Chazin v. Brooks, 07-1068.

Decision Date28 April 2008
Docket NumberNo. 07-1068.,07-1068.
Citation523 F.3d 387
PartiesBarry CHAZIN, Appellant v. Marilyn BROOKS; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, (D.C. No. 06-cv-02566), District Judge: Honorable James T. Giles.

Michael J. Kelly, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Joshua S. Goldwert, Office of District Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Marilyn Brooks; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania.

Before: SLOVITER, JORDAN, and ALARCÓN*, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT ORDER

DOLORES K. SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

After consideration of the briefs and oral argument in the above case, the appeal is dismissed because appellant has failed to state a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

* Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • United States v. Gomez
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 10 Agosto 2012
  • U.S. v. Oca
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 11 Agosto 2011
  • Kawashima v. Holder Jr.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 4 Agosto 2010
  • U.S. v. Woods
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 5 Agosto 2009
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT