539 U.S. 306 (2003), 02-241, Grutter v. Bollinger

Docket Nº:No. 02-241
Citation:539 U.S. 306, 123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304, 71 U.S.L.W. 4498
Party Name:Grutter v. Bollinger
Case Date:June 23, 2003
Court:United States Supreme Court

Page 306

539 U.S. 306 (2003)

123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304, 71 U.S.L.W. 4498

Grutter

v.

Bollinger

No. 02-241

United States Supreme Court

June 23, 2003

Argued April 1, 2003

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

The University of Michigan Law School (Law School), one of the Nation's top law schools, follows an official admissions policy that seeks to achieve student body diversity through compliance with Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265. Focusing on students' academic ability coupled with a flexible assessment of their talents, experiences, and potential, the policy requires admissions officials to evaluate each applicant based on all the information available in the file, including a personal statement, letters of recommendation, an essay describing how the applicant will contribute to Law School life and diversity, and the applicant's undergraduate grade point average (GPA) and Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) score. Additionally, officials must look beyond grades and scores to so-called "soft variables," such as recommenders' enthusiasm, the quality of the undergraduate institution and the applicant's essay, and the areas and difficulty of undergraduate course selection. The policy does not define diversity solely in terms of racial and ethnic status and does not restrict the types of diversity contributions eligible for "substantial weight," but it does reaffirm the Law School's commitment to diversity with special reference to the inclusion of African-American, Hispanic, and Native-American students, who otherwise might not be represented in the student body in meaningful numbers. By enrolling a "critical mass" of underrepresented minority students, the policy seeks to ensure their ability to contribute to the Law School's character and to the legal profession. When the Law School denied admission to petitioner Grutter, a white Michigan resident with a 3.8 GPA and 161 LSAT score, she filed this suit, alleging that respondents had discriminated against her on the basis of race in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981; that she was rejected because the Law School uses race as a "predominant" factor, giving applicants belonging to certain minority groups a significantly greater chance of admission than students with similar credentials from disfavored racial groups; and that respondents had no compelling interest to justify that use of race. The District Court found the Law School's use of race as an admissions factor unlawful. The Sixth Circuit reversed, holding that Justice Powell's opinion in Bakke was binding precedent establishing

Page 307

diversity as a compelling state interest, and that the Law School's use of race was narrowly tailored because race was merely a "potential `plus' factor" and because the Law School's program was virtually identical to the Harvard admissions program described approvingly by Justice Powell and appended to his Bakke opinion.

Held:

the Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body is not prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause, Title VI, or § 1981. Pp. 322-344.

(a) In the landmark Bakke case, this Court reviewed a medical school's racial set-aside program that reserved 16 out of 100 seats for members of certain minority groups. The decision produced six separate opinions, none of which commanded a majority. Four Justices would have upheld the program on the ground that the government can use race to remedy disadvantages cast on minorities by past racial prejudice. 438 U.S. at 325. Four other Justices would have struck the program down on statutory grounds. Id. at 408. Justice Powell, announcing the Court's judgment, provided a fifth vote not only for invalidating the program, but also for reversing the state court's injunction against any use of race whatsoever. In a part of his opinion that was joined by no other Justice, Justice Powell expressed his view that attaining a diverse student body was the only interest asserted by the university that survived scrutiny. Id. at 311. Grounding his analysis in the academic freedom that "long has been viewed as a special concern of the First Amendment," id. at 312, 314, Justice Powell emphasized that the "`nation's future depends upon leaders trained through wide exposure' to the ideas and mores of students as diverse as this Nation." Id. at 313. However, he also emphasized that

[i]t is not an interest in simple ethnic diversity, in which a specified percentage of the student body is in effect guaranteed to be members of selected ethnic groups

that can justify using race. Id. at 315. Rather,

[t]he diversity that furthers a compelling state interest encompasses a far broader array of qualifications and characteristics of which racial or ethnic origin is but a single though important element.

Ibid. Since Bakke, Justice Powell's opinion has been the touchstone for constitutional analysis of race-conscious admissions policies. Public and private universities across the Nation have modeled their own admissions programs on Justice Powell's views. Courts, however, have struggled to discern whether Justice Powell's diversity rationale is binding precedent. The Court finds it unnecessary to decide this issue because the Court endorses Justice Powell's view that student body diversity is a compelling state interest in the context of university admissions. Pp. 322-325.

Page 308

(b) All government racial classifications must be analyzed by a reviewing court under strict scrutiny. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 227. But not all such uses are invalidated by strict scrutiny. Race-based action necessary to further a compelling governmental interest does not violate the Equal Protection Clause so long as it is narrowly tailored to further that interest. E.g., Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899, 908. Context matters when reviewing such action. See Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 343-344. Not every decision influenced by race is equally objectionable, and strict scrutiny is designed to provide a framework for carefully examining the importance and the sincerity of the government's reasons for using race in a particular context. Pp. 326-327.

(c) The Court endorses Justice Powell's view that student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify using race in university admissions. The Court defers to the Law School's educational judgment that diversity is essential to its educational mission. The Court's scrutiny of that interest is no less strict for taking into account complex educational judgments in an area that lies primarily within the university's expertise. See, e.g., Bakke, 438 U.S. at 319, n. 53 (opinion of Powell, J.). Attaining a diverse student body is at the heart of the Law School's proper institutional mission, and its "good faith" is "presumed" absent "a showing to the contrary." Id. at 318-319. Enrolling a "critical mass" of minority students simply to assure some specified percentage of a particular group merely because of its race or ethnic origin would be patently unconstitutional. E.g., id. at 307. But the Law School defines its critical mass concept by reference to the substantial, important, and laudable educational benefits that diversity is designed to produce, including cross-racial understanding and the breaking down of racial stereotypes. The Law School's claim is further bolstered by numerous expert studies and reports showing that such diversity promotes learning outcomes and better prepares students for an increasingly diverse workforce, for society, and for the legal profession. Major American businesses have made clear that the skills needed in today's increasingly global marketplace can only be developed through exposure to widely diverse people, cultures, ideas, and viewpoints. High-ranking retired officers and civilian military leaders assert that a highly qualified, racially diverse officer corps is essential to national security. Moreover, because universities, and in particular, law schools, represent the training ground for a large number of the Nation's leaders, Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 634, the path to leadership must be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity. Thus, the Law School has a compelling interest in attaining a diverse student body. Pp. 327-333.

Page 309

(d) The Law School's admissions program bears the hallmarks of a narrowly tailored plan. To be narrowly tailored, a race-conscious admissions program cannot "insulat[e] each category of applicants with certain desired qualifications from competition with all other applicants." Bakke, supra, at 315 (opinion of Powell, J.). Instead, it may consider race or ethnicity only as a "`plus' in a particular applicant's file" -- i.e., it must be

flexible enough to consider all pertinent elements of diversity in light of the particular qualifications of each applicant, and to place them on the same footing for consideration, although not necessarily according them the same weight,

id. at 317. It follows that universities cannot establish quotas for members of certain racial or ethnic groups or put them on separate admissions tracks. See id. at 315-316. The Law School's admissions program, like the Harvard plan approved by Justice Powell, satisfies these requirements. Moreover, the program is flexible enough to ensure that each applicant is evaluated as an individual and not in a way that makes race or ethnicity the defining feature of the application. See Bakke, supra, at 317 (opinion of Powell, J.). The Law School engages in a highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file, giving serious consideration to all the...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP
894 practice notes
  • Viewpoint Neutrality Now! v. Regents of The University of Minnesota, 020221 MNDC, 20-CV-1055 (PJS/TNL)
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of Minnesota
    • February 2, 2021
    ...2198, 2215-43 (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting) (arguing affirmative-action program was discriminatory); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 378 (2003) (Thomas, J., concurring in part) (arguing affirmative action undercuts equality). Limiting space in Coffman only to groups......
  • 158 Cal.App.4th 187, G037102, Lachtman v. Regents of University of California
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 2007
    ...of a university to make its own judgments as to education includes the selection of its student body.’” (Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) 539 U.S. 306, 329 [156 L.Ed.2d 304, 123 S.Ct. 2325].) In keeping with these principles, judicial review of academic decisions, such as the one denying Lachtma......
  • 227 Cal.App.4th 451, C066262, People v. Brown
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 2014
    ...differently absent adequate justification, the degree of which depends on the nature of the classification. (Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) 539 U.S. 306, 326-327 [156 L.Ed.2d 304, 123 S.Ct. 2325].) There are three levels of scrutiny. Most legislation is subject to a rational relationship level......
  • Fuquen v. Everitt, 030519 MDSCA, 313-2018
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • March 5, 2019
    ...to balance 'merits.'" In his brief, Father cites (incompletely) to Justice Thomas's dissent in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), contending that Justice Thomas wrote that, in Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429, 433 (1984), "the Court held that even t......
  • Free signup to view additional results
468 cases
  • Viewpoint Neutrality Now! v. Regents of The University of Minnesota, 020221 MNDC, 20-CV-1055 (PJS/TNL)
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit District of Minnesota
    • February 2, 2021
    ...2198, 2215-43 (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting) (arguing affirmative-action program was discriminatory); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 378 (2003) (Thomas, J., concurring in part) (arguing affirmative action undercuts equality). Limiting space in Coffman only to groups......
  • 158 Cal.App.4th 187, G037102, Lachtman v. Regents of University of California
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 2007
    ...of a university to make its own judgments as to education includes the selection of its student body.’” (Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) 539 U.S. 306, 329 [156 L.Ed.2d 304, 123 S.Ct. 2325].) In keeping with these principles, judicial review of academic decisions, such as the one denying Lachtma......
  • 227 Cal.App.4th 451, C066262, People v. Brown
    • United States
    • California California Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 2014
    ...differently absent adequate justification, the degree of which depends on the nature of the classification. (Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) 539 U.S. 306, 326-327 [156 L.Ed.2d 304, 123 S.Ct. 2325].) There are three levels of scrutiny. Most legislation is subject to a rational relationship level......
  • Fuquen v. Everitt, 030519 MDSCA, 313-2018
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • March 5, 2019
    ...to balance 'merits.'" In his brief, Father cites (incompletely) to Justice Thomas's dissent in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), contending that Justice Thomas wrote that, in Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429, 433 (1984), "the Court held that even t......
  • Free signup to view additional results
37 firm's commentaries
  • Skadden's 2013 Insights
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • January 18, 2013
    ...the Rehabilitation Act,18 and protected veterans under the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act.19 14 Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 330 (2003). 15 Exec. Order No. 11246, 30 Fed. Reg. 12,319 (Sept. 24, 1965), amended by Exec. Order No. 11375, 32 Fed. Reg. 14,303 (Oct. 13, ......
  • Higher Education Highlights - Spring 2012
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • May 18, 2012
    ...purpose.” Id. at 224. Years later, UT’s admissions process changed again following the Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), which effectively overruled Hopwood. Id. at 225. In Grutter, by a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld a race-conscious admissions ......
  • Supreme Court Opinion in Fisher v. University of Texas Affirmative Action Case
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 24, 2013
    ...which is committed to increasing racial minority enrollment, adopted its current program after this Court decided Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U. S. 306, upholding the use of race as one of many “plus factors” inan admissions program that considered the overall individual contribution of each ......
  • The IADC Amicus Brief Program: Its Increasing Success and Influence
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • February 13, 2014
    ...27, 2013, 3:11 PM), available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/2964.htm. 10 410 U.S. 113, 148–152 (1973). 11 410 U.S. 179, 195 (1973). 12 539 U.S. 306 (2003). 13 See Dan Schweitzer, Fundamentals of Preparing a United States Supreme Court Amicus Brief, 5 J. APP. PRAC. & PROCESS 523, 523–524 &......
  • Free signup to view additional results
385 books & journal articles
  • Stick Houses In Peshawbestown
    • United States
    • Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal Nbr. II-2, May 2004
    • May 1, 2004
    ...me as I wrestled with the ambiguities inherent in the statement of the topic for discussion. Id. [233] See Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) (upholding University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action policy from constitutional challenge); see also Brief for the Bay Mills Indi......
  • "A nation of minorities": race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 59 Nbr. 4, February 2007
    • February 1, 2007
    ...in the judgment) (internal quotation omitted). (1.) See, e.g., Johnson v. California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003); Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000); Adarand, 515 U.S. 200; Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993); Cit......
  • The Supreme Court and the Memory of Evil.
    • United States
    • February 1, 2019
    ...U.S. at 255 (Stevens, J., dissenting). (395.) Id. at 243. (396.) See generally Siegel, supra note 213. (397.) See Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 315-16, 343 (2003) (upholding a law school admissions program that considered an applicant's contribution to the racial diversity of the stud......
  • In defense of disparate impact: urban redevelopment and the Supreme Court's recent interest in the Fair Housing Act.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 79 Nbr. 3, June - June 2014
    • June 22, 2014
    ...Kenneth L. Karst, Equal Citizenship at Ground Level: The Consequences of Nonstate Action, 54 Duke L.J. 1591, 1606-07 (2005)). (227.) 539 U.S. 306, 343 (2003) (proposing a 25-year limit on affirmative action policies). (228.) 133 S. Ct. 2411 (2013). (229.) 392 U.S. 409, 442-43 (1968). Valeri......
  • Free signup to view additional results
3 provisions