Lee v. Weisman
| Decision Date | 24 June 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-1014,90-1014 |
| Parties | Robert E. LEE, Individually and as Principal of Nathan Bishop Middle School, et al., Petitioners v. Daniel WEISMAN etc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Principals of public middle and high schools in Providence, Rhode Island, are permitted to invite members of the clergy to give invocations and benedictions at their schools' graduation ceremonies. Petitioner Lee, a middle school principal, invited a rabbi to offer such prayers at the graduation ceremony for Deborah Weisman's class, gave the Rabbi a pamphlet containing guidelines for the composition of public prayers at civic ceremonies, and advised him that the prayers should be nonsectarian. Shortly before the ceremony, the District Court denied the motion of respondent Weisman, Deborah's father, for a temporary restraining order to prohibit school officials from including the prayers in the ceremony. Deborah and her family attended the ceremony, and the prayers were recited. Subsequently, Weisman sought a permanent injunction barring Lee and other petitioners, various Providence public school officials, from inviting clergy to deliver invocations and benedictions at future graduations. It appears likely that such prayers will be conducted at Deborah's high school graduation. The District Court enjoined petitioners from continuing the practice at issue on the ground that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: Including clergy who offer prayers as part of an official public school graduation ceremony is forbidden by the Establishment Clause. Pp. 586-599.
(a) This Court need not revisit the questions of the definition and scope of the principles governing the extent of permitted accommodation by the State for its citizens' religious beliefs and practices, for the controlling precedents as they relate to prayer and religious exercise in primary and secondary public schools compel the holding here. Thus, the Court will not reconsider its decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 91 S.Ct. 2105, 29 L.Ed.2d 745. The principle that government may accommodate the free exercise of religion does not supersede the fundamental limitations imposed by the Establishment Clause, which guarantees at a minimum that a government may not coerce anyone to support or participate in religion or its exercise, or otherwise act in a way which "establishes a
[state] religion or religious faith, or tends to do so." Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 678, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 1361, 79 L.Ed.2d 604. Pp. 586-587.
(b) State officials here direct the performance of a formal religious exercise at secondary schools' promotional and graduation ceremonies. Lee's decision that prayers should be given and his selection of the religious participant are choices attributable to the State. Moreover, through the pamphlet and his advice that the prayers be nonsectarian, he directed and controlled the prayers' content. That the directions may have been given in a good faith attempt to make the prayers acceptable to most persons does not resolve the dilemma caused by the school's involvement, since the government may not establish an official or civic religion as a means of avoiding the establishment of a religion with more specific creeds. Pp. 587-590.
(c) The Establishment Clause was inspired by the lesson that in the hands of government what might begin as a tolerant expression of religious views may end in a policy to indoctrinate and coerce. Prayer exercises in elementary and secondary schools carry a particular risk of indirect coercion. Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, 82 S.Ct. 1261, 8 L.Ed.2d 601; Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S.Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2d 844. The school district's supervision and control of a high school graduation ceremony places subtle and indirect public and peer pressure on attending students to stand as a group or maintain respectful silence during the invocation and benediction. A reasonable dissenter of high school age could believe that standing or remaining silent signified her own participation in, or approval of, the group exercise, rather than her respect for it. And the State may not place the student dissenter in the dilemma of participating or protesting. Since adolescents are often susceptible to peer pressure, especially in matters of social convention, the State may no more use social pressure to enforce orthodoxy than it may use direct means. The embarrassment and intrusion of the religious exercise cannot be refuted by arguing that the prayers are of a de minimis character, since that is an affront to the Rabbi and those for whom the prayers have meaning, and since any intrusion was both real and a violation of the objectors' rights. Pp. 590-594.
(d) Petitioners' argument that the option of not attending the ceremony excuses any inducement or coercion in the ceremony itself is rejected. In this society, high school graduation is one of life's most significant occasions, and a student is not free to absent herself from the exercise in any real sense of the term "voluntary." Also not dispositive is the contention that prayers are an essential part of these ceremonies because for many persons the occasion would lack meaning without the recognition that human achievements cannot be understood apart from their spiritual essence. This position fails to acknowledge that what
for many was a spiritual imperative was for the Weismans religious conformance compelled by the State. It also gives insufficient recognition to the real conflict of conscience faced by a student who would have to choose whether to miss graduation or conform to the state-sponsored practice, in an environment where the risk of compulsion is especially high. Pp. 594-596.
(e) Inherent differences between the public school system and a session of a state legislature distinguish this case from Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 103 S.Ct. 3330, 77 L.Ed.2d 1019, which condoned a prayer exercise. The atmosphere at a state legislature's opening, where adults are free to enter and leave with little comment and for any number of reasons, cannot compare with the constraining potential of the one school event most important for the student to attend. Pp. 596-598.
908 F.2d 1090 (CA1 1990), affirmed.
SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and WHITE and THOMAS, JJ., joined.
Charles J. Cooper, for petitioners.
Kenneth W. Starr, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioners.
Sandra A. Blanding, for respondent.
School principals in the public school system of the city of Providence, Rhode Island, are permitted to invite members of the clergy to offer invocation and benediction prayers as part of the formal graduation ceremonies for middle schools and for high schools. The question before us is whether including clerical members who offer prayers as part of the official school graduation ceremony is consistent with the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment, provisions the Fourteenth Amendment makes applicable with full force to the States and their school districts.
Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public school in Providence, at a formal ceremony in June 1989. She was about 14 years old. For many years it has been the policy of the Providence School Committee and the Superintendent of Schools to permit principals to invite members of the clergy to give invocations and benedictions at middle school and high school graduations. Many, but not all, of the principals elected to include prayers as part of the graduation ceremonies. Acting for himself and his daughter, Deborah's father, Daniel Weisman, objected to any prayers at Deborah's middle school graduation, but to no avail. The school principal, petitioner Robert E. Lee, invited a rabbi to deliver prayers at the graduation exercises for Deborah's class. Rabbi Leslie Gutterman, of the Temple Beth El in Providence, accepted.
It has been the custom of Providence school officials to provide invited clergy with a pamphlet entitled "Guidelines for Civic Occasions," prepared by the National Conference of Christians and Jews. The Guidelines recommend that public prayers at nonsectarian civic ceremonies be composed with "inclusiveness and sensitivity," though they acknowledge that "[p]rayer of any kind may be inappropriate on some civic occasions." App. 20-21. The principal gave Rabbi Gutterman the pamphlet before the graduation and advised him the invocation and benediction should be nonsectarian. Agreed Statement of Facts ¶ 17, id., at 13.
Rabbi Gutterman's prayers were as follows:
thank You. May these young men and women grow up to enrich it.
"For the liberty of America, we thank You. May these
new graduates grow up to guard it.
graduates of Nathan Bishop Middle School so live that they might help to share it.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rowe v. Superior Court, No. B070406
... ... Page 639 ... legislation which either (1) burdens others while benefiting religion (Estate of Thornton v. [15 Cal.App.4th 1733] Caldor, Inc., supra, 472 U.S. at pp. 708-709, 105 S.Ct. at p. 2917; (2) compels participation in religious observances (Lee v. Weisman (1992) 505 U.S. 577, ----, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 2661, 120 L.Ed.2d 467, 488; or (3) endorses particular religious ideas or endorses religious ideas generally (Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) 393 U.S. 97, 106-107, 89 S.Ct. 266, 272, 21 L.Ed.2d 228). By contrast, the Supreme Court has found legislation to ... ...
-
Citizens for Quality Educ. San Diego v. Barrera
... ... at 583–84, 107 S.Ct. 2573. Courts "recognize that minors' beliefs and actions are often more vulnerable to outside influence." Freedom FromReligion Found., Inc. v. Chino Valley Unified Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. , 896 F.3d 1132, 1144 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Lee v. Weisman , 505 U.S. 577, 593–94, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1991) ). "Because children's ‘experience is limited,’ their ‘beliefs consequently are the function of environment as much as of free and voluntary choice.’ " Id. at 1145–46 (quoting Sch. Dist. of City of Grand Rapids v. Ball ... ...
-
O.T. ex rel. Turton v. Frenchtown Elementary
... ... at 115, 121 S.Ct. 2093. Thus, the Court holds that Defendant's Establishment Clause concerns do not justify Frenchtown's discriminatory restriction ... Moreover, the Court finds that Defendant's reliance on public school prayer cases such as Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992) and Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, 120 S.Ct. 2266, 147 L.Ed.2d 295 (2000) inapposite. In Lee, the Court considered whether a school policy that permitted principals to invite clergy members to give invocations ... ...
-
American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. Sebelius
... ... Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984), and applied by a majority of the Court in County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573, 109 S.Ct. 3086, 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989); and the coercion analysis of Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 587, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992). 19 Freedom From Religion Found. v. Hanover Sch. Dist., 626 F.3d 1, 7 (1st Cir.2010). The first of these analytical approachesthe Lemon testencompasses three criteria that the government must meet if its actions are to be deemed ... ...
-
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE.
...(362) See id. at 2421. (363) See id. at 2423. (364) Id. at 2421. (365) Id. at 2425, 2430-31 (quoting Lee v. Weisman ex rel. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 590 (1992)). The Court went on to emphasize that "[r]espect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic" a......
-
God(s) in Congress: A Two-Step Analysis Addressing the Constitutionality of Guest-Chaplain Invocations, and a Call for Aggressive Enforcement of the Establishment Clause
...at 1269 (quoting Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 678 (1984)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 83. Id. at 1269 (quoting Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 597 (1992)). 84. Id. at 1269–78. 85. Id. at 1271 (quoting Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 794 (1983)). 86. Id. (citing Cnty. of Allegheny......
-
The Establishment Clause: The Lemon and Marsh Conflict, Where Lund and Bormuth Leave Us, and the Constitutionality of Exclusive, Legislator-Led Prayer.
...(1971) (conceding vagueness of Establishment Clause and establishing new test for Establishment Clause cases). (32.) See Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 586-87 (1992) (recognizing coercion test formally); Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 688 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring) (establishing exp......
-
ESTABLISHMENT'S POLITICAL PRIORITY TO FREE EXERCISE.
...note 31, at 245-50. One can hear similar sorts of statements even in the mouths of Supreme Court Justices. See, e.g., Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 609 (1992) (Sotuer, J., concurring) ("We have believed that ... a [democratic] government cannot endure when there is fusion between religion a......