William Woodruff, Plaintiff In Error v. Frederick Trapnall
Citation | 51 U.S. 190,13 L.Ed. 383,10 How. 190 |
Parties | WILLIAM E. WOODRUFF, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FREDERICK W. TRAPNALL |
Decision Date | 01 December 1850 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
This is the whole argument, or rather series of assertions, used by the court. It assumes that a repeal of the act would repeal, and could constitutionally repeal, the promise and pledge contained in the twenty-eighth section; that, indeed, it is no pledge, but a privilege gratuitously conferred, on...
To continue reading
Request your trial55 cases
-
Wood v. Lovett
...Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Moss, 196 Ark. 553, 118 S.W.2d 873; Sanderson v. Walls, 200 Ark. 534, 140 S.W.2d 117. 11 Woodruff v. Trapnall, 10 How. 190, 205, 13 L.Ed. 383. 12 Corbin v. Commissioners, C.C., 3 F. 356; Marx v. Hanthorn, C.C., 30 F. 579 (see Id., 148 U.S. 172, 182, 13 S.Ct. 508......
-
Walsh v. Board of Administration
...the obligation of its own contracts, than it can impair the obligation of the contracts of individuals." (Woodruff v. Trapnall (1850) 51 U.S. (10 How.) 190, 207, 13 L.Ed. 383, 390.) When a claim is presented under the contract clause three questions may arise. First, it must be determined w......
-
First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine Turnpike Authority
...Trust Co., 8 Cir., 1931, 52 F.2d 431, 87 A.L.R. 386; Hawthorne v. Calef, 1864, 2 Wall. 10, 17 L.Ed. 776; Woodruff v. Trapnall, 1850, 10 How. 190, 13 L.Ed. 383; Curran v. State of Arkansas, 1853, 15 How. 304, 14 L.Ed. 705; Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 1866, 4 Wall. 535, 18 L.Ed. 'The amoun......
-
Rui One Corp. v. City of Berkeley
...United States Constitution because it has "impair[ed], by legislation, the obligation of its own contracts." Woodruff v. Trapnall, 51 U.S. 190, 207, 10 How. 190, 13 L.Ed. 383 (1850). I respectfully The majority forgoes a factual recitation of how Berkeley passed the Marina Amendment. These ......
Request a trial to view additional results