611 F.3d 397 (7th Cir. 2010), 09-3060, United States v. Paige
|Citation:||611 F.3d 397|
|Opinion Judge:||EVANS, Circuit Judge.|
|Party Name:||UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emmett PAIGE, Defendant-Appellant.|
|Attorney:||Michael T. Sterling (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Anthony L. Schumann (argued), Grant Schumann, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.|
|Judge Panel:||Before MANION, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||July 06, 2010|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit|
Argued June 3, 2010.
Emmett Paige appeals arguing that his 96-month sentence is too long. He says the district judge failed to adequately address his arguments for a shorter term. It's an odd argument, considering that the PSI, accurately it would appear, pegged Paige's guideline range at 151-188 months. Instead of that range, the judge acceded to the parties' request and used a range of 87-108 months, one that was negotiated by the parties in Paige's plea agreement.
The facts are simple. Over a sixteen-day period in June of 2007, Paige robbed four banks, each in a different small community just outside of Chicago. He hit one in Burbank, followed that up eleven days later with one in Westmont, and then hit two, one in Countryside and one in Addison, over the next five days. All four robberies went down the same way-Paige entered a bank and gave a demand note to a teller that said something like, " This is a stick up, give me all the money or I'll shoot." In each robbery, he received cash and fled. His scores were $8,741, $5,755, $4,924, and $2,520 for a grand total of $21,960. His spree came to a halt after his getaway car (driven by a co-defendant, James Jennings) went into a ditch while being pursued by Addison police officers after the fourth bank was hit.
On appeal, Paige argues that the sentencing judge erred by failing to adequately address his difficult family background, the steps he took to further his education and vocational skills while incarcerated, his history of mental and emotional health problems, and his addiction to gambling and illegal drugs. While the judge did not directly state how each of these items factored into the sentence, he did not ignore them. He talked about Paige's difficult family background. He recommended that Paige serve his time in a prison where he could train to become a chef. He also recommended that Paige participate in a...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP