Andrews v. Andrews, 50A03-8802-CV-61
| Decision Date | 05 December 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 50A03-8802-CV-61,50A03-8802-CV-61 |
| Citation | 531 N.E.2d 219 |
| Parties | In re the Marriage of George J. ANDREWS, Appellant (Respondent Below), v. Diana L. ANDREWS, Appellee (Petitioner Below). |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Eugene N. Chipman, Sr., Plymouth, for appellant.
David R. Holmes, Bremen, for appellee.
George Andrews appeals the trial court's order to pay for one half of the outstanding medical bills for his adopted daughter, A., asserting error in that the child's mother did not seek medical attention through the child's insurance policy and did not contact George prior to incurring the medical expenses. Thus, the following issue is before us:
Whether the court erred by ordering the non-custodial parent to pay half of his adopted daughter's unpaid medical expenses when the custodial parent did not seek medical attention under the child's insurance carrier?
Reversed.
While George Andrews was married to Diana, he adopted her daughter, A. Upon their divorce, Diana was awarded custody of A.; the court ordered George to provide medical or health insurance for A. Accordingly, George obtained Blue Cross/Blue Shield insurance and made payments on the policy.
However, when it became necessary to enroll A. in a hospital for drug and alcohol abuse, Diana neither contacted George, nor enrolled A. in a hospital whose expenses would be fully covered by A.'s Blue Cross/Blue Shield policy. Such a hospital was the Koala Center in Plymouth, Indiana, approximately thirty minutes from Diana's home in Mishawaka.
Instead, Diana sent A. to hospitals in Illinois, incurring bills of approximately $34,000 which would not be fully covered by A.'s insurance policy. Therefore, Diana petitioned the court to order George to pay at least one-half of that outstanding amount. However, although Diana did not enter a petition to modify the Divorce Decree, the court nonetheless ordered George to pay one-half of A.'s outstanding expenses. George contests this order.
Indiana statutory and case law support George's position; the order is clearly contrary to both. Indiana Code 31-1-11.5-17 provides:
Provision of an order with respect to child support ... may be modified or revoked.... (Emphasis added.)
West's AIC 31-1-11.5-17(a) (Supp.1988). Here, the court merely ordered George to pay certain medical expenses. The court did not modify the support order, and Diana did not request such a modification. In fact, the court's order disregards the original...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thompson v. Thompson
...those expenses to the requisite insurance company should be liable for the expenses. Br. of Appellant at 37 (citing Andrews v. Andrews, 531 N.E.2d 219, 220 (Ind.Ct.App.1988)). In support of his argument, Jack directs us to the trial court's March 14, 2002 order. However, the pages of this o......
-
Cavazzi v. Cavazzi, 49A05-9104-CV-123
...re Marriage of Wiley (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 315, 319. See also Smith v. Mobley (1990), Ind.App., 561 N.E.2d 504; Andrews v. Andrews (1988), Ind.App., 531 N.E.2d 219; Kruse v. Kruse (1984), Ind.App., 464 N.E.2d 934, trans. ...
-
Tigner v. Tigner
...questions of legal custody thereafter became moot. Appellant's App. at 4. 5. In this regard, this case differs from Andrews v. Andrews, 531 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct. App.1988), which Father cites in support of his argument. In Andrews, the father was ordered to provide medical insurance for his d......
-
Marriage of Ahrens, In re, 92CA0145
...psychological counseling services are not uninsured, extraordinary medical expenses pursuant to § 14-10-115(12)(b). See Andrews v. Andrews, 531 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.App.1988). The remaining question is whether circumstances exist that cause the psychological counseling expenses to be removed fro......