Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., CV-04-8400-SGL (RZX),

Decision Date26 March 2008
Docket NumberNo. CV-04-8776-SGL (RZX).,No. CV-04-8400-SGL (RZX),,CV-04-8400-SGL (RZX),,CV-04-8776-SGL (RZX).
Citation542 F.Supp.2d 1098
CourtU.S. District Court — Central District of California
PartiesJoanne SIEGEL and Laura Siegel Larson, Plaintiffs, v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.; Time Warner Inc.; and DC Comics, Defendants.

Marc Toberoff, Nicholas Calvin Williamson, Marc Toberoff Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

James D. Weinberger, Roger L Zissu, Fross Zelnick Lehrman and Zissu, New York, NY, Anjani Mandavia, Michael Bergman, Weissmann Wolff Bergman Coleman Grodin & Evall, Beverly Hills, CA, Patrick T. Perkins, Perkins Law Offices, Cold Spring, NY, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.

The termination provisions contained in the Copyright Act of 1976 have aptly been characterized as formalistic and complex such that authors, or their heirs, successfully terminating the grant to the copyright in their original work of authorship is a feat accomplished "against all odds." 2 WILLIAM F. PATRY, PATRY ON COPYRIGHT § 7:52 (2007).

In the present case, Joanne Siegel and Laura Siegel Larson, the widow and the daughter of Jerome Siegel, seek a declaration from the Court that they have overcome these odds and have successfully terminated the 1938 grant by Jerome Siegel and his creative partner, Joseph Shuster, of the copyright in their creation of the iconic comic book superhero "Superman," thereby recapturing Jerome Siegel's half of the copyright in the same. No small feat indeed. It requires traversing the many impediments — many requiring a detailed historical understanding both factually and legally of the events that occurred between the parties over the past seventy years — to achieving that goal and, just as importantly, reckoning with the limits of what can be gained through the termination of that grant.

Any discussion about the termination of the initial grant to the copyright in a work begins, as the Court does here, with the story of the creation of the work itself.

In 1932, Jerome Siegel and Joseph Shuster were teenagers at Glenville High School in Cleveland, Ohio. Siegel was an aspiring writer and Shuster an aspiring artist; what Siegel later did with his typewriter and Shuster with his pen would transform the comic book industry. The two met while working on their high school's newspaper where they discovered their shared passion for science fiction and comics, the beginning of a remarkable and fruitful relationship.

One of their first collaborations was publishing a mail-order fanzine titled "Science Fiction: The Advance Guard of Future Civilization." 1 In the January, 1933, issue, Siegel and Shuster's first superman character appeared in the short story "The Reign of the Superman," but in the form of a villain not a hero. The story told of a "mad scientist's experiment with a deprived man from the breadlines" that transformed "the man into a mental giant who then uses his new powers — the ability to read and control minds — to steal a fortune and attempt to dominate the world." (Deck Michael Bergman, Ex. HH at 1126). This initial superman character in villain trappings was drawn by Shuster as a baldheaded mad man.

A couple of months later it occurred to Siegel that re-writing the character as a hero, bearing little resemblance to his villainous namesake, "might make a great comic strip character." (Deck Michael Bergman, Ex. HH at 1126). Much of Siegel's desire to shift the role of his protagonist from villain to hero arose from Siegel's exposure to despair and hope: Despair created by the dark days of the Depression and hope through exposure to the "gallant, crusading heros" in popular literature and the movies. (Deck Michael Bergman, Ex. HH at 1126). The theme of hope amidst despair struck the young Siegel as an apt subject for his comic strip: "Superman was the answer — Superman aiding the downtrodden and oppressed." (Deck Michael Bergman, Ex. HH at 1126).

Thereafter, Siegel sat down to create a comic book version of his new character. While he labored over the script, Shuster began the task of drawing the panels visualizing that script. Titling it "The Superman," "[t]heir first rendition of the man of steel was a hulking strongman who wore a T-shirt and pants rather than a cape and tights." (Decl. Michael Bergman, Ex. HH at 1129). And he was not yet able to hurdle skyscrapers, nor was he from a far away planet; instead, he was simply a strong (but not extraordinarily so) human, in the mold of Flash Gordon or Tarzan, who combated crime. Siegel and Shuster sent their material to a publisher of comic books — Detective Dan — and were informed that it had been accepted for publication. Their success, however, was shortlived; the publisher later rescinded its offer to publish their submission. Crestfallen, Shuster threw into the fireplace all the art for the story except the cover (reproduced below), which Siegel rescued from the flames.

NOTE: OPINION CONTAINING TABLE OR OTHER DATA THAT IS NOT VIEWABLE

Undaunted, Siegel continued to tinker with his character, but decided to try a different publication format, a newspaper comic strip. The choice of crafting the material in a newspaper comic strip format was influenced both by the failure to get their earlier incarnation of the Superman character published by Detective Dan in a comic book format, and by the fact that, at the time, black-and-white newspaper comic strips — not comic books — were the most popular medium for comics. As one observer of the period has commented:

It is worth noting the extent to which early comic books were conjoined with newspaper strips of the day. The earliest comic books consisted of reprints of those newspaper strips, re-pasted into a comic book page format. When original material began appearing in comic book format, it was generally because companies that wished to publish comic books were unable to procure reprint rights to existing newspaper strips. The solution to this ... was to hire young [comic strip artists] to simulate the same kind of newspaper strip material.

(Decl. Mark Evanier, Ex. A at 5-6).

On a hot summer night in 1934, Siegel, unable to sleep, began brainstorming over plot ideas for this new feature when an idea struck him: "I was up late counting sheep and more and more ideas kept coming to me, and I wrote out several weeks of syndicate script for the proposed newspaper strip. When morning came, I dashed over to Joe [Shuster]'s place and showed it to him." (Decl. Michael Bergman, Ex. HH at 1129). Siegel re-envisioned his character in more of the mythic hero tradition of Hercules, righting wrongs in present-day society. His inspiration was to couple an exaggeration of the daring on-screen acrobatics performed by such actors as Douglas Fairbanks, Sr., with a pseudo-scientific explanation to make such fantastic abilities more plausible in the vein of Edgar Rice Burroughs' John Carter of Mars stories, and placing all of this within a storyline that was the reverse of the formula used in the Flash Gordon serials. The end product was of a character who is sent as an infant to Earth aboard a space ship from an unnamed distant planet (that had been destroyed by old age) who, upon becoming an adult, uses his superhuman powers (gained from the fact that his alien heritage made him millions of years more evolved than ordinary humans) to perform daring feats for the public good.

Siegel named his character "Superman." Unlike his previous incarnation, Siegel's new Superman character's powers and abilities were much more extraordinary and fantastic: Superhuman strength; the ability to leap 1/8th of a mile, hurdle a twenty-story building, and run faster than an express train; and nothing less than a bursting shell could penetrate his skin. Siegel placed his character in a very cosmopolitan environment that had the look and feel of mid-thirties America. He also humanized his character by giving his superhero an "ordinary person" alter ego: Mild-mannered, big-city newspaper reporter Clark Kent. Siegel developed this concept of Superman's secret identity both as a means for his superhero to maintain an inconspicuous position in everyday society and as a literary device to introduce a conflict — and the potential for story lines centered around that conflict — between the character's dual identities, a conflict played out no more dramatically than in the love "triangle" between the character's dual identities and another newspaper reporter, Lois Lane.

Shuster immediately turned his attention to giving life and color to Siegel's idea by drawing illustrations for the story. Shuster conceived of the costume for Siegel's Superman superhero — a cape and tight-fitting leotard with briefs, an "S" emblazoned on an inverted triangular crest on his chest, and boots as footwear. In contrast, he costumed Clark Kent in a nondescript suit, wearing black-rimmed glasses, combed black hair, and sporting a fedora. He drew Superman and his alter ego Clark Kent with chiseled features, gave him a hairstyle with a distinctive curl over his forehead, and endowed him with a lean, muscular physique. Clark Kent hid most of these physical attributes behind his wardrobe, which he could quickly doff revealing his Superman costume underneath when he was called to action by someone in need of his superpowers. One of the earliest of Shuster's of Superman and Clark Kent from this 1934 or 1935 period are depicted below:

NOTE: OPINION CONTAINING TABLE OR OTHER DATA THAT IS NOT VIEWABLE

The two then set about combining Siegel's literary material with Shuster's graphical representations. Together they crafted a comic strip consisting of several weeks' worth of material suitable for newspaper syndication. Siegel typed the dialogue and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Clancy v. Jack Ryan Enters., Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • February 10, 2021
    ...limitations on what authors (or their heirs) could gain from exercising the termination right. See Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1140 (C.D. Cal. 2008). The "termination of a grant under this section affects only those rights covered by the grants that aris......
  • Ray Charles Found. v. Robinson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • January 25, 2013
    ...the grant to the copyright in their original work of authorship” only do so “ ‘against all odds.’ ” Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entm't Inc., 542 F.Supp.2d 1098, 1101–02 (C.D.Cal.2008), rev'd on other grounds sub nom., Larson v. Warner Bros. Entm't, Inc., 504 Fed.Appx. 586, No. 11–55863, et al., ......
  • Sung v. Hamilton
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii
    • December 22, 2009
    ...precisely, and unequivocally for its acceptance to result in the formation of a binding contract." Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., 542 F.Supp.2d 1098, 1137 (C.D.Cal.2008); Molina v. Largosa, 465 P.2d at 296-97 (Abe, J., dissenting) (citation omitted). "It is an elementary rule of......
  • Warner Bros. Ent. Inc. v. X One X Productions
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 5, 2011
    ...visual appearance into the public domain. A situation somewhat similar to the one we face was presented in Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entm't Inc., 542 F.Supp.2d 1098 (C.D.Cal.2008). The defendants owned the copyright in two promotional announcements for Superman comics, published before the fir......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Copyright as Contract
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Journal of Intellectual Property Law (FC Access) No. 22-2, 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...assignments. See 17 U.S.C. §§ 203, 304(c). For an example of the complexities that can arise see Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entm't, Inc., 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (Cal. 2008). Classic Media, Inc. v. Mewborn, 532 F.3d 978 (C.D. Cal. 2008).99. See supra note 97. 100. See A.C. Pigou, Equilibrium Under......
  • Can't Buy Me Love, but You Can Buy My Copyrights (as Long as You Give Them Back): Finding Balance in the Era of Terminating Transfers
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 53, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...[14]Id. [15] Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entm't Inc., 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1117 (C.D. Cal. [16]See infra notes 23-37 and accompanying text. [17]See infra notes 38-122 and accompanying text. [18]See infra notes 123-39 and accompanying text. [19]See infra notes 140-57 and accompanying text. [20]S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT