U.S. v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Va
| Decision Date | 27 February 1996 |
| Docket Number | 941893 |
| Citation | 134 L.Ed.2d 46,116 S.Ct. 1036,516 U.S. 415 |
| Parties | ___ U.S. ___ UNITED STATES, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and JANET RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PETITIONERS v. CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA et al. NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, PETITIONER v. BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for consideration of the question whether they are moot.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
- Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.
-
Satellite Broadcasting & Communications v. F.C.C.
...v. FCC, 867 F.2d 654 (D.C.Cir.1989); Chesapeake & Potomac Tel., 42 F.3d at 190, vacated on grounds of mootness, 516 U.S. 415, 116 S.Ct. 1036, 134 L.Ed.2d 46 (1996); Turner I, 512 U.S. at 637-40, 114 S.Ct. 2445. But see Time Warner Entertainment v. FCC, 93 F.3d 957, 975 (D.C.Cir.1996) (holdi......
-
Martinez High v. Turpin
... ... A. Yes. All these things he had told us prior ... (Trial Tr. at 565). Dykes also testified that ... ...
-
Satellite Broad. & Commun. Assoc. v. Fed. Commun. Comm'n
...it regulates." Chesapeake and Potomac Tel. Co. of Va. v. United States, 42 F.3d 181, 193 (4th Cir. 1994), vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 415 (1996). If it does not, we then ask whether the regulation's "'manifest purpose is to regulate speech because of the message it conveys.'" Id. (qu......
Request a trial to view additional results