Christian, In re, 79-1542

Decision Date05 October 1979
Docket NumberNo. 79-1542,79-1542
Citation606 F.2d 822
PartiesIn re Earl CHRISTIAN, Petitioner.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Arnold T. Phillips, Jr., Clayton, Mo., for petitioner.

William Kanter and Linda Jan S. Pack, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., App. Staff, Washington, D. C., for respondents.

Before HEANEY, STEPHENSON and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, a Civil Service employee, was fired on July 7, 1978. On July 8, 1978, he commenced an administrative proceeding (hereinafter the administrative appeal) to review that action. The instant petition for a writ of mandamus is to compel a decision in the administrative appeal pending since July 8, 1978.

Because the administrative appeal was pending at the time the 1978 Service Reform Act became effective, January 11, 1979, review of the administrative appeal in the instant case would be in the federal district court rather than this Court. See S.Rep.No. 95-969, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 63, Reprinted in (1978) U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 2723, 2785. Since the petitioner has neither cited authority nor otherwise shown why he first sought relief from this Court, it would be inappropriate for us to grant the writ. Moreover, since the petition was filed, an appropriate government agency has heard and decided the petitioner's case. The issue raised in this proceeding is moot. 1 The writ is denied.

It is so ordered.

1 In addition, part of the petitioner's claim is racial discrimination. Thus, it appears he could bring suit at this time in federal district court for failure of the government agencies to take action on the complaint within 180 days, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c). Since he thereby has an adequate remedy at law, issuance of writ would be inappropriate.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Dugan v. Ramsay
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • March 29, 1983
    ...of Personnel Management, 684 F.2d at 920; Glenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 616 F.2d 270, 271 (6th Cir.1980); In Re Christian, 606 F.2d 822, 822 (8th Cir.1979). CSRA has altered the review format, however, and provides, with certain exceptions not relevant to the instant action,2 tha......
  • Wilder v. Prokop
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • May 10, 1988
    ...Army, 608 F.2d 122, 123 (5th Cir.1979); Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 609 F.2d 540, 542 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1979); In re Christian, 606 F.2d 822, 823 (8th Cir.1979); see also S.Rep. No. 95-969, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 63, reprinted in 1978 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, 2723, 2785 (legislati......
  • B. C. Recreational Industries v. First Nat. Bank of Boston, 80-1383
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • January 30, 1981
  • Phillips v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 79-2276
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 3, 1980
    ...of the Army, 608 F.2d 122 (5th Cir. 1979); Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 609 F.2d 540 (D.C.Cir. 1979); In re Christian, 606 F.2d 822 (8th Cir. 1979); Ellis v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 613 F.2d 49 (3rd Cir. 1980); Alberio v. Office of Appeals Review, Merit Systems Protection......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT