Western Ry. of Alabama v. Turner
Decision Date | 09 February 1911 |
Parties | WESTERN RY. OF ALABAMA v. TURNER. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Macon County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.
Action by S.W. Turner against the Western Railway of Alabama for damages for killing a mule. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
The complaint is as follows: "(1) Plaintiff claims of the defendant, the Western Railway of Alabama, a corporation operating a railroad in Macon county, Alabama. the sum of $200, for that, whereas, the plaintiff was, on, to wit, the 27th day of September, 1909, the owner of a dark iron gray mule, which defendant company killed on said date about 1 3/4 miles east of Chehaw, Alabama, a station on defendant's line of said railway in said county; and plaintiff avers that the engine that was attached to the train of cars was so negligently operated by defendant's agent that the plaintiff's mule was killed; and plaintiff avers that said mule was killed on account of said negligence to plaintiff's damage," etc.
George P. Harrison, for appellant.
H. P Merritt, for appellee.
The complaint did not have to aver the name and position of the defendant's servants in operating the train; this suit being by a person who was not an employé. Birmingham Ry v. City Stable Co., 119 Ala. 615, 24 So. 558, 72 Am. St. Rep. 955; Abingdon Mills v. Grogan, 52 So. 596. Good pleading should require a more specific designation of the place of killing the mule than is set out in counts 2 and 3 of the complaint, but this point, while argued, is not raised by the demurrers. There was evidently an attempt to do so, but the demurrer as contained in the record says the complaint does not show with sufficient certainty "when" said injury occurred, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shelby Iron Co. v. Morrow
...negligent act of which complaint is made. B. R. & E. Co. v. City Stable Co., 119 Ala. 615, 619, 24 So. 558, 72 Am. St. Rep. 955; Western Ry. v. Turner, supra. defendant's counsel further challenged the complaint by demurrer on the ground that the negligent act averred did no proximately cau......
-
W. S. Fowler Rental Equipment Co. v. Skipper
...except within a circle around Sylacauga having a radius of three miles. The counts which this court criticized in Western Ry. of Ala. v. Turner, 170 Ala. 643, 54 So. 527, merely alleged that the accident occurred in Macon County, Alabama. This court did not criticize the count which alleged......
-
Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers
...shown. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Sunday, 254 Ala. 299, 48 So.2d 216; Shelby Iron Co. v. Morrow, supra; Western Railway Co. v. Turner, 170 Ala. 643, 54 So. 527. For overruling the demurrer to plea XI the judgment is reversed and the nonsuit is set aside and the cause restored to th......
-
Phillips v. Ashworth
... ... does not allege that the cause of action arose in Alabama, ... nor state the time with sufficient particularity. It is ... argued that as the common law ... and make its defense. L. & N. R. Co. v. Whitley, 213 ... Ala. 525, 105 So. 661; Western Ry. of Alabama v ... Turner, 170 Ala. 643, 54 So. 527 ... When ... time is not the ... ...