Alamo Nat. Bank v. Kraus
| Decision Date | 22 April 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. B-8901,B-8901 |
| Citation | 616 S.W.2d 908 |
| Parties | The ALAMO NATIONAL BANK et al., Petitioners, v. John W. KRAUS, Jr. et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Matthews, Nowlin, Macfarlene & Barrett, F. W. Baker, R. H. Mercer, Groce, Locke & Hebdon, Jack Hebdon and Thomas H. Crofts, Jr., San Antonio, Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, Robert Hearon, Austin, for petitioners.
Fred A. Semann, Sam C. Bashara, San Antonio, for respondents.
This is a personal injury and wrongful death case. A jury found that Defendants Alamo National Bank and Kelly Salvage Company acted with negligence and gross negligence which proximately caused the death of Nancy Marie Kraus and the injury of her son, John L. Kraus. The trial court disregarded a jury finding and denied recovery against the Bank. Judgment was rendered against Kelly Salvage Company for actual and exemplary damages. The Court of Civil Appeals reformed the trial court's judgment and decreed that plaintiffs recover actual and exemplary damages from Alamo National Bank and affirmed the judgment against Kelly Salvage Company. 586 S.W.2d 202. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals.
Alamo National Bank owned the Old Household Furniture Store building. The building was a three-story masonry structure located across St. Mary's Street from the Bank in downtown San Antonio. The west wall of the building faced St. Mary's Street and the Bank.
In April 1976, the Bank contracted with Kelly Salvage Company to demolish the building. Demolition began on April 23 under a demolition permit issued by the City. Rather than demolish the building one story at a time, Kelly Salvage demolished the building in vertical sections beginning with the east wall. Two interior limestone walls, which ran parallel to the east and west walls, divided the building into thirds. First, the roof on the east one-third was removed and that section was demolished. Second, the roof on the middle one-third was removed and that section was demolished. The last section to be demolished was the west one-third which faced St. Mary's Street.
About 5 p. m. on September 14, the west wall of the building fell across St. Mary's Street and on a car driven by Nancy Marie Kraus. Mrs. Kraus was killed and her minor son, John L. Kraus, was injured. The wall was supported by five three-quarter inch steel cables. However, the steel support to the wall had been removed, the load support members had been cut, and the wall was not laterally braced.
John W. Kraus, Jr., individually and as next friend of his minor son, John L. Kraus, and Fred and Letty Petty, the surviving heirs of Nancy Marie Kraus, sued Alamo National Bank and Kelly Salvage, for the death of Mrs. Kraus and personal injuries to her son, John L. Kraus. A jury found: (1) Kelly Salvage was negligent and acted with gross negligence in its demolition of the Old Household Furniture Store building and such negligence and gross negligence proximately caused the occurrence in question; (2) the demolition of the Old Household Furniture Store building was inherently dangerous work and Alamo National Bank knew, contemplated, had reason to know, or had reason to contemplate that the demolition of the building was inherently dangerous work when it hired Kelly Salvage Company; and (3) Alamo National Bank was negligent and acted with gross negligence in connection with the demolition of the Old Household Furniture Store building and such negligence and gross negligence proximately caused the occurrence in question.
The jury awarded the following damages:
(1) $20,000 actual damages to John W. Kraus, Jr.;
(2) $226,000 actual damages to John L. Kraus;
(3) $5,000 actual damages to Fred Petty;
(4) $5,000 actual damages to Letty Petty;
(5) $500,000 exemplary damages to John W. Kraus, Jr. against Alamo National Bank;
(6) $500,000 exemplary damages to John L. Kraus against Alamo National Bank;
(7) $500,000 exemplary damages to John W. Kraus, Jr. against Kelly Salvage; and
(8) $500,000 exemplary damages to John L. Kraus against Kelly Salvage.
The trial court disregarded the jury's finding of inherently dangerous work and rendered judgment that plaintiffs take nothing against Alamo National Bank. The trial court rendered judgment on the verdict against Kelly Salvage. 1
The Court of Civil Appeals reformed and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. It rendered judgment that John W. Kraus, Jr. recover the following damages: $25,803.46 in actual damages against Alamo National Bank and Kelly Salvage; $500,000 in exemplary damages against Alamo National Bank; and $500,000 in exemplary damages against Kelly Salvage. 2 Alamo National Bank argues that the award of exemplary damages to John W. Kraus, Jr. is excessive and disproportionate to the actual damages awarded.
Exemplary damages must be reasonably proportioned to actual damages. Southwestern Investment Company v. Neeley, 452 S.W.2d 705 (Tex. 1970); Fort Worth Elevators Company v. Russell, 123 Tex. 128, 70 S.W.2d 397 (1934). See also Comment, The Reasonable Ratio Between Exemplary And Actual Damages In Texas, 10 Hous.L.Rev. 131 (1972); Comment, Required Ratio of Actual To Exemplary Damages, 25 Baylor L.Rev. 127 (1973). There can be no set rule or ratio between the amount of actual and exemplary damages which will be considered reasonable. This determination must depend upon the facts of each particular case. First Security Bank & Trust Company v. Roach, 493 S.W.2d 612 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1973, writ ref'd n. r. e.); Cain v. Fontana, 423 S.W.2d 134 (Tex.Civ.App. San Antonio 1967, writ ref'd n. r. e.). Factors to consider in determining whether an award of exemplary damages is reasonable include (1) the nature of the wrong, (2) the character of the conduct involved, (3) the degree of culpability of the wrongdoer, (4) the situation and sensibilities of the parties concerned, and (5) the extent to which such conduct offends a public sense of justice and propriety. First Security Bank & Trust Company v. Roach, supra; Cain v. Fontana, supra.
Whether the amount of damages awarded by the jury is excessive is a question of fact over which this Court has no jurisdiction. Southwestern Investment Company v. Neeley, supra; Flanigan v. Carswell, 159 Tex. 598, 324 S.W.2d 835 (1959). Whether the Court of Civil Appeals applied an erroneous standard in determining the excessiveness of damages presents a question of law within the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
HNMC, Inc. v. Chan
...giving rise to a duty when it demolished a building on its property, causing a wall to fall onto a city street, Alamo Nat'l Bank v. Kraus , 616 S.W.2d 908, 910-11 (Tex. 1981) ; when smoke from a grass fire drifted across an adjacent road, Atchison v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co. , 143 Tex. 466, 186 ......
-
Nabours v. Longview Sav. & Loan Ass'n
...result necessarily follows from the rule that punitive damages must bear a reasonable proportion to actual damages. Alamo National Bank v. Kraus, 616 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.1981); Southwestern Investment Co. v. Neeley, 452 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.1970). International Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. Holloway, 368......
-
Texas Farmers Ins. Co. v. Soriano
...what has occurred and to deter its repetition. Haslip, 499 U.S. at ----, ---- - ----, 111 S.Ct. at 1042-43, 1045. In Alamo Nat'l Bank v. Kraus, 616 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.1981), the Texas Supreme Court directed that appellate review proceed along these Exemplary damages must be reasonably proporti......
-
IN RE AIR CRASH DISASTER AT STAPLETON INTERN.
...during Phase II. Compare Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code §§ 41.001, 41.003 (Supp.1989) (elements of liability) with Alamo National Bank v. Kraus, 616 S.W.2d 908, 910 (Tex. 1981) (elements of amount). Plaintiffs do not contend that the implementation of the trial plan precluded any evidence going t......
-
Texas Commission on Human Rights Act: Procedures and Remedies
...concerned; and (v) the extent to which such conduct offends a public sense of justice and propriety. See Alamo Nat’l Bank v. Kraus, 616 S.W.2d 908, 910 (Tex. 1981) (Kraus Factors); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §41.011 (West 2015) (statutory adoption of Kraus Factors for consideration by......
-
Texas commission on human rights act: procedures and remedies
...concerned; and (v) the extent to which such conduct offends a public sense of justice and propriety. See Alamo Nat’l Bank v. Kraus , 616 S.W.2d 908, 910 (Tex. 1981) ( Kraus factors); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §41.011 (West 2015) (statutory adoption of Kraus factors for consideration ......
-
Other Workplace Torts
...and (v) the extent to which the defendant’s conduct offends the public’s sense of justice and propriety. Alamo Nat’l Bank v. Kraus , 616 S.W.2d 908, 910 (Tex. 1981); Borden, Inc. v. Guerra , 860 S.W.2d 515 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1993, writ dism’d by agrmt.). The courts also consider whet......
-
Discrimination Claims Under Labor Code Chapter 451
...the Texas Supreme Court’s requirement that these damages “be reasonably proportioned to actual damages.” Alamo National Bank v. Kraus , 616 S.W.2d 908, 910 (Tex. 1981). Courts have translated the “reasonably proportioned” language into an examination of the “ratio” of exemplary damages to a......