Alston v. Dep't Of Corr.
Decision Date | 08 July 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 09-15137.,09-15137. |
Citation | 610 F.3d 1318 |
Parties | Pressley ALSTON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of FLORIDA, Florida Attorney General's Office, Respondents-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Richard Adam Sichta (Court-Appointed), Frank John Tassone, Jr. (Court-Appointed), Tassone, Sichta & Dreicer, LLC, Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Thomas David Winokur, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Pressley Bernard Alston, a Florida death row inmate, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The state court decided that Alston was competent to waive his state post-conviction proceedings and that his waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The district court found the state court's decision a reasonable application of clearly established federal law and a reasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. After reading the parties' briefs, hearing oral argument, and reviewing the record, we affirm the district court's order denying Alston federal habeas relief.
The facts are taken verbatim from the Florida Supreme Court's decision on direct appeal from Alston's convictions and sentences.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marshall v. Dunn
...proceeding" – fall outside the ambit of this court's authority to provide relief under § 2254. See Alston v. Department of Corrections , 610 F.3d 1318, 1326 (11th Cir. 2010) (citations omitted).A. A habeas petitioner "can seek federal habeas relief only on claims that have been exhausted in......
-
Esty v. Jones
...represent attacks on proceedings collateral to petitioner's confinement and not the confinement itself. See Alston v. Dep't of Corr., Fla., 610 F.3d 1318, 1326 (11th Cir. 2010) (holding that habeas petitioner's challenge to his state postconviction proceeding (the state court's ruling that ......
-
Saunders v. Stewart
...the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.'" Alston v. Dep't of Corr., Fla., 610 F.3d 1318, 1325 (11th Cir. 2010) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a)). Because this claim attacks the Rule 32 proceedings, which is a post-conviction re......
-
McDavid v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...does not state a basis for habeas relief." Quince v. Crosby, 360 F.3d 1259, 1262 (11th Cir. 2004); see also Alston v. Dep't of Corrs., Fla., 610 F.3d 1318, 1325 (11th Cir. 2010); Carroll v. Sec'y, DOC, 574 F.3d 1354, 1365 (11th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases). There is a valid reason behind t......
-
Review Proceedings
...relief because petitioner did not present clear and convincing evidence to rebut determination); Alston v. Dep’t of Corr., Fla., 610 F.3d 1318, 1326-28 (11th P ROCEEDINGS V. R EVIEW 1130 51 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. (2022) culpability, 2900 and validity of peremptory challenges. 2901 ......