State, Dept. of Social Services, Office of Family Support v. Williams
| Citation | 605 So.2d 7 |
| Decision Date | 23 September 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 24,446-CA,24,446-CA |
| Parties | STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, OFFICE OF FAMILY SUPPORT, in the Interest of Jakayla Gabrielle Smith, Minor Child of Wanda Jean Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence WILLIAMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US) |
State of La., Dept. of Social Services by Rudy W. York, for plaintiff-appellant.
Randy E. Collins, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee.
Before HIGHTOWER, VICTORY and STEWART, JJ.
This appeal in a paternity proceeding challenges the denial of appellant's motion for blood tests to determine paternity. For the reasons hereinafter expressed, we reverse.
The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Social Security, Office of Family Support (DOSS), in accordance with authority granted by LSA-R.S. 46:236.1(F) filed a petition to establish filiation on behalf of the minor child, J.S. The DOSS' petition alleges that defendant, Lawrence Williams, Jr. (Williams), is the natural and biological father of J.S. A rule to show cause was also filed for Williams to be ordered to submit to a blood test for the determination of paternity pursuant to LSA-R.S. 9:396, et seq.
Williams filed an answer denying paternity but admitting in his answer to a request for admissions of fact that he engaged in sexual intercourse with Wanda Davis (Davis), the child's mother, on two occasions.
At the hearing on the rule to show cause, Davis stated that she dated Williams in March 1989 and they had sexual intercourse on a regular basis.
DOSS also presented the testimony of Wanda Jackson (Jackson), a friend and former co-worker of Davis, who related that Davis and Williams were involved in a relationship in March 1989 when Davis got pregnant with J.S. Jackson stated that she saw them out on dates and she had dropped Davis off at Williams' work. She also had seen him come to pick Davis up several times from her job. She also stated that, during her close contact with Davis, each work day and on weekends, she never saw Davis' husband.
After hearing the testimony and reviewing the submitted evidence, the trial court ruled that DOSS failed to establish a prima facie case which warranted the issuance of a court order for blood testing to determine paternity. The trial court noted in his reasons for judgment: (1) the presumptive father is listed on the birth certificate; (2) the divorce judgment awarded custody and support of the child to the mother rather than the legal father; (3) Davis had a sexual relationship with Williams and also Charles Battle during the month in which J.S. was conceived. This ensuing appeal presents two assignments of error.
Assignment of error nos. 1 and 2 will be discussed together because the issues presented are intertwined. First, DOSS contends the trial court erred by not ordering the alleged biological father to submit to a blood test to determine paternity.
By the second assignment of error, DOSS contends that the trial court erred when it failed to recognize the concept of "dual paternity" and that a biological father is obligated to provide support for his child notwithstanding the child was conceived or born during the mother's marriage to another person, and thus the legitimate child of that person. We agree with both assignments of error.
The Louisiana Supreme Court, In the Interest of the Minor Child, J.M., 590 So.2d 565 (La.1991) held that in cases in which paternity is contested and a party to the action refuses to voluntarily undergo a blood test, a show cause hearing must be held in which the court can determine whether there is sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case which warrants the issuance of a court order for blood testing. Also, the moving party must show that there is a reasonable possibility of paternity.
The concept of dual paternity was introduced to Louisiana in Warren v. Richard, 296 So.2d 813 (La.1974). Dual paternity allows a child to seek support from his biological father notwithstanding that he was conceived or born during the mother's marriage to another man, and therefore presumed to be the legitimate child of the marriage. LSA-C.C. Art. 184; 1 Griffin v. Succession of Branch, 479 So.2d 324 (La.1985); Malek v. Yekani-Fard, 422 So.2d 1151, 1154 (La.1982). See also, State in Interest of Lawrence v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dupre v. Dupre
...2 Cir. 12/8/99); 747 So.2d 1245, 1247 (citations omitted); See also, State, Dept. of Social Services, Office of Family Support v. Williams, 605 So.2d 7 (La.App. 2 Cir.1992). Further, under La.R.S. 9:344(B), parents of a child's biological parent who is incarcerated may seek reasonable visit......
-
State v. Washington
... ... STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, OFFICE OF FAMILY SUPPORT in the ... Williams, 605 So.2d 7 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1992), and citations ... ...
-
State ex rel. Wilson v. Wilson, 37,674-JAC.
... ... of Louisiana, through the Department of Social Services (the "State"), ordering him to pay child support for Carrie Wilson of whom he is the biological ... State, Dept. of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex ... Williams, 605 So.2d 7 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992) ... ...
-
State v. Rogers
...In theInterest of the Minor Child, J.M., 590 So.2d 565 (La. 1991) ; State, Dep't of Soc. Servs., Office of Family Support v. Williams , 605 So.2d 7 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1992). In the show cause hearing, before an order for blood testing is issued, the moving party must show that there is a reas......