People v. Romero, S055856.
| Citation | 354 P.3d 983,191 Cal.Rptr.3d 855,62 Cal.4th 1 |
| Decision Date | 27 August 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. S055856.,S055856. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (California) |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Orlando Gene ROMERO and Christopher Self, Defendants and Appellants. |
62 Cal.4th 1
354 P.3d 983
191 Cal.Rptr.3d 855
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent
v.
Orlando Gene ROMERO and Christopher Self, Defendants and Appellants.
No. S055856.
Supreme Court of California
Aug. 27, 2015.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Oct. 14, 2015.
Michael P. Goldstein, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant Orlando Gene Romero.
William D. Farber, San Rafael, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant Christopher Self.
Edmund G. Brown., Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Holly D. Wilkens, Ivy B. Fitzpatrick and Theodore M. Cropley, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Defendants Orlando Gene Romero and Christopher Self were convicted of the first degree murders of Joey Mans, Timothy Jones, and Jose Aragon, the willful, deliberate, and premeditated attempted murders of Kenneth Mills, Paulita Williams, and Randolph Rankins, the attempted robbery of Kenneth Mills and Vicky Ewy, shooting at the vehicle occupied by
Kenneth Mills and Ewy, the mayhem of Kenneth Mills, the second degree robberies of William Meredith, Jerry Mills, Sr., Jerry Mills, Jr., and Albert Knoefler, the second degree burglary and vandalism of Magnolia Center Interiors, and receiving stolen property. (Pen.Code1 §§ 187, subd. (a), 189, 205, 211, 459, 496, 594, subd. (b)(2), 664.) The juries2 also found true robbery-murder special-circumstance allegations as to all three murders, two multiple-murder special-circumstance allegations for each murder, and arming enhancement allegations. (§§ 190.2, subd. (a)(3), (17)(i), 12022, subd. (a)(1).) Self was also convicted of the willful, deliberate, and premeditated attempted murder and second degree robbery of John Feltenberger
and the kidnapping for robbery and second degree robbery of Alfred Steenblock, and the jury found true great bodily injury enhancement allegations as to the crimes against Feltenberger and Kenneth Mills and arming enhancement allegations. (§§ 187, subd. (a), 209, subd. (b), 211, 664, 12022, subd. (a)(1), 12022.7.) Romero was also convicted of the kidnapping for robbery and second degree robbery of Robert Greer, the second degree robbery of Roger Beliveau, and receiving stolen property (Feltenberger's ammunition pouch), and the jury found true arming enhancement allegations. (§§ 209, subd. (b), 211, 496, 12022, subd. (a)(1).) The juries returned death verdicts, and the trial court entered judgments of death. This appeal is automatic. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11, subd. (a); § 1239, subd. (b).) For the reasons that follow we reverse Self's conviction and sentence for Knoefler's robbery, vacate five multiple-murder special-circumstance findings for each defendant, and otherwise affirm the judgments.
I. Facts
A. Guilt Phase
1. Prosecution case
In 1992, defendants and brothers Romero and Self3 engaged in a two-month crime spree. They were joined at times by Jose Munoz, who pled guilty and testified against defendants at trial,4 and Daniel Chavez, whose case was severed before trial. Defendants were also implicated by their
recorded statements to police, which were played for the jury, and by witness identification and physical evidence.
a. Meredith robbery
On October 8, 1992, about 10:30 p.m., defendants and Munoz robbed William Meredith and stole his 1991 Nissan Pathfinder. They subsequently made a withdrawal and a charge on Meredith's Visa card.
b. Mans and Jones murders
In the early hours of October 12, 1992, defendants, Munoz, and Chavez noticed Timothy Jones and his best friend Joey Mans in a car at a hilltop area near Lake Mathews. Romero and Munoz ordered the men out of the car at gunpoint. Romero told Mans to
relax and everything would be all right, and had Mans lie down on the ground next to Jones. Romero told Chavez to “[s]hoot,” adding, “[s]omething like this.” Romero shot Mans in the back, killing him. He attempted to shoot Jones, but the gun malfunctioned. Jones got up and ran down the hill, and defendants ran after him. Self beat Jones with his fists and a pipe and shot him four times, killing him. Defendants stole the victims' car keys and a box containing boots, shoes, magazines, and toiletries.
c. Kenneth Mills and Ewy assault
On October 22, 1992, between 11:30 p.m. and midnight, Kenneth Mills and his girlfriend Vicky Ewy took a drive to look at the lightning. Defendants and Munoz pulled up beside them and Self shot Mills, who was driving, in the face. Defendants continued to chase them until Mills turned
onto a golf cart path. Mills permanently lost vision in his right eye.
