Awkal v. Mitchell
Decision Date | 23 July 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 01-4278.,01-4278. |
Citation | 613 F.3d 629 |
Parties | Abdul AWKAL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
ARGUED: R. Brian Moriarty, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Benjamin C. Mizer, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Kevin M. Cafferkey, Thomas F. O'Malley, Jr., Law Offices, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Benjamin C. Mizer, David M. Lieberman, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.
Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; MARTIN, BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, and WHITE, Circuit Judges. *
MARTIN, J. (pp. 649-658), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which MOORE, COLE, and CLAY, JJ., joined.
OPINION
Abdul Awkal was convicted by an Ohio jury on two counts of aggravated murder for the shooting deaths of his wife and brother-in-law in 1992. The jury recommended a sentence of death, and the trial court sentenced Awkal accordingly. Awkal now appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
In his petition, Awkal argues that (1) his counsel was ineffective at the guilt phase of his trial for calling a psychiatrist who directly contradicted the defense's theory of not guilty by reason of insanity, (2) his counsel was ineffective at the penalty phase for failing to introduce records of his previous involuntary hospitalization and for failing to present testimony of competent mental health experts, and (3) the prosecutor's statement in closing argument about Awkal's being able to “walk out the door” if found not guilty by reason of insanity was prosecutorial misconduct. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court in denying Awkal's petition for habeas relief.
In affirming both Awkal's murder conviction and death sentence on direct appeal, the Supreme Court of Ohio provided a thorough description of the relevant facts and subsequent trial:
shamed and that her baby had been made illegitimate by the divorce.
then himself. Awkal vowed that nobody was going to take his baby.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thomas v. Ed Sheldon
...and independent state ground barring federal habeas review." See Biros v. Bagley, 422 F.3d 379, 387 (6th Cir. 2005); Awkal v. Mitchell, 613 F.3d 629, 648-649 (6th Cir. 2010) (citing Lundgren, 440 F.3d at 765); Hinkle v. Randle, 271 F.3d 239, 244 (6th Cir. 2001). In his Traverse, Thomas did ......
-
White v. Warden
...F.3d 307, 334-35 (6th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied sub nom. Wogenstahl v. Robinson, 568 U.S. 902 (2012); Awkal v. Mitchell, 613 F.3d 629, 648-49 (6th Cir. 2010) cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1183 (2011). The state appellate court's plain error review does not constitute a waiver of the s......
-
Parker v. Burt
...in state court. SeeWainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 86-88 (1977); Taylor v. McKee, 649 F.3d 446, 450 (6th Cir. 2011); Awkal v. Mitchell, 613 F.3d 629, 648 (6th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, review by this court is barred unless Petitioner can show cause and prejudice or actual innocence. House,......
-
Wilson v. Warden, Pickaway Corr. Inst.
...with the procedural default.'" Plott v. Turner, No. 3:18-cv-2372, 2018 WL 3271629, at *10 (N.D. Ohio May 29, 2020) (citing Awkal v. Mitchell, 613 F.3d 629, 648 649 (6th Cir. 2010)). A state court's plain error review does not constitute a waiver of the procedural default. See Mason v. Bruns......
-
The Voice of Reason-why Recent Judicial Interpretations of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's Restrictions on Habeas Corpus Are Wrong
...lengthy journey to define 'unreasonable' is a circular one, and we are left at the point at which we started"). 68. See Awkai v. Mitchell, 613 F.3d 629, 638 (6th Cir. 2010) 69. See Collins v. Gaetz, 612 F.3d 574, 585 (7th Cir. 2010). In an earlier decision, a Seventh Circuit panel described......