547 U.S. 1187 (2006), 05-969, Drogin v. Wen Ho Lee

Citation547 U.S. 1187, 126 S.Ct. 2351, 165 L.Ed.2d 294
Party NameBob DROGIN, H. Josef Herbert, and James Risen, petitioners, v. WEN HO LEE, et al.
Case DateJune 05, 2006
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

Page 1187

547 U.S. 1187 (2006)

126 S.Ct. 2351, 165 L.Ed.2d 294

Bob DROGIN, H. Josef Herbert, and James Risen, petitioners,

v.

WEN HO LEE, et al.

No. 05-969.

United States Supreme Court

June 5, 2006

Case below, Lee v. Department of Justice, 413 F.3d 53.

OPINION

[126 S.Ct. 2352] Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 books & journal articles
  • The diversity rationale for affirmative action in employment after Grutter: the case for containment.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 48 No. 3, December 2006
    • 1 Diciembre 2006
    ...U.S. at 330-31. (166.) The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1,126 S. Ct. 2351 (2006) (mere.), which deals with the application of the expanded Grutter diversity rationale to K-12 education. The Court's decision in that ......
  • Family Limited Partnership Formation: Dueling Dicta
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 35-1, September 2006
    • 1 Septiembre 2006
    ...of Rosen v. Comm'r, 91 T.C.M. (CCH) 1220, 1231-32 (2006); Estate of Abraham v. Comm'r, 408 F.3d 26, 37 (1st Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2351 (2006); Estate of Bigelow v. Comm'r, 89 T.C.M. (CCH) 954, 960 (2005); Estate of Bongard v. Comm'r, 124 T.C. 95, 113-15 (2005); Estate of Korb......
  • Umpires at bat: on integration and legitimation.
    • United States
    • Constitutional Commentary Vol. 24 No. 3, September 2007
    • 22 Septiembre 2007
    ...decrees. See Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1,426 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc), cert. granted, 126 S. Ct. 2351 (2006); McFarland v. Jefferson Co. Pub. Schs., 330 F. Supp. 2d 834 (W.D. Ky. 2004), aff'd, 416 F.3d 513 (6th Cir. 2005), cert. granted sub nom. Me......
  • Silencing Chicken Little: Options for School Districts After Parents Involved
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review No. 69-1, October 2008
    • 1 Octubre 2008
    ...ex. rel McFarland v. Jefferson County Pub. Sch., 416 F.3d 513 (6th Cir. 2005). [90] See Meredith v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ., 126 S. Ct. 2351 (2006); Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 126 S. Ct. 2351 (2006). [91] Parents Involved, 127 S. Ct. at 2751-52 (citin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT