Perez v. State
| Citation | 514 S.W.2d 748 |
| Decision Date | 23 October 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 49111,49111 |
| Parties | Elias V. PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas |
Gregory Luna and Jeffrey Wentworth, San Antonio, for appellant.
Ted Butler, Dist. Atty., Lucien Campbell, Douglas Young, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
DALLY, Commissioner.
The appellant was convicted for possession of heroin, and his punishment assessed by a jury was imprisonment for twelve years. A single ground of error asserts that the trial court erred in denying the appellant's motion to suppress evidence and in overruling his timely objection to the introduction of evidence alleged to have been unlawfully obtained.
On March 11, 1973, between 6:00 and 8:00 p.m., appellant entered the American Hotel in San Antonio and rented a cot for the night from the manager Gerald Gilbert. About 1:00 a.m. the next morning, as Gilbert was checking the second floor of the hotel for drunks and fires, he noticed appellant, apparently unconscious, lying in a toilet stall in the community bath used by tenants. Gilbert was unable to awaken appellant and observed a bottle cap on the floor beside him. Fearing that appellant might be dying, Gilbert called the police.
Officer Robert M. Garcia arrived at the hotel shortly after 1:00 a.m. and was directed by Gilbert to the second floor toilet stall where appellant lay unconscious. Garcia attempted to revive appellant and asked him what was wrong. Appellant, however, made no response. Garcia then noticed a warm bottle cap, a yellow balloon, and an eyedropper on the floor next to appellant. On appellant's left arm Garcia saw what appeared to be a fresh needle mark, which indicated to Garcia that appellant had just had a 'fix' of narcotics. Garcia then asked appellant his name, but appellant gave no answer and only stared at the ceiling. To ascertain whether appellant was carrying any identification, Garcia searched appellant's pockets. In appellant's right front pants pocket Garcia found a pink balloon containing a brown powder later determined to be heroin. After discovery of the suspected heroin, appellant was placed under arrest by Officer Garcia.
In view of the circumstances stated, the search of the appellant could be sustained both on the grounds that Officer Garcia had probable cause to search the appellant and on the grounds that exigent circumstances justified the search. Officer Garcia was lawfully in a position where he observed the appellant in an unconscious condition. Corbett v. State, 493 S.W.2d 940 (Tex.Cr.App.1973). When he found a warm bottle cap, a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Becknell v. State
...(Tex.Cr.App.1972); Buchanan v. State, 471 S.W.2d 401 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Bray v. State, 597 S.W.2d 763 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tijerina v. State, 578 S.W.2d 415 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Vargas v. State, 542 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); In re Scott K., ......
-
Morris v. State, 94-187
...Cal.Rptr. 616 (1964); State v. Auman, 386 N.W.2d 818 (Minn.Ct.App.1986); Missouri v. Miller, 486 S.W.2d 435 (Mo.1972); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex.Crim.App.1974). See United States v. Wilson, 524 F.2d 595 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 945, 96 S.Ct. 1415, 47 L.Ed.2d 351 (197......
-
Wagner v. Hedrick
...475 (Fla.App.1974); People v. Smith, 47 Ill.2d 161, 265 N.E.2d 139 (1970); State v. Miller, 486 S.W.2d 435 (Mo.1972); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex.Crim.1974). It should also be stressed, as Professor LaFave points out in his treatise, that the Supreme Court of the United States has n......
-
Sanchez v. State
...legitimate view of the evidence and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from that evidence."). 23. See also Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748, 749 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974) (police had probable cause for warrantless search of the defendant when he was found unconscious near drug paraphern......
-
Search and Seizure: Property
...person for identification, medical history and weapons. Tijerina v. State, 578 S.W.2d 415 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Even though the search incident to arrest exception does not apply to cell phones, other case-specific exceptions may stil......
-
Search and Seizure: Persons
...person for identification, medical history and weapons. Tijerina v. State, 578 S.W.2d 415 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Nothing in either the State or U.S. Constitutions prevents a police officer from knocking politely on any closed door. Cor......
-
Search and Seizure: Persons
...person for identification, medical history and weapons. Tijerina v. State, 578 S.W.2d 415 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Nothing in either the State or U.S. Constitutions prevents a police officer from knocking politely on any closed door. Cor......
-
Search and Seizure: Property
...person for identification, medical history and weapons. Tijerina v. State, 578 S.W.2d 415 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Perez v. State, 514 S.W.2d 748 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Even though the search incident to arrest exception does not apply to cell phones, other case-specific exceptions may stil......