Johnson v. State, 4 Div. 335
| Decision Date | 21 July 1989 |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 335 |
| Citation | 549 So.2d 636 |
| Parties | Allen JOHNSON v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Darron C. Hendley, Montgomery, for appellant.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Mary Ellen Forehand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Allen Johnson was indicted for the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. He was found "guilty as charged in the indictment" and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred to reversal in admitting evidence of the good character of one of the prosecuting witnesses when such witness' credibility and reputation for veracity had not been attacked. We agree.
The record reveals that the State called three witnesses. Ronnie Dees testified for the State that he bought crack or cocaine from the appellant. He further testified that he bought the drug with the knowledge of Lieutenant Sidney Jernigan of the Union Springs, Alabama, police department. He testified that Jernigan provided him with transportation to the drug transaction and also gave him $100 with which to purchase the drugs at issue. Jernigan parked near the scene of the sale. Jernigan corroborated this testimony and further testified that he observed Dees give something to the appellant and then observed the appellant give something to Dees. He further testified that he was approximately 40 to 50 feet from the location of the sale.
Although the appellant called three witnesses who testified to Dees's bad reputation in the community, there was no evidence presented which attacked or impeached Jernigan's credibility. During the cross-examination of two of these witnesses, the court allowed the witnesses to testify over the appellant's objection that Jernigan had a good reputation in the community and that they would believe Jernigan's testimony under oath. The third witness stated that he had not been able to form an opinion about Jernigan's reputation.
"[E]vidence to sustain the credibility of a witness or bolster his testimony is inadmissible on timely and appropriate objections thereto when his testimony has not been impeached or attacked." Gissendaner v. State, 54 Ala.App. 535, 536, 310 So.2d 255 (1975). See also Clark v. State, 56 Ala.App. 67, 318 So.2d 813 (1974), cert. quashed, 294 Ala. 493, 318 So.2d 822 (Ala.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 937, 96 S.Ct. 298, 46 L.Ed.2d 270 (1975). The mere...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Baxter v. State
...appellant cites Gissendaner v. State, 54 Ala. App. 535, 536, 310 So.2d 255 (1975) in support of his argument. See also Johnson v. State, 549 So.2d 636 (Ala.Cr.App.1989). Although the appellant cites correct legal principle, that principle is not applicable to the facts in this case. In the ......
-
Loggins v. State, CR-01-1804.
... ... Flumenbaum, New York, New York; Wilson Myers, Sr., Gulf Shores (withdrew 4"/27/04); and Talitha Powers Bailey, Birmingham, for appellant ... \xC2" ... , when the Alabama Supreme Court released its decision in Ex parte Johnson, 806 So.2d 1195 (Ala.2001), a subsequent Rule 32 petition was the stated ... ...
-
Matthews v. State
... ... to rule on the motion beyond 30 days, see Rule 24.4, Ala. R ... Crim. P., and the filing of such a motion tolls the ... ...