Brooks v. Raynolds

Decision Date24 December 1893
Docket Number110.
Citation59 F. 923
PartiesBROOKS et al. v. RAYNOLDS.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

The appellee, F. A. Raynolds, recovered, in 1888, a judgment in a court of law for $44,941.60 against Cassius B. Hanna and his wife, Hattie L. Hanna. An execution issued, and has been returned nulla bona. Upon this footing this bill was filed to subject an alleged equitable interest arising under certain trusts created by the will of Robert Hanna, father of Cassius. The executor, J. Twing Brooks, denies that Cassius Hanna has any estate or interest under the will of Robert Hanna which may be subjected by his creditors. The circuit court held, on final hearing, that Cassius had an equitable interest, until the final distribution of the estate of Robert Hanna, in an undivided one-fourth of the net income thereof, which might be subjected to the payment of the complainant's judgment. Both parties appealed; the complainant contending that Cassius has an undivided half interest in the income which may be subjected by his creditors; the executor insisting that he has no interest under the bill which can be subjected by complainant.

The clauses of the will which bear upon the questions for consideration are these:

'Item 4. Excepting the household articles devised to my wife in foregoing item three, I devise and bequeath to my executor hereinafter named, in trust to be disposed of by him as hereinafter provided, all my property, real and personal of any and every description, wherever the same may be situated, and however my interest or title in the same evidenced; I hereby giving my said executor full, ample and complete power to manage, direct, and control the same and every part thereof, according to his own best judgment and discretion; also, to rent, sell, or improve the whole, or any part, of my real estate, and in such manner, and upon such terms and conditions, as he may think best, and, in case of sale, either at public or at private sale, as he may deem best, and to make, execute, and deliver deed or deeds in fee for the same. I also hereby authorize and empower him to dispose of, whenever, in his judgment, it will be best for my estate so to do, any and all of my personal property, stocks, bonds, chattels of every kind, either at public or private sale, and to invest, and from time to time reinvest, in such manner, and in such property, whether real or personal, as he may deem best, the proceeds arising from the rent or sale of my real, and the income or sale of my personal, estate; and, in case of purchase of real estate by him as aforesaid, I direct that the title to the same be taken to himself as executor and trustee of my estate,--it being my wish and purpose to invest, my executor hereinafter named with power to manage and control my entire estate according to his own judgment and discretion, the same as I could do myself, if living, and subject only to, and be restrained by, the special limitations herein imposed and expressed by me.'
'Item 7. I hereby authorize and direct my executor, as soon as convenient after my death, and in case my son, Cassius, shall so request, to purchase a home for him at a cost not to exceed twelve thousand dollars, taking title to himself as executor and trustee as aforesaid, the same to be kept as and for a home for Cassius, free of rent, so long as he desires so to occupy the same; but in the final settlement of my estate, as hereinafter provided, I direct that the money expended by my executor in insurance, taxes, and assessments on the home so occupied by Cassius, together with six per cent. interest per annum on the cost of said home for the time it shall be so occupied by him, shall be deducted from the amount that is to be paid to Cassius or his children, as is hereinafter provided, or, if my said executor shall deem it best to deduct the amount of said annual insurance, taxes, assessments, and interest from the annual income that is to be paid to Cassius or his children, as hereinafter provided, he is hereby authorized and directed so to do.
'Item 8. So far as the same is practical, in conformity with the other provisions of this will, I desire the income of my estate each year to be applied as follows: First, to the payment of taxes, insurance, assessments, and repairs that may be levied or become necessary to be made on any part of my estate, together with the necessary expenses of the administration of the same, including the compensation hereinafter provided to be paid to my executor. Secondly, to the payment of the annuity of two thousand dollars hereinbefore provided for my wife, Harriet A. Hanna. Thirdly, after the payment of the items hereinbefore mentioned, I desire the remainder of the yearly income or increase of my estate that shall be collected or received to be divided into two equal parts, one part to be expended by my said executor for the benefit of my son, Cassius, and his family, so long as he (Cassius) shall live; or, in case my said executor deem it prior and best, but in no event otherwise, he may pay the whole or any part of such portion of the yearly income of my estate (subject, however, to the deduction hereinbefore provided to be made of insurance, taxes, assessments, and interest on the cost of the home to be proved for him as mentioned in item 7) to my son, Cassius, in cash. The other of the said equal parts of which the net yearly income of my estate is to be divided as provided in this section I direct my executor to expend for the benefit of the children of my deceased daughter, Arrial T. Whitaker, in such manner that each of the children shall have an equal and the same portion of said part with the other. In case any of said children of my daughter, Arrial, should die without issue before the final division of my estate, then the share of the income of my estate of such child or children so dying shall be divided between the other children of my daughter, Arrial, or the issue of them, they in such to take per stirpes and not per capita; and in such case any of the said children of my daughter, Arrial, should die before the final distribution of my estate, leaving issue, I direct that the share of the income of my estate which should be coming to such child of Arrial if living shall be paid to the issue of such child, share and share alike; and I hereby authorize my executor to pay in cash, if he shall deem best, the whole or any part of such share of the income of my estate as may be due to each of the children of my daughter, Arrial, as aforesaid, he to take, in such case, the receipt of the guardian or such other person who, for the time being, may be charged with the care or custody of said children, or either of them, for any payment so made; and in the expenditure of income for the benefit of my son, Cassius, and his family, as well as for the children of my daughter, Arrial, I desire my executor to have in view the maintenance and education of my grandchildren on a scale comporting with their condition and rank in life; and if, in the judgment of my said executor, the net annual income of my estate, as above described, cannot all be properly and judicially expended or advanced to Cassius and his family and to the children of Arrial, as hereinbefore described, I authorize and direct my executor to invest such surplus as may remain after what he deems a reasonable expenditure has been made for the benefit of the child or grandchild who would be entitled to it under the foregoing plan of distribution.

'Item 9. I will and direct that my executor shall continue to control and manage my estate, and distribute and invest the annual income of my estate, as hereinbefore provided, from year to year, until the youngest child of my daughter Arrial, then living, shall come of age, or until such further period as, in his opinion, the welfare of my son, Cassius, or of my grandchildren, will be thereby promoted, and whenever it shall so seem prudent to my executor, but in no event until then. I authorize and direct him to divide and distribute the whole of my estate among my grandchildren, share and share alike, to each that may be living at the time of such distribution, or if, before such final distribution, any of my said grandchildren shall have died leaving issue, the issue of such deceased grandchild shall take the share that would be due to such grandchild if he or she were living, share and share alike. And I hereby authorize my executor, if at any time it shall seem suitable and prudent to him, to advance any portion of the final share of my estate to either of my grandchildren that would be due to them under the plan of distribution herein provided, and in such final settlement I direct my said executor to invest a portion of the share hereinbefore provided for each of my grandchildren in a home for such grandchild, in which said child shall have a life estate, with the remainder to his or her heirs, it being my wish and purpose that each of my said grandchildren shall be secured in a home beyond any contingency during the period of his or her life; provided, however, that such final distribution of my estate shall in no event be made during the lifetime of my wife, Harriet A. Hanna, nor shall advances be made to my grandchildren, as hereinbefore provided, to such an extent as to impair the annuity of two thousand dollars which is to be paid to my wife as aforesaid: and provided, further, that before any such advances are made, or before any advances are made as hereinafter provided may be made, to my son, Cassius, for the benefit of himself and his children, and in any event before the final distribution of the principal of my estate, as aforesaid, shall be made, I wish and direct my executor to ascertain the amount of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Honnett v. Williams
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • 28 Enero 1899
    ...the instrument declare in terms that the property is to be held free from creditors, if such intent is sufficiently manifest. 4 F. 136; 59 F. 923; 135 Pa.St. 585; 8 Bush, 661; 79 Ky. 5. The trustee and adult beneficiaries had no power to, sell as long as there was a minor within an indefini......
  • In re Evans
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Sixth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • 5 Agosto 1988
    ...courts but it was uncertain whether equity had jurisdiction to levy on equitable interests in satisfaction of debt. See Brooks v. Raynolds, 59 F. 923, 939 (6th Cir.1893); McKeldin v. Gouldy, 91 Tenn. 677, 20 S.W. 231 (1892). See also Malone, T.H., "Distinctive Features of the Tennessee Law ......
  • The Owego
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 11 Mayo 1923
  • Smith v. Smith
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kansas
    • 3 Julio 1916
    ...Neither did the children have an absolute right to a fixed and definite share of the income during the continuance of the trust. [Brooks v. Raynolds, 59 F. 923, l. c. 934; v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 78 Conn. 81, l. c. 84-5; Carney v. Kain, 40 W.Va. 758, l. c. 804-5.] Inasmuch as th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT