Langlotz v. Citizens Fidelity Ins. Co.

Decision Date16 January 1974
Docket NumberNo. B--4195,B--4195
Citation505 S.W.2d 249
PartiesArthur LANGLOTZ, Petitioner, v. CITIZENS FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Herndon, Girand, Smith & Kolodey, Marshall W. Dooley, Dallas, for petitioner.

Sheehy, Cureton, Westbrook, Lovelace & Nielsen, W. E. Cureton, Waco, for respondent.

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

In this suit on a life insurance policy, the only question before us is whether there is some evidence to support the jury's verdict that the insured did not commit suicide. We hold that there is some such evidence. We, therefore, reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals which held that, as a matter of law, there was a suicide. 497 S.W.2d 493. We affirm the judgment of the trial court which had entered a judgment for the plaintiff on the jury's verdict.

No new question of law is before us, and no useful purpose would be served by an extended opinion. The facts, many of which would indicate suicide, are set out in the opinion of the court of civil appeals. They will not be repeated here since our function is to determine whether the evidence, viewed most favorably in support of the jury's verdict amounts to more than a scintilla of evidence to support such verdict. The question as to whether there is 'some evidence' is, in many instances, a difficult one; and, under the circumstances presented here, it is necessarily a judgment call. It is not within our jurisdiction to weigh the evidence and to determine what we think happened.

The definition of 'suicide' given to the jury, and as to which there was no objection, was, 'You are instructed that suicide means the intentional taking of one's own life.'

We regard the following facts and circumstances as constituting more than a scintilla of evidence that there was not an intentional taking of the life of the insured: Jimmie Langlotz, the 23 year old insured, lived in an apartment in Waco with two other young men. His mother and father also lived in Waco, and Jimmie talked to his mother every day. He had no emotional problems that she knew of.

The events leading to Jimmie's death began on the Saturday before Easter. He had called his mother that Saturday morning and had made arrangements to go to sunrise Easter services with her the following morning. The gunshot occurred about 1:30 on Easter morning, but Jimmie had called his mother around midnight to reconfirm their going to church at 7:30 a.m. His mother did not notice anything unusual in the conversation.

There was evidence that the insured, after 1:00 a.m., asked his roommate whether the guns had been cleaned; and it is undisputed that the gun cleaning equipment had been obtained and opened by the insured before the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Henderson v. Ford Motor Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1974
    ...inferences which are contrary to that finding. Martinez v. Delta Brands, Inc., 515 S.W.2d 263 (Tex.1974); Langlotz v. Citizens Fidelity Insurance Company, 505 S.W.2d 249 (Tex.1974); Butler v. Hanson, 455 S.W.2d 942 (Tex.1970); Renfro Drug Co. v. Lewis, 149 Tex. 507, 235 S.W.2d 609 (1950); C......
  • Rourke v. Garza
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1975
    ...the evidence and inferences contrary to the findings. Martinez v. Delta Brands, Inc., 515 S.W.2d 263 (Tex.1974); Langlotz v. Citizens Fidelity Ins. Co.,505 S.W.2d 249 (Tex.1974). The jury having found that the scaffold boards were unreasonably dangerous, and there being evidence to support ......
  • Miller v. Riata Cadillac Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1974
    ...which support that finding and rejecting the evidence and inferences contrary to that finding. E.g., Langlotz v. Citizens Fidelity Insurance Company, 505 S.W.2d 249 (Tex.1974); Butler v. Hanson, 455 S.W.2d 942 (Tex.1970). Hubert Riley, president of Riata Cadillac, testified as to Miller's d......
  • Cockerham v. Cockerham
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • July 9, 1975
    ...in fact, there was no such intention. This finding must be upheld if it finds any support in the evidence. Langlotz v. Citizens Fidelity Insurance Company, 505 S.W.2d 249 (Tex.1974); Butler v. Hanson, 455 S.W.2d 942 (Tex.1970). Considering the record before us, we are unable to say there is......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT