U.S. v. Macias, 74-2711
| Citation | 519 F.2d 697 |
| Decision Date | 08 July 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 74-2711,74-2711 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny A. MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Richard L. Rosenfield (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Darrell W. MacIntyre, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BARNES, WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.
It appearing to this Court that appellant has fled jurisdiction of the district court after perfecting appeal, and his bond has been forfeited, this appeal must be dismissed as both frivolous and moot. (See United States v. Dawson, 350 F.2d 396 (6th Cir. 1965); Brinlee v. United States, 483 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Shelton, 482 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1075, 94 S.Ct. 591, 38 L.Ed.2d 482 (1973); Johnson v. Laird, 432 F.2d 77, 78 (9th Cir. 1970).) Unless appellant submits himself to the jurisdiction of the district court within 30 days from the date of this order, the dismissal of this appeal shall be deemed final and no motion for reinstatement shall be entertainable. See United States v. Shelton, 508 F.2d 797 (5th Cir. 1975); and compare Johnson v. Laird, 435 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir. 1970).
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Marshall, 74-2070.
...Macias was found guilty on Counts One and Three; he has since disappeared and his appeal has been dismissed. United States v. Macias, 519 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1975). Marshall was found guilty on Counts One, Three and Four. He appeals and we I. The Tax Liens and Levies The $39,000 seized from ......
-
Lewis v. Delaware State Hospital, Civ. A. No. 79-529.
...v. United States, 483 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 878, 95 S.Ct. 142, 42 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); United States v. Macias, 519 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1975); United States v. Swigart, 490 F.2d 914 (10th Cir. 1973); Dawkins v. Mitchell, 437 F.2d 646 (D.C.Cir.1970). This policy of d......
-
Com. v. Hurley
...address the problem by refusing to allow a motion for reinstatement once the dismissal has become final. See United States v. Macias, 519 F.2d 697, 698 (9th Cir.1975) (if the defendant fails to return to the jurisdiction of the court within thirty days of the order, the dismissal is deemed ......
-
U.S. v. Sudthisa-Ard, SUDTHISA-AR
...Wood, 550 F.2d 435, 437-38 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. Villegas-Codallos, 543 F.2d 1124, 1125 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. Macias, 519 F.2d 697, 698 (9th Cir.1975). In Ortega-Rodriguez, the Supreme Court recently decided whether to extend the "disentitlement doctrine" to a defendan......