Venning v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Decision Date | 31 August 1907 |
Parties | VENNING v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Clarendon County.
Action by S. R. Venning against the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. From circuit judgment affirming judgment of the magistrate, defendant appeals. Reversed.
The following are the statutes referred to and considered in the opinion:
"When under contract for shipment of freight or express over two or more common carriers, the responsibility of each or any of them shall cease upon delivery to the connecting line 'in good order,' and if such freight or express has been lost, damaged or destroyed, it shall be the duty of the initial, delivering or terminal road, upon notice of such loss, damage or destruction being given to it by the shippers, consignee, or their assigns, to adjust such loss or damage with the owners of said goods within forty days and upon failure to discharge such duty within forty days after such notice, or to trace such freight and inform the said party so notifying when, where and by which carrier the said freight or express was lost, damaged or destroyed within said forty days, then said carrier shall be liable for all such loss, damage or destruction in the same manner and to the same extent as if such loss, damage or destruction occurred on its lines: Provided, that if such initial, terminal or delivering road can prove that, by the exercise of due diligence, it has been unable to trace the line upon which such loss, damage or destruction occurred, it shall thereupon be excused from liability under this section."
P. A. Willcox, Henry E. Davis, and Wilson & Du Rant, for appellant.
W. C. Davis, for respondent.
The Belknap Hardware Company, in January, 1905, delivered to the Southern Railway Company at Louisville, Ky., a steel range and warming closet, consigned to the plaintiff at Manning, S.C. The defendant, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, the terminal carrier, delivered to the plaintiff the warming closet only, and this action was brought in a magistrate's court to recover $21 for failure to deliver the range and $50, the statutory penalty for failing to adjust and pay the claim within 90 days. The allegation of the complaint is that the Southern Railway Company undertook carriage and delivery of the goods to Manning, S. C., for itself and the defendant, its connecting line. But the bill of lading expressly provides: "No carrier shall be liable for loss or damage not occurring on its portion of the route." The defendant's clerk, whose duty it was to check the contents of cars turned over by the Southern Railway to the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad at Columbia, testified the range was marked short on his book and was never received by the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad. The magistrate rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $21 for failing to adjust and pay the claim in 90 days, and on appeal the circuit court affirmed the judgment.
1. It was held in Willett v. Railway Co., 66 S.C. 477, 45 S.E. 93, that when property received by the initial carrier in good condition is delivered by the terminal carrier in damaged condition, the burden is on the terminal carrier to show the damage did not occur on its own line. The same principle was held to apply to the loss of a part of a car load of goods in Walker v. Railway Co., 76...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Daughty v. Northwestern R. Co. of South Carolina
... ... Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company ... issued its bill of lading to S. Hirschman ... could not affect its liability to plaintiff (Venning v ... Railroad Co., 78 S.C. 42, 58 S.E. 983, 12 L. R. A. [N ... S.] ... ...
-
Copeland Co. v. Davis
... ... 36, 58 S.E. 927, 125 Am. St. Rep ... 762; Venning v. Railroad ... [119 S.E. 21] ... Co., 78 S.C. 42, 58 S.E. 983, 12 L ... ...
- Charles v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
-
Smith v. Southern Ry. Co.
... ... shipments. Venning v. Railway, 78 S.C. 42, 58 S.E ... 983, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1217, 125 ... ...