U.S. v. Mitchell

Decision Date05 September 2007
Docket NumberNo. 03-99010.,03-99010.
Citation502 F.3d 931
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lezmond C. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Celia M. Rumann, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, AZ, and Michael P. O'Connor, Tempe, AZ, for appellant Lezmond Mitchell.

Daniel R. Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, and Vincent Q. Kirby, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for appellee the United States.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Mary H. Murguia, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-01-01062-PCT-MHM:

Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, PAMELA ANN RYMER, and BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge RYMER; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Lezmond Mitchell, a Navajo, appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree murder, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111, 1153, felony murder, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111, 2111, carjacking resulting in death, 18 U.S.C. § 2119, and related federal crimes involving other Navajos on the Navajo Indian reservation in Arizona. A jury convicted Mitchell on all counts. Mitchell faced capital punishment under the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3591-98, because of his conviction for carjacking resulting in death. Following a penalty phase hearing, the jury unanimously returned a recommendation of a sentence of death as to each of the two victims who were murdered. The district court sentenced Mitchell to death on the carjacking count in accordance with the jury's verdict. We conclude that no error requiring reversal occurred in connection with either conviction or sentence, and therefore affirm.

I

In October 2001, Mitchell, then 20 years old, Jason Kinlicheenie, Gregory Nakai and Jakegory Nakai decided to rob a trading post on the Arizona side of the Navajo Indian reservation. Mitchell and 16 year-old Johnny Orsinger set out from Round Rock, Arizona, for Gallup, New Mexico, on October 27 to look for a vehicle they could steal to use during the robbery. They bought one knife and stole another while there. Hitchhiking back to the reservation, they were picked up by a trucker who took them part of the way.

Meanwhile, on the afternoon of Sunday, October 28, 2001, Alyce Slim (63 years old) and her nine year-old granddaughter, Jane Doe, left Fort Defiance, Arizona to go to Tohatchi, New Mexico where Slim hoped to secure the services of Betty Denison, a traditional medicine person, for leg ailments. It is a 35 minute drive that the two made in Slim's pewter-colored double cab Sierra GMC pickup truck. They got to Tohatchi about 4 p.m. Denison was unable to assist her, but thought another medicine woman, Marie Dale, might be able to help. She, Slim, and Jane drove to Twin Lakes, New Mexico where Slim arranged an appointment with Dale for the next day. The three returned to Denison's home where they dropped Denison off around 5 p.m., then Slim and her granddaughter left. That is the last time they were seen alive.

Somewhere in route, and somehow, Mitchell and Orsinger got into Slim's truck. Slim and Jane were in front, Mitchell in the right-rear passenger seat and Orsinger in the left. Slim stopped near Sawmill, Arizona, to let Mitchell and Orsinger out of the car, but Orsinger started stabbing her with a knife and Mitchell joined in. Slim ended up being stabbed 33 times, both from the left and right, with sixteen incised wounds on her hands that indicated she fought the attack. Once dead, her body was pulled onto the rear seat. Jane was put next to her. Mitchell drove the truck some 30-40 miles into the mountains with Jane beside her grandmother's body.

There, Slim's body was dragged out. Jane was ordered out of the truck and told by Mitchell "to lay down and die." Mitchell cut Jane's throat twice, but she didn't die. Orsinger and he then dropped large rocks on her head, which killed her. Twenty-pound rocks containing blood tied to Jane were found near the bodies.

Mitchell and Orsinger returned to the site with an axe and shovel. Mitchell dug a hole while Orsinger severed the heads and hands of Jane and Slim. Together, they dropped the severed body parts (along with Mitchell's glove) into the hole, and covered them. The torsos were pulled into the woods. Later they burned the victims' clothing, jewelry, and glasses. Mitchell and Orsinger washed the blood from the knives in a nearby stream; the next day, Mitchell also washed the knives with alcohol to remove any blood.

Jane's mother, Marlene, became concerned when Jane and Slim, who was Marlene's mother, had not returned home. She tried to call Slim on her cell phone Sunday night, then the next morning at home, but got no answer. After checking at Slim's house and Jane's school, Marlene filed a missing persons report on Tuesday.

On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, the Red Rock Trading Post, a convenience store and gas station located in Navajo territory, was robbed by three masked men. Kinlicheenie supplied the masks as well as his parents' car for use after the truck was abandoned; Mitchell carried a 12-gauge shotgun, and Jakegory Nakai had a .22 caliber rifle. Charlotte Yazzie, the store manager, was mopping the floor when one of the robbers assaulted her, striking her with his firearm and pulling her behind a desk. Watching this, another store clerk, Kimberly Allen, ducked behind shelving. A second robber saw Allen and pushed her against the counters. When Allen said she didn't know the combination to the safe, the gunman told her, "If you lie to me or you don't cooperate with us, we are going to kill you." He told Allen to turn on the gas pump. As she did, she saw a pickup truck parked outside, which she described as a double cab beige Chevrolet. Yazzie was taken into a back room where the robbers demanded, and she provided, more money. Mitchell, Nakai and Kinlicheenie emptied the cash registers and safe and then tied down Allen and Yazzie in the vault room. They made off with $5,530 and Yazzie's purse.

The robbers drove back to Kinlicheenie's car and he followed the truck to a place about a mile and a half south of Wheatfields, Arizona, where Mitchell set fire to it using kerosene stolen from the Trading Post. They returned to the Nakai residence and split the money. Mitchell got $300 from Kinlicheenie.

As it happens, a customer and his girlfriend pulled into the parking lot while the robbery was in progress and saw two of the masked gunmen, one of whom was wearing purple gloves. The customer also saw a beige, extended cab Sierra or Silverado model truck parked at the fuel tank. The customer's girlfriend took down the license plate number and gave it to one of the Trading Post employees. The next day, a Navajo police officer discovered an abandoned pickup truck a mile and a half south of Wheatfields, Arizona, within the Navajo Indian reservation. The officer detected the odor of gasoline, and portions of the truck's interior were burned. It turned out to be Slim's 2001 GMC Sierra pickup. Criminal investigators discovered a purple latex glove and Halloween masks inside the truck, as well as Mitchell's fingerprints and Slim's blood.

Based on this information and a tip, investigators focused on Orsinger, Orsinger's father, Mitchell, Jakegory Nakai and Gregory Nakai, among others. On the morning of November 4, 2001, FBI Agent Ray Duncan conducted a briefing with criminal investigators and SWAT team officers of the Navajo Department of Law Enforcement. Tribal warrants were issued and executed at the house of Gregory Nakai. Mitchell, Jimmy Nakai, and Gregory Nakai were arrested. Mitchell had been asleep and wore only a t-shirt and shortcuts. He asked for his pants, which he told an FBI agent were near a bunk bed on the floor. As the agent was picking them up, a silver butterfly knife fell from a pocket.

Gregory Nakai and his mother, Daisy Nakai, consented to a search of the house. Two FBI agents, an evidence technician, and a Navajo criminal investigator conducted the search. They retrieved the silver butterfly knife and found a second butterfly knife with a black handle. Trace amounts of blood from the silver knife were matched to Slim. The search also turned up a newspaper that had a front page story on the Trading Post robbery, and a cell phone belonging to Slim.

Agent Duncan and a Navajo criminal investigator met with Mitchell at the Navajo Department of Criminal Investigations around 1:30 p.m. Mitchell signed a waiver of his Miranda rights and, after flipping a coin, agreed to talk. When asked about his whereabouts on the weekend of October 27, Mitchell stated that he had been drinking around Round Rock. He denied being involved in the disappearances and robbery. Mitchell then agreed to a polygraph examination, which FBI Special Agent Kirk conducted about 5:30 p.m. Mitchell was reminded that his Miranda rights still applied and he signed an FBI consent form after reading it. Kirk told Mitchell that the test results indicated he had lied. Mitchell made inculpatory statements about the robbery and agreed to a tape recorded interview after again being reminded of his Miranda rights. Mitchell admitted his involvement in the Trading Post robbery, and also confirmed that he was present when "things happened" to Slim and Jane. He agreed to help investigators find the bodies. The interview ended around 11:00 p.m.

Orsinger was arrested the next day, November 5, 2001, and he, too, agreed to take agents to the bodies. Orsinger had difficulty doing so, and agents called for Mitchell to be brought out. Mitchell directed Navajo police officers to the site. While there, Mitchell acknowledged to Kirk that his Miranda rights were in effect and agreed to answer more questions. According to the agent, Mitchell stated that he had stabbed the "old lady," and that the evidence would show and/or witnesses would say that he had cut the young girl's throat twice....

To continue reading

Request your trial
292 cases
  • Mayhan v. Gipson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • June 12, 2016
    ... ... Mitchell , 502 F.3d 931, 986 (9th Cir.2007). Rather, in reviewing whether a "bona fide doubt" existed, and whether the state trial court's failure to sua ... We find that, on the record before us, and contrary to appellant's assertions, the trial court adequately considered defense counsel's investigation into appellant's mental health status ... ...
  • United States v. Christensen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of Illinois
    • April 24, 2019
    ... ... Id ... (citing, inter alia , United States v ... Mitchell , 502 F.3d 931, 976-77 (9th Cir. 2007); United States v ... Chanthadara , 230 F.3d 1237, 1262-63 (10th Cir. 2000); United States v ... Webster , 162 ... ...
  • Noguera v. Davis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • November 17, 2017
    ... ... In Mitchell v. United States , 526 U.S. 314, 119 S.Ct. 1307, 143 L.Ed.2d 424 (1999), the Supreme Court held that he Fifth Amendment right to remain silent ... [] As we get into this case, those of you that stay with us, you'll see that I have a peculiar sense of humordoesn't always work, as this last little joke didn't. (Dkt. No. 317 at 178, quoting RT 1460.) ... ...
  • Bolin v. Chappell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • June 9, 2016
    ... ... for this re-enactment on America's Most Wanted , I do not think there are grounds to change the venue on any of the criteria that we have before us concerning that. That's the big issue. Fair enough? (11/1/90 RT at 50:19-24.) Defense counsel never raised the venue issue again, and the trial court ... constitutional violation, no relief can be granted even if the instruction given might not have been correct as a matter of state law." Mitchell v. Goldsmith , 878 F.2d 319, 324 (9th Cir. 1989). For the reasons stated above and those discussed in claims R1-R3, Petitioner has not demonstrated ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Trial
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Federal Criminal Practice
    • April 30, 2022
    ..., 157 F.3d 730, 733 (9th Cir. 1998); Dotson v. Zenon , 549 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 1305 (D. Colo. 2008); but see United States v. Mitchell , 502 F.3d 931, 955 (9th Cir. 2007) (district court’s refusal to excuse a juror for cause reviewed for abuse of discretion). The burden is on the defendant to......
  • TOWARD A MORE PERFECT TRIAL: AMENDING FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 106 AND 803 TO COMPLETE THE RULE OF COMPLETENESS.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 111 No. 4, September 2021
    • September 22, 2021
    ...Second Circuit rule that "Rule 106 does not compel admission of otherwise inadmissible hearsay evidence."); United States v. Mitchell, 502 F.3d 931, 965 n.9 (9th Cir. 2007) ("Rule 106 does not render admissible otherwise inadmissible hearsay."); United States v. Ortega, 203 F.3d 675, 682 (9......
  • Batson Fails Again: How the Resurgence of Black Lives Matter Highlights the Ease of Bypassing the Race-Neutral Requirement and Proposed Modifications to Refine the Standard.
    • United States
    • Suffolk University Law Review Vol. 55 No. 3, June 2022
    • June 22, 2022
    ...2005) (holding negative opinions toward law enforcement and prior conviction appropriate reasons for removal); United States v. Mitchell, 502 F.3d 931, 951 (9th Cir. 2007); see also LaFave et al., supra note 5, [section] 22.3(a) (noting parties allowed to inquire about views of death penalt......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT