Korsmeyer Plumbing & Heating Company v. McClay

Decision Date05 February 1895
Docket Number6349
Citation62 N.W. 50,43 Neb. 649
PartiesKORSMEYER PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY v. J. H. MCCLAY ET AL
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

ERROR from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before STRODE, J.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Leese & Starling, for plaintiff in error.

Atkinson & Doty, Chas. O. Whedon, and Pound & Burr, contra.

OPINION

POST J.

This was an action by the plaintiff in error in the district court for Lancaster county, against W. H. B. Stout as principal, and J. H. McClay, Louis Meyer, and J. H Harley, as sureties, on a bond of the former to said county. Said bond is conditioned for the faithful performance by the principal of the provisions of a contract for the erection of a court house for the obligee thereof. A demurrer of the sureties to the petition was sustained by the district court, and the plaintiff refusing to plead further, the action was dismissed as to them, whereupon it was removed into this court for review upon allegations of error. The subject of the controversy is certain building material furnished by the plaintiff's assignors, F. A. Korsmeyer & Co., for use in the construction of said court house. The only question necessary to consider is whether there exists between the sureties in this case and the plaintiff's assignors such privity as would entitle the latter to recover against them on the bond.

It was stipulated in the contract that Stout should receive eighty-five per cent of the amount earned thereunder, payable on monthly estimates of the superintendent of construction also, "that in each case of payment a certificate shall be obtained by the contractor from the clerk of the county, signed and sealed by said clerk, that he has carefully examined the records, and finds no liens or claims recorded against said work, or on account of said contractor. Neither shall there be any legal or lawful claims against the contractor in any manner from any source whatever for work or material furnished on said work." In Lyman v. City of Lincoln, 38 Neb. 794, 57 N.W. 531, the undertaking of the sureties was that "the contractors shall file with the board of public works receipts of claims from all parties furnishing materials and labor in the construction of said engine houses," and which was construed as a promise on the part of the obligors that the principal would satisfy the claims of laborers and material-men. In Sample v. Hale, 34 Neb. 220, 51 N.W....

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT