strong probabilities of the case. Very similar instructions were held to be unconstitutional in Cage v. Louisiana , 498 U.S. 39 (1990). However, the Court determined the instructions given in Victor were not constitutionally defective because other instructions were sufficie......
-
THE REASONABLENESS OF THE "REASONABLENESS" STANDARD OF HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW UNDER THE ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996.
...right. See, e.g., Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 72 n.4 (1991) ("We acknowledge that language in the later cases of Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 (1990), and Yates v. Evatt, 500 U.S. 391 (1991), might be read as endorsing a different standard of review for jury instructions So that we ma......
-
Institutionalizing the Culture of Control
...(1991)Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776 (1987)Butler v. McKellar, 494 U.S. 407 (1990)Cabana v. Bullock, 474 U.S. 376 (1986)Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 (1990)Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740 (1998)Calderon v. Coleman, 520 U.S. 141 (1998)Calderon v. Thompson, 118 S. Ct. 1489 (1998)Caldwell v. M......
-
Coordinating the attack in trial
...Victor v. Nebraska (1994) 511 U.S. 1, 15 (“subjective state of near certitude of the guilt of the accused”); Cage v. Louisiana (1990) 498 U.S. 39, 41 (“evidentiary certainty”); People v. Hall (1964) 62 Cal.2d 104, 112 (“near certainty”) (empha-sis added).] Note, the trial courts continually......