d. Williams and Rankins attempted murders
In the early morning hours of October 26, 1992, Randolph Rankins was unsuccessful in purchasing methamphetamine for defendants and Munoz. Romero said he would “be seeing” Rankins later; defendants and Munoz then left. Romero told Self and Munoz that if Rankins did not refund their money, they should “take him out,” and Self agreed. About an hour later, Rankins was with acquaintance Paulita Williams in her car at the intersection of Alexander Street and Myron Street in Riverside County. Williams was trying to back up to make a turn she had missed. Defendants' car appeared and blocked Williams's car, and Munoz and Self got out. As Munoz began shooting, Rankins escaped from the car. The bullets struck Williams in her left side and shattered the driver and passenger windows. Self, who appeared
to be smiling, began stabbing Williams in the arm. Munoz pushed Self away and shot Williams. Williams suffered a punctured lung and three cuts on her hand and arm, including a nine-inch-long gash on her arm that required about 80 stitches. One of the bullets left a deep gash on her back about six inches long and an inch and a half wide, and pellets were embedded in her spine, shoulder bone, and muscle. Williams still felt the pellets constantly and could not bear weight on her shoulders.
e. Magnolia Center Interiors burglary and vandalism
On the night of November 13, 1992, defendants broke into Magnolia Center Interiors in Riverside. File drawers were emptied, fire extinguishers were sprayed on fabric samples, and glue was sprayed into computers, telephones, fax machines, and calculators. Words similar to “You're going to die” were written on a sonogram picture of the shop owner's unborn son and the picture was stabbed with a sharp object. The words “Just when you thought” and the number “666” were written on the wall and the words “Now you die” were written in the bathroom. The store safe was closed but its combination lock was missing and its hinges had been tampered with. A pair of bolt cutters was found by the safe and several screwdrivers and chisels had been “beaten flat,” as though “somebody was pounding” on the hinges “trying to pull the hinge pins out.” A set of unlabeled master keys to offices around the city and a set of keys to the shop van were taken, along with personal objects.
f. Steenblock kidnapping and robbery
On November 18, 1992, about 1:15 p.m., Alfred Steenblock was eating lunch in his 1992 Pontiac Grand Prix parked at the Mission Grove Plaza shopping center in Riverside. Self approached Steenblock, pointed a gun at his face, and told him to move over. Self drove Steenblock to an empty field. Another car followed and parked behind them, and two men, including Chavez, got out. Self demanded Steenblock's wallet, took out his automated teller machine (ATM) card, and asked for his personal identification number (PIN). He also took about $80 in cash and Steenblock's watch. The men instructed Steenblock to get out of the car, walk into the field, and stay there for an hour, and then left, taking Steenblock's car. Steenblock's partially stripped car was later recovered in a rural area of Mead Valley.
g. Knoefler robbery
On November 20, 1992, about 3:30 p.m., Albert Knoefler was tending beehives at Markham Street and Washington Street in
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Romero, S055856.
...62 Cal.4th 1354 P.3d 983191 Cal.Rptr.3d 855The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondentv.Orlando Gene ROMERO and Christopher Self, Defendants and Appellants.No. S055856.Supreme Court of CaliforniaAug. 27, 2015.As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Oct. 14, 2015.191 Cal.Rptr.3d 864Michael P. Goldstein,......
-
People v. Gomez
...Attorney General argues that the deputies' ancestry was relevant to Gomez's future dangerousness. (See People v. Romero and Self (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1, 53, 191 Cal.Rptr.3d 855, 354 P.3d 983 [holding that a prosecutor may argue "that a defendant will be dangerous in the future based on evidenc......
-
The People v. Moody
...as a matter of law to support a conviction, due to the reliability questions posed by accomplice testimony. (People v. Romero and Self (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1, 32.) When an accomplice testifies as a witness for the People, evidence is seen as coming from a source tainted by the accomplice's par......
-
Table of Cases null
...§3.2.4 People v. Romero, 149 Cal. App. 4th 29, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 678 (4th Dist. 2007)—Ch. 3-B, §2.2.2(1)(c)[2] People v. Romero and Self, 62 Cal. 4th 1, 191 Cal. Rptr. 3d 855, 354 P.3d 983 (2015)—Ch. 1, §4.8.4(1)(a); §4.13; Ch. 2, §11.1.1(2)(g); Ch. 3-B, §17.2.2; Ch. 5-E, §3.2.1(3) (d); Ch. ......
-
Chapter 1 - §4. Relevance of specific evidence
...not attempted. People v. Williams (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1127, 1145; see People v. Henriquez (2017) 4 Cal.5th 1, 29-30; People v. Romero (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1, 38; People v. Box (2000) 23 Cal.4th 1153, 1205, disapproved on other grounds, People v. Martinez (2010) 47 Cal.4th 911. (b) Returning home ......
-
Chapter 5 - §3. Right of confrontation & out-of-court statements
...60 Cal.4th 153, 249 (statement made by potential witness who was also D's wife), disapproved on other grounds, People v. Romero (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1. Although the U.S. Supreme Court originally held in Crawford that all statements made as a result of law-enforcement interrogation would necess......
-
Chapter 4 - §1. Overview
...896-97; Salazar, 35 Cal.4th at 1042; see People v. Whalen (2013) 56 Cal.4th 1, 64, disapproved on other grounds, People v. Romero (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1; see, e.g., Bracamontes, 42 Cal.App.5th at 119 (private forensic laboratories that provided DNA testing services to prosecutors and law-enfor......