Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Automo
| Decision Date | 17 March 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 09-55123.,09-55123. |
| Citation | 598 F.3d 1115 |
| Parties | Stuart CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Stuart CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-55123.
United States Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 5, 2010.
Filed March 17, 2010.
Don Howarth, Howarth & Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Kevin J. Dunne, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, San Francisco, CA, (argued); Kirk C. Jenkins, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Chicago, IL, for the defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-cv-03184-GAF-E, Central District of California, Los Angeles.
Before PAMELA ANN RYMER and KIM McLANE WARD LAW, Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, * Senior District Judge.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 596 F.Supp.2d 1314 (C.D.Cal.2008), attached as Appendix A.
AFFIRMED.
--------
Notes:
*. The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
--------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Barron v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
...1-1 at 1.34 Docket 1 (Notice of Removal) at 1, 5.35 Docket 1-1 at 6–7, ¶¶ 3.1–3.8.36 Docket 9 at 2.37 Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010).38 See Roberts v. Corrothers , 812 F.2d 1173, 1177–78 (9th Cir. 1987) ; Kingman Reef Atoll Invs., L.L.C. v. ......
-
Hampton v. Steen
...Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (1). A challenge to standing is appropriately raised pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1). Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010). "A Rule 12(b)(1) jurisdictional attack may be either facial or factual." Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373......
-
In re Google, Inc. Privacy Policy Litig., Case No. 5:12–cv–01382–PSG
...(2006) (quoting Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 752, 104 S.Ct. 3315, 82 L.Ed.2d 556 (1984) ); see also Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1121–22 (9th Cir.2010).36 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2).37 Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2......
-
Ralph & Lynette Dairy v. Bonham, C-13-1518 EMC
...whether the plaintiff is the proper party to bring the matter to the court for adjudication. See Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010). Because standing pertains to federal court's subject matter jurisdiction, it is properly raised in a Rule 12(b)(1......