Hill v. Crosby

Decision Date25 January 2006
Docket NumberNo. 05-8794 (05A676).,05-8794 (05A676).
PartiesHILL <I>v.</I> CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
126 S. Ct. 1189163 L. Ed. 2d 1144

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE KENNEDY, and by him referred to the Court, granted. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. Petitioner's brief to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, March 6, 2006. Respondents' brief to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 3, 2006. Reply brief, if any, to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 17, 2006. The stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Jackson v. Danberg
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Delaware
    • March 11, 2009
    ... ... that the United States Supreme Court had recently granted certiorari to resolve that very issue, the case was stayed until a decision issued in Hill v. McDonough, 5 05-8794, certiorari granted, 546 U.S. 1158, 126 S.Ct. 1189, 163 L.Ed.2d 1144 (2006). As part of that order, defendants were ... ...
  • WELLS v. Sec'y, Case No. 8:11-CV-766-T-30TBM
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • April 13, 2011
    ...(2011), and concludes that the petition is subject to summary dismissal as time barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). See Day v. McDonough, 126 S.Ct. 1675, 1684 (2006) (district courts are permitted to consider sua sponte the timeliness of a state inmate's habeas petition, but must accord the p......
  • Mosby v. Sachse, 4:15CV128 CEJ
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • January 20, 2015
    ...petitioner will be given the opportunity to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. See Day v. McDonough, 126 S. Ct. 1675, 1684 (2006) (district court must give notice to petitioner before sua sponte dismissing petition as time-barred). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ......
  • Hill v. Mcdonough
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • April 14, 2006
    ...05-8794. Supreme Court of United States. April 14, 2006 C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted sub nom. Hill v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., 546 U. S. 1158.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT