The Florida Bar v. McHenry, 76724
| Decision Date | 24 September 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 76724,76724 |
| Citation | 605 So.2d 459 |
| Parties | 17 Fla. L. Week. S598 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. G. Stewart McHENRY, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Susan V. Bloemendaal, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.
Bruce Rogow and Beverly A. Pohl of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for respondent.
Both the Florida Bar and G. Stewart McHenry, a member of the bar, petition this Court to review the referee's report recommending that McHenry be suspended from the practice of law for two years. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 15, Florida Constitution. Given the serious nature of the misconduct in this case, we hereby disbar McHenry from the practice of law in the State of Florida.
The allegations contained in count I of The Florida Bar's complaint relate to McHenry's representation of Miriam Lopez. On October 24, 1988, McHenry met with Lopez in his office regarding her involvement in an automobile accident. He questioned Lopez about the injuries she sustained and she showed him the location of her injuries by placing her hands on her neck and rib cage. Under the guise of conducting a physical examination, McHenry then walked toward Lopez and placed his hands on her neck, arms, rib cage, and back. While touching her, he explained that it was necessary that he, as her attorney, be familiar with the precise nature of her injuries. McHenry then returned to his desk, sat down, and began making motions with his arm and body consistent with the act of masturbation. Lopez then excused herself from the room and immediately left his office.
Count II of the complaint relates to McHenry's conduct while representing Wanda Ferguson. On August 17, 1987, Ferguson consulted McHenry regarding her involvement in an automobile accident and retained him to handle her personal injury claim. During one of her subsequent visits to his office, Ferguson observed that McHenry masturbated while speaking to her. The referee found that Lopez and Ferguson never communicated to one another about their similar experiences with McHenry.
For both counts I and II, the referee recommended that we find McHenry guilty of violating rules 3-4.3 1 and 4-8.4(b) 2 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The referee found that McHenry's office was a place where the public was invited and thus, based on his conduct in the presence of Ferguson, McHenry committed the crime of exposure of sexual organs. 3 As a disciplinary measure, the referee recommended that McHenry be suspended for two years and thereafter until he shall prove mental and ethical rehabilitation.
McHenry asks this Court to disapprove the referee's report and suggests that an appropriate punishment would be no more than a ninety-day suspension. The Florida Bar, on the other hand, argues that McHenry's violations, coupled with his prior disciplinary record, 4 warrant disbarment from the practice of law. We agree.
Although McHenry disputes the referee's factual findings and the weight of the evidence, the referee's findings will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary support. The Florida Bar v. Scott, 566 So.2d 765 (Fla.1990). We conclude that the testimony of Lopez and Ferguson provides competent and substantial evidence to support the referee's findings with respect to McHenry's sexual misconduct. As stated in The Florida Bar v. Samaha, 557 So.2d 1349, 1350 (Fla.1990), "[e]ven the slightest hint of sexual coercion or intimidation directed at a client must be avoided at all costs." McHenry's act of touching Lopez constituted a battery upon his client and his act of masturbation in front of Ferguson also constituted a criminal offense. His conduct in the presence of these two clients reflects adversely on his fitness as a lawyer and on the reputation and dignity of the profession.
We reject McHenry's argument that the instant case falls within the precedent established in Samaha. As part of a sham physical examination, the attorney in Samaha touched his client without her consent and photographed her partially nude. Taking into...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Florida Bar v. Went For It Inc.
...clients to participating Florida lawyers. In October 1992, McHenry was disbarred for reasons unrelated to this suit, The Florida Bar v. McHenry, 605 So.2d 459 (Fla.1992). Another Florida lawyer, John T. Blakely, was substituted in his The District Court referred the parties' competing summa......
-
In re R.M.W
...misconduct" in repeatedly soliciting sex from female clients and making inappropriate comments and touches); Florida Bar v. McHenry, 605 So.2d 459, 461 (Fla. 1992) (holding sexual misconduct in presence of client and past disciplinary record warranted permanent 3. Relevant Caselaw in the Fe......
-
In re Yarborough
...participating in a conversation with a divorce client that was sexual in nature and made the client uncomfortable); The Florida Bar v. McHenry, 605 So.2d 459 (Fla.1992) (attorney was disbarred where he had improperly touched a female client and had masturbated in front of another female cli......
-
McHenry v. The Florida Bar
...that would violate the Rules of Professional Conduct if the communication or contact were made by the lawyer.3 The Florida Bar v. McHenry, 605 So.2d 459 (Fla.1992).4 The Florida Bar: Petition to Amend the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar--Advertising Issues, 571 So.2d 451, 460 (Fla.1990) (P......