State v. Gersdorf

Decision Date18 October 1909
Docket Number17,839
Citation50 So. 528,124 La. 547
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE v. GERSDORF

Appeal from Juvenile Court, Parish of Orleans; A. H. Wilson, Judge.

Augustus Gersdorf was convicted of non-support, and he appeals. Dismissed.

James B. Rosser, Jr., for appellant.

St. Clair Adams, Dist. Atty., and A. D. Henriques, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for the State.

OPINION

PROVOSTY, J.

Act No. 34, p. 42, of 1902, provides that:

"Any person who shall, without just cause, desert or willfully neglect to provide for the support of his wife or minor children in destitute or necessitous circumstances, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by," etc.

Defendant was charged before the juvenile court (which court is given cognizance by law of all such offenses) as follows:

"Did unlawfully and without just cause desert and neglect to provide for the support of Jessie and Bertha Gersdorf, his minor children and lawful issue, and the aforesaid minor children of said August Gersdorf then and there were and now are in destitute and necessitous circumstances," etc.

Quoting from the transcript:

"The plaintiff was then rearraigned, pleaded not guilty, and the trial proceeded with, when, after hearing the evidence of Mrs. Gersdorf and her husband, the accused was found guilty and ordered to pay to the criminal sheriff, each two weeks, the sum of seven and 50/100 dollars for the support of his minor children, wife to collect."

From the order thus made, defendant has appealed; and the state has moved to dismiss the appeal, relying upon the decision of this court in the case of State v. Mioton, 112 La. 180, 36 So. 314, where the appeal was from a similar order, and the court dismissed it on the ground that such an order is not a final judgment of conviction, and therefore is not appealable under the terms of the law regulating appeals from the judgments of the juvenile court.

The learned counsel for defendant says that the matter charged upon defendant is not made criminal by any statute of the state, and that therefore the ruling in the Mioton Case does not apply. The answer is that the matter charged is made criminal by said Act No. 34 of 1902.

Appeal-dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Fried
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1922
    ... ... bond, and, when sentenced, could have appealed to this court ... Relator should have exhausted his remedies for relief before ... applying to this court for writs of certiorari and ... prohibition. State v. Clark, 143 La. 481, 78 So ... 742; State v. Gersdorf, 124 La. 547, [152 La. 716] ... 50 So. 528; State v. Boettner, 127 La. 253, 53 So ... It is ... therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order for ... writs of certiorari and prohibition issued herein be ... recalled, and the application of relator be refused, at ... ...
  • State v. Cole, 45202
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1960
    ...appeal lies from any ruling or order which does not finally dispose of the case. State v. Mioton, 112 La. 180, 36 So. 314; State v. Gersdorf, 124 La. 547, 50 So. 528; State v. Boettner, 127 La. 253, 53 So. 555 and State v. Clark, 143 La. 481, 78 So. 742, are cited in support of this The arg......
  • State v. Donzi
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1913
    ... ... for separation and divorce, and that the remedy provided in ... Act No. 34 of 1902, p. 42, declaring child desertion to be a ... misdemeanor, was valid. The cases of State v ... Mioton, 112 La. 180, 36 So. 314, State v ... Gersdorf, 124 La. 547, 50 So. 528, and State v ... Boettner, 127 La. 253, 53 So. 555, are not applicable to ... the matters involved in this case ... The ... Constitution, art. 139, confers upon the criminal district ... court for the parish of Orleans exclusive original ... jurisdiction ... ...
  • State v. Clark
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • April 29, 1918
    ... ... The order to pay alimony was not a ... sentence; and no appeal would lie until sentence of fine or ... imprisonment, or both, had been imposed. State v ... Mioton, 112 La. 180, 36 So. 314; State ex rel ... Mioton v. Judge, 112 La. 801, 36 So. 703; State v ... Gersdorf, 124 La. 547, 50 So. 528; State v ... Boettner, 127 La. 253, 53 So. 555 ... The ... order of the court to defendant to give a guaranty bond, with ... security to guarantee the payment of future alimony, and, in ... default of furnishing such bond, defendant to be held for ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT