City of Erie v Pap's a.M.

Decision Date29 March 2000
Docket Number981161
Citation120 S.Ct. 1382,146 L.Ed.2d 265,529 U.S. 277
Parties CITY OF ERIE, et al., PETITIONERS v. PAP'S A. M. tdba "KANDYLAND"1161. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Syllabus

Erie, Pennsylvania, enacted an ordinance making it a summary offense to knowingly or intentionally appear in public in a "state of nudity." Respondent Pap's A. M. (hereinafter Pap's), a Pennsylvania corporation, operated "Kandyland," an Erie establishment featuring totally nude erotic dancing by women. To comply with the ordinance, these dancers had to wear, at a minimum, "pasties" and a "G-string." Pap's filed suit against Erie and city officials, seeking declaratory relief and a permanent injunction against the ordinance's enforcement. The Court of Common Pleas struck down the ordinance as unconstitutional, but the Commonwealth Court reversed. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in turn reversed, finding that the ordinance's public nudity sections violated Pap's right to freedom of expression as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Pennsylvania court held that nude dancing is expressive conduct entitled to some quantum of protection under the First Amendment, a view that the court noted was endorsed by eight Members of this Court in Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560. The Pennsylvania court explained that, although one stated purpose of the ordinance was to combat negative secondary effects, there was also an unmentioned purpose to "impact negatively on the erotic message of the dance." Accordingly, the Pennsylvania court concluded that the ordinance was related to the suppression of expression. Because the ordinance was not content neutral, it was subject to strict scrutiny. The court held that the ordinance failed the narrow tailoring requirement of strict scrutiny. After this Court granted certiorari, Pap's filed a motion to dismiss the case as moot, noting that Kandyland no longer operated as a nude dancing club, and that Pap's did not operate such a club at any other location. This Court denied the motion.

Held: The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.553 Pa. 348, 719 A. 2d 273, reversed and remanded.

Justice O'Connor, delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I and II, concluding that the case is not moot. A case is moot when the issues presented are no longer "live" or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome. County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631. Simply closing Kandyland is not sufficient to moot the case because Pap's is still incorporated under Pennsylvania law, and could again decide to operate a nude dancing establishment in Erie. Moreover, Pap's failed, despite its obligation to the Court, to mention the potential mootness issue in its brief in opposition, which was filed after Kandyland was closed and the property sold. See Board of License Comm'rs of Tiverton v. Pastore, 469 U.S. 238, 240. In any event, this is not a run of the mill voluntary cessation case. Here it is the plaintiff who, having prevailed below, seeks to have the case declared moot. And it is the defendant city that seeks to invoke the federal judicial power to obtain this Court's review of the decision. Cf. ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish, 490 U.S. 605, 617 618. The city has an ongoing injury because it is barred from enforcing the ordinance's public nudity provisions. If the ordinance is found constitutional, then Erie can enforce it, and the availability of such relief is sufficient to prevent the case from being moot. See Church of Scientology of Cal. v. United States, 506 U.S. 9, 13. And Pap's still has a concrete stake in the case's outcome because, to the extent it has an interest in resuming operations, it has an interest in preserving the judgment below. This Court's interest in preventing litigants from attempting to manipulate its jurisdiction to insulate a favorable decision from review further counsels against a finding of mootness. See, e.g., United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632. Pp. 5 7.

Justice O'Connor, joined by The Chief Justice, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Breyer, concluded in Parts III and IV that:

1. Government restrictions on public nudity such as Erie's ordinance should be evaluated under the framework set forth in United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367, for content-neutral restrictions on symbolic speech. Although being "in a state of nudity" is not an inherently expressive condition, nude dancing of the type at issue here is expressive conduct that falls within the outer ambit of the First Amendment's protection. See, e.g., Barnes, supra, at 565 566 (plurality opinion). What level of scrutiny applies is determined by whether the ordinance is related to the suppression of expression. E.g., Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 403. If the governmental purpose in enacting the ordinance is unrelated to such suppression, the ordinance need only satisfy the "less stringent," intermediate O'Brien standard. E.g., Johnson, supra, at 403. If the governmental interest is related to the expression's content, however, the ordinance falls outside O'Brien and must be justified under the more demanding, strict scrutiny standard. Johnson, supra, at 403. An almost identical public nudity ban was held not to violate the First Amendment in Barnes, although no five Members of the Court agreed on a single rationale for that conclusion. The ordinance here, like the statute in Barnes, is on its face a general prohibition on public nudity. By its terms, it regulates conduct alone. It does not target nudity that contains an erotic message; rather, it bans all public nudity, regardless of whether that nudity is accompanied by expressive activity. Although Pap's contends that the ordinance is related to the suppression of expression because its preamble suggests that its actual purpose is to prohibit erotic dancing of the type performed at Kandyland, that is not how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court interpreted that language. Rather, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court construed the preamble to mean that one purpose of the ordinance was to combat negative secondary effects. That is, the ordinance is aimed at combating crime and other negative secondary effects caused by the presence of adult entertainment establishments like Kandyland and not at suppressing the erotic message conveyed by this type of nude dancing. See 391 U.S., at 382; see also Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 321. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ultimate conclusion that the ordinance was nevertheless content based relied on Justice White's position in dissent in Barnes that a ban of this type necessarily has the purpose of suppressing the erotic message of the dance. That view was rejected by a majority of the Court in Barnes, and is here rejected again. Pap's argument that the ordinance is "aimed" at suppressing expression through a ban on nude dancing is really an argument that Erie also had an illicit motive in enacting the ordinance. However, this Court will not strike down an otherwise constitutional statute on the basis of an alleged illicit motive. O'Brien, supra, 391 U.S., at 382 383. Even if Erie's public nudity ban has some minimal effect on the erotic message by muting that portion of the expression that occurs when the last stitch is dropped, the dancers at Kandyland and other such establishments are free to perform wearing pasties and G-strings. Any effect on the overall expression is therefore de minimis. If States are to be able to regulate secondary effects, then such de minimis intrusions on expression cannot be sufficient to render the ordinance content based. See, e.g., Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288, 299. Thus, Erie's ordinance is valid if it satisfies the O'Brien test. Pp. 7 15.

2. Erie's ordinance satisfies O'Brien's four-factor test. First, the ordinance is within Erie's constitutional power to enact because the city's efforts to protect public health and safety are clearly within its police powers. Second, the ordinance furthers the important government interests of regulating conduct through a public nudity ban and of combating the harmful secondary effects associated with nude dancing. In terms of demonstrating that such secondary effects pose a threat, the city need not conduct new studies or produce evidence independent of that already generated by other cities, so long as the evidence relied on is reasonably believed to be relevant to the problem addressed. Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41, 51 52. Erie could reasonably rely on the evidentiary foundation set forth in Renton and Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50, to the effect that secondary effects are caused by the presence of even one adult entertainment establishment in a given neighborhood. See Renton, supra, at 51 52. In fact, Erie expressly relied on Barnes and its discussion of secondary effects, including its reference to Renton and American Mini Theatres. The evidentiary standard described in Renton controls here, and Erie meets that standard. In any event, the ordinance's preamble also relies on the city council's express findings that "certain lewd, immoral activities carried on in public places for profit are highly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare ." The council members, familiar with commercial downtown Erie, are the individuals who would likely have had first-hand knowledge of what took place at and around nude dancing establishments there, and can make particularized, expert...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1031 cases
  • Bimber's Delwood, Inc. v. James, 20-CV-1043S
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • 21 Octubre 2020
    ... ... within the outer ambit of the First Amendment's protection." See City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. , 529 U.S. 277, 289, 120 S. Ct. 1382, 146 L. Ed. 2d ... over the remaining state-law claims"); United Mine Workers of Am. v. Gibbs , 383 U.S. 715, 726, 86 S. Ct. 1130, 16 L. Ed. 2d 218 (1966) ... ...
  • Hollowell v. VA. MARINE RESOURCES COM'N
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 20 Abril 2010
    ... ... ' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 287, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 1390, 146 ... litigation position, but also of the agency's actions." Role Models Am., Inc. v. Brownlee, 353 F.3d 962, 967 (D.C.Cir. 2004) (citing Halverson ... ...
  • Koller v. Harris
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • 20 Abril 2018
    ... ... See Lee v. City of Los Angeles , 250 F.3d 668, 68869 (9th Cir. 2001). In addition, the ... parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. , 529 U.S. 277, 287, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000) ... ...
  • Congregation Kol Ami v. Abington Township
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 16 Octubre 2002
    ... ... Court's holding of unconstitutionality rested on its reading of City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, 473 U.S. 432, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 ... ' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 287, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000) ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
26 books & journal articles
  • Inverting the First Amendment.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 149 No. 4, April 2001
    • 1 Abril 2001
    ...of adult bookstores and movie theaters. Other Supreme Court cases that discuss secondary effects include: City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 286 (2000) (upholding a ban on nude dancing based on its nonmeaning "secondary effects"), Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844, 885 (1997) (finding a sta......
  • Constitutionality of sexually oriented speech: obscenity, indecency, and child pornography
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIII-2, January 2022
    • 1 Enero 2022
    ...legitimate purpose that the [regulation] was enacted to serve.” Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844, 874–75 (1997). 68. City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 289–303 (2000) (plurality opinion). 69. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41, 46–48 (1986) (zoning ordinance that restri......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...54 F.3d 261 (6th Cir. 1995), 1193 Erb v. Morasch, 177 U.S. 584, 20 S.Ct. 819, 44 L.Ed. 897 (1900), 865 Erie, City of, v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000), 946, 1366, 1373, 1375-77, Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938)......
  • Common Procedural Issues
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Interlocking Directorates. Handbook on Section 8 of the Clayton Act
    • 5 Diciembre 2011
    ...216, 222 (2000) (quoting United States v. Phosphate Exp. Ass’n, 393 U.S. 199, 203 (1968)); see also, e.g. , City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 287 (2000) (ruling that the “underlying concern” in determining mootness is that “there is no reasonable expectation that the wrong will be r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 provisions
  • Chapter 102, HB 23
    • United States
    • Ohio Session Laws
    • 1 Enero 2005
    ...incorporated inthe cases of City of Littleton, Colorado v. Z.J. Gifts D-4,L.L.C. (2004), 541 U.S. 774, City of Erie v. Pap'sA.M. (2000), 529 U.S. 277; Barnes v. Glen Theatre,Inc. (1991), 501 U.S. 560; City of Renton v. PlaytimeTheatres, Inc. (1986), 475 U.S. 41; Young v. American MiniTheatr......
  • Chapter 541, SB 1263 – Zoning
    • United States
    • Tennessee Session Laws
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...to the general assembly, and in the cases of City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002); City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986); Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 (1976); Barnes v. Glen T......
  • Chapter 227, HB 2490 – sex offenders; annual community notification (NOW: sexually oriented business; location; penalty
    • United States
    • Arizona Session Laws
    • 1 Enero 2006
    ...and on findings discussed in cases, including City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002), PAP's A.M. v. City of Erie, 529 U.S. 277 (2002), City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986), California v. Larue, 409 U.S. 109 (1972), Gammoh v. City of La Habra......
  • Act 387, HB 1536 – TO LIMIT THE LOCATION OF ADULT-ORIENTED BUSINESSES IN PROXIMITY TO LOCATIONS FREQUENTED BY CHILDREN
    • United States
    • Arkansas Session Laws
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...and on findings discussed in cases, including City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002), Erie v. PAP's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000), City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986), and Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 (1976), the General Assembl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT