Hunt v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
Decision Date | 11 July 1991 |
Citation | 584 So.2d 1367 |
Parties | , 60 USLW 2066, 22 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,171 Guy HUNT, as Governor of the State of Alabama v. CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. James M. SIZEMORE, Jr., as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Revenue; and the Alabama Department of Revenue v. CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. The ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al. 1901043, 1901044 and 1901106. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Bert S. Nettles, Alton B. Parker, Jr. and Kenneth O. Simon of Spain, Gillon, Grooms, Blan & Nettles, Birmingham, and H. William Wasden, Legal Advisor to the Governor, Montgomery, for appellant Governor Guy Hunt.
William D. Coleman and Jim B. Grant, Jr., of Capell, Howard, Knabe & Cobbs, Montgomery, for appellant James M. Sizemore, Jr., Com'r of Revenue.
J. Wade Hope, Montgomery, for appellant Alabama Dept. of Revenue.
Fournier J. Gale III, H. Thomas Wells, Jr. and J. Alan Truitt of Maynard, Cooper, Frierson & Gale, Birmingham, and Oakley Melton of Melton, Espy, Williams and Hayes, Montgomery, for appellee/cross-appellant Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
In April 1990, the Alabama Legislature enacted Act No. 90-326 (the "Act"), effective July 15, 1990, Code of Ala. 1975, § 22-30B-1 et seq. (Supp.1990), which was signed into law by the Governor. The Act imposes two fees on the disposal of hazardous waste at commercial facilities in Alabama. A "Base Fee" of $25.60 per ton was imposed on all waste and substances disposed of at commercial facilities, regardless of the state of origin. An "Additional Fee" of $72.00 per ton was imposed on all waste and substances generated outside the State of Alabama and disposed of at Alabama facilities.
The Act also included a "Cap" provision, limiting the amount of hazardous waste that can be disposed of at any affected facility in any one-year period. Under the Cap provision, the amount of hazardous waste disposed of during the first year that the Act's new fees are in effect (the "benchmark period"), becomes the permanent ceiling in subsequent years. The Cap provision applies only to commercial facilities that dispose of over 100,000 tons of waste per year. The facility at Emelle, Alabama, is the only facility in this category.
On June 5, 1990, Chemical Waste Management, Inc. ("CWM"), filed suit for declaratory relief against the Alabama Department of Revenue, James M. Sizemore, Jr., as Commissioner, and Guy Hunt as Governor ("the State"). The suit challenged the constitutionality of Act No. 90- 326, Code of Alabama 1975, § 22-30B-1 et seq. CWM alleged that the provisions of the Act violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution; the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution and its equivalents under the State Constitution; and the Due Process Clause of the State Constitution. CWM further contends that the Act is a "revenue bill" enacted during the last five days of the legislative session in violation of Article IV, § 70, of the Alabama Constitution. CWM further contends that the Cap provision violates the Commerce, Due Process, and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution and is preempted by various federal statutes. 1
CWM also sought a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the State from enforcing, applying, or attempting to enforce the Act. Dr. Claude Earl Fox, state health officer, was allowed to intervene on behalf of the State Board of Health.
Governor Hunt filed a counterclaim for declaratory relief, asking that the trial court find and declare the Act constitutional. On February 28, 1991, the trial judge, the Honorable Joseph D. Phelps, declared the Base Fee and Cap provisions of the Act to be valid and constitutional. However, he declared the Additional Fee imposed on out-of-state generated waste to be impermissible and invalid as a violation of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
The State appeals only that aspect of the trial judge's order pertaining to the Additional Fee. CWM appeals from the trial judge's holding that the Base Fee and Cap are constitutional. We affirm the trial judge's holdings that the Base Fee and Cap provisions of the Act are valid and constitutional. We reverse the holding of the trial judge that the Additional Fee violates the Commerce Clause.
The legislative findings underlying Act No. 90-326, as quoted by the trial judge in his order of February 28, 1991, are as follows:
The pertinent provisions of Act No. 90-326 are as follows:
Act § 3(a), Code § 22-30B-2(a) (the Base Fee):
"In addition to other fees levied, there is hereby levied a fee to be paid by the operators of each commercial site for the disposal of hazardous waste, or hazardous substances in the amount of $25.60 per ton for all waste or substances disposed of at such site."
Act § 3(b), Code § 22-30B-2(b) (The Additional Fee):
"For waste and substances which are generated outside of Alabama and disposed of at commercial sites for the disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous substances in Alabama, an additional fee shall be levied at the rate of $72.00 per ton."
Act § 9, Code § 22-30B-2.3 (the Cap Provision):
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Comr's of County of Rogers
...Jersey regulation requiring transporters of recyclable hazardous waste to label and identify the waste); Hunt v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc., 584 So.2d 1367, 1381-82 (Ala.1991) (upholding Alabama's "Cap" provision, limiting the amount of hazardous waste that can annually be disposed of ......
-
Chemical Waste Management, Inc v. Hunt
...Corp. v. Florida Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 496 U.S. 18, 31, 110 S.Ct. 2238, 2247, 110 L.Ed.2d 17. Pp. 348-349. 584 So.2d 1367 (Ala.1991), reversed and WHITE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BLACKMUN, STEVENS, O'CONNOR, SCALIA, KENNEDY, SOUTER, and THOMAS, J......
-
Becton v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.
...private rights of action for environmental damage if they choose to do so." (Emphasis added.) See, also, Hunt v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc., 584 So.2d 1367, 1381-83 (Ala.1991), rev'd, 504 U.S. 334, 112 S.Ct. 2009, 119 L.Ed.2d 121 (1992), in which this Court, resolving the issue of the ......
-
Ex parte Gurganus
...always bound by the decisions of the lower federal courts on federal questions, see e.g., Hunt v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc., 584 So.2d 1367 (Ala.1991) (Houston, J., concurring in the judgment) (federal appeals court's decision bearing on the constitutionality of an Alabama statute not......
-
Congress, the courts, and solid waste transport: good fences don't always make good neighbors.
...with Equal Protection. An Equal Protection claim was rejected by the Alabama Supreme Court in Hunt v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc., 584 So.2d 1367, 1378-79 (Ala. 1991), rev,d on other grounds, 112 S. Ct. 2009 (1992) (the Supreme Court's reversal was based on the dormant Commerce Clause).......