582 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1978), 78-5288, United States v. Rodriguez

Docket Nº:78-5288
Citation:582 F.2d 1015
Party Name:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Case Date:October 27, 1978
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1015

582 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1978)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Miguel RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-5288

[*]

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

October 27, 1978

Miguel A. Suarez, P. A., Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Jack V. Eskenazi, U. S. Atty., Paul D. Lazarus, Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. U. S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Page 1016

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A jury found Miguel Rodriguez guilty of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, distribution of heroin, and conspiracy both to possess and to distribute heroin. Appellant, through different counsel than the attorney who represented him at all proceedings in the District Court, appeals on the sole ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial. The law of this Circuit is that claims of inadequate representation cannot be determined on direct appeal where such claims were not raised before the District Court and there has been no opportunity to develop and include in the record evidence bearing on the merits of the allegations. See United States v. Prince, 5 Cir., 1972, 456 F.2d 1070; United States v. Hunter, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 296. The convictions are affirmed without prejudice to the right of Rodriguez to raise...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP