Krenkel v. Kerzner Intern. Hotels Ltd.

Decision Date19 August 2009
Docket NumberNo. 08-15971.,08-15971.
Citation579 F.3d 1279
PartiesDebbi KRENKEL, George Krenkel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KERZNER INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LIMITED, a Bahamian company, Kerzner International Bahamas Limited, a Bahamian company, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Joel S. Perwin, Joel S. Perwin, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Tracy Tatnall Segal, West Palm Beach, FL, Marc J. Gottleb, Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before EDMONDSON, BLACK and SILER,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case arises from Debbi Krenkel's slip and fall at the Atlantis Hotel in The Bahamas.1 She and her husband George appeal the district court's dismissal of their claims, based on a forum-selection clause the Krenkels signed upon check-in at the hotel. For the following reasons, we affirm the dismissal.

I.

In May 2007, the Krenkels traveled from New Jersey, where they reside, to The Bahamas. Upon check-in at the Atlantis, the Krenkels executed an agreement containing a forum-selection clause. The clause read:

I agree that any claims I may have against the Resort Parties resulting from any events occurring in The Bahamas shall be governed by and constructed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas, and further, irrevocably agree to the Supreme Court of The Bahamas as the exclusive venue for any such proceedings whatsoever.

On May 16, 2007, Mrs. Krenkel was injured when she slipped and fell on an outdoor path in the pool lagoon area. Thereafter, the Krenkels brought suit against Kerzner International Hotels Limited and Kerzner International Bahamas Limited (Kerzner Defendants), the entities that own and operate the Atlantis on Paradise Island in The Bahamas. Subsequently, the district court granted the Kerzner Defendants' motion to dismiss on the basis of the forum-selection clause, declining to address their alternative motion for dismissal based on forum non conveniens.

II.

We review de novo the enforceability of forum-selection and choice-of-law provisions in international agreements. Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285, 1290-91 (11th Cir. 1998). Forum-selection clauses are presumptively valid and enforceable unless the plaintiff makes a "strong showing" that enforcement would be unfair or unreasonable under the circumstances. See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 593-95, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1527-28, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991); M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 1913, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972). A forum-selection clause will be invalidated when: (1) its formation was induced by fraud or overreaching; (2) the plaintiff would be deprived of its day in court because of inconvenience or unfairness; (3) the chosen law would deprive the plaintiff of a remedy; or (4) enforcement of the clause would contravene public policy. Lipcon, 148 F.3d at 1296 (citing Shute, 499 U.S. at 594-95, 111 S.Ct. at 1528). In determining whether there was fraud or overreaching in a non-negotiated forum-selection clause, we look to whether the clause was reasonably communicated to the consumer. A useful two-part test of "reasonable communicativeness" takes into account the clause's physical characteristics and whether the plaintiffs had the ability to become meaningfully informed of the clause and to reject its terms.2

The forum-selection clause the Krenkels signed was not hidden or ambiguous. Rather, it was on a one-page form entitled "Acknowledgment, Agreement and Release" that contained only eight paragraphs, was set apart in a separate paragraph, was in legible type in the same font and type size as the surrounding paragraphs, and began with the words "I agree." The language of the clause was plain and sufficiently gave the Krenkels notice they were agreeing to litigate any disputes that might arise from their visit in The Bahamas. Moreover, the agreement notified the Krenkels in bold, capitalized letters to "READ BEFORE SIGNING." Had the Krenkels adhered to this notice, their assumption the agreement pertained only to water sports activities would have been disproved, as other paragraphs of the agreement addressed such topics as newspaper delivery and liability for the hotel bill. See Nash v. Kloster Cruise A/S, 901 F.2d 1565, 1567 (11th Cir. 1990) (holding a similar warning — "read the terms and conditions" — provided reasonable notice).

The Krenkels contend their ability to become meaningfully informed of and have the opportunity to reject the terms of the forum-selection clause was impeded because the front desk personnel confirmed their assumption that the agreement pertained only to water sports activities.3 We find their argument unpersuasive. In August 2004, the Krenkels visited the Atlantis and signed a form containing a nearly identical forum-selection clause. They should not have been surprised, then, that they would be asked in May 2007 to consent to The Bahamas as the forum for any disputes arising from their visit. The Krenkels' first visit gave them a reasonable opportunity to consider and reject the forum-selection clause at issue. The forum-selection clause was reasonably communicated to the Krenkels, so we conclude it was not signed as a result of fraud or overreaching.4

III.

The Krenkels have not made a sufficient showing to overcome the presumptively valid and enforceable forum-selection clause they signed upon check-in at the Atlantis. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the Krenkels' suit.

AFFIRMED.

* Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

1. The Southern District of Florida has seen many cases concerning accidents occurring at the Atlantis or its affiliates in The Bahamas. See, e.g., Larsen v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd., ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
146 cases
  • Veros Energy, LLC v. GCube Ins. Servs., Inc. (In re Veros Energy, LLC)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • April 26, 2018
    ...would deprive the plaintiff of a remedy; or (4) enforcement of the clause would contravene public policy." Krenkel v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd. , 579 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2009).29 Although the analysis of a motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) is not identical to the forum non......
  • Wade Park Land Holdings, LLC v. Kalikow
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • February 24, 2021
    ...Clause in the LLCA Mandatory forum-selection clauses are "presumptively valid and enforceable." Krenkel v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd. , 579 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2009). However, that presumption may be overcome by a "strong showing" indicating that (1) its formation was induced by fraud......
  • AFC Franchising, LLC v. Purugganan
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 11, 2022
    ...this determination, "we look to whether the [forum-selection] clause was reasonably communicated." Krenkel v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd. , 579 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). This Court's "two-part test of ‘reasonable communicativeness’ takes into account the clause's physical......
  • Prof'l Led Lighting, Ltd. v. Aadyn Tech., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • November 21, 2014
    ...find the use of "shall" and "exclusive jurisdiction" indicative of a mandatory forum selection clause. See Krenkel v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd., 579 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2009) (finding forum selection clause with mandatory language valid and enforceable); Barilotti v. Island Hotel Co.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Chapter § 4.04 LIABILITY OF HOTELS AND RESORTS FOR COMMON TRAVEL PROBLEMS
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Travel Law
    • Invalid date
    ...slips and falls in bathroom but doesn't know why; summary judgment for defendant); Krenkel v. Kerzner International Hotels Limited, 579 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2009) (guest slips and falls on outdoor path in pool lagoon area; Bahamas forum selection and choice of law clause in hotel contract e......
  • Chapter § 1.03 TRAVEL ABROAD, SUE AT HOME
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Travel Law
    • Invalid date
    ...(U.S. citizen injured at resort in Nassau, Bahamas, forum selection clause not enforced); Krenkel v. Kerzner International Hotels, LTD., 579 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2009) (upon arriving at Atlantis resort tourists signed hotel registration form containing Bahamas forum-selection and choice of ......
  • Admiralty
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 64-4, June 2013
    • Invalid date
    ...at 1244.50. Id.; see also 46 U.S.C. § 30509.51. Estate of Myhra, 695 F.3d at 1244. 52. Id. (quoting Krenkel v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd., 579 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2009)).53. Id. at 1244-45.54. Id. at 1245.55. Id.56. Id. at 1246.57. Id. (quoting Krenkel, 579 F.3d at 1281).58. Id.59. Id......
  • Admiralty
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 71-4, June 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...19 [hereinafter The Athens Convention]).55. Id.56. Id. at 199. 57. Id. at 200 (quoting, inter alia, Krenkel v. Kerzner Int'l Hotels Ltd., 579 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2009)).58. Id. (internal citations omitted).59. Id. at 200.60. Id. at 200-201.61. Id. at 201.62. Id. at 202 (noting that t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT