Kimble v. D. J. McDuffy, Inc.

Decision Date17 October 1980
Docket NumberNo. 78-1474,78-1474
PartiesVersie KIMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. J. McDUFFY, INC. and Industrial Foundation Of the South, and all of its subscribers, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Alvin B. Rubin, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation.

Lawrence D. Wiedemann, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, Harry S. Redmon, Jr., Rutledge C. Clement, Jr., Margaret Ann Brown, New Orleans, La., George J. Petrovich, Jr., Ft. Worth, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

(Opinion, 5 Cir., 1980, 623 F.2d 1060).

Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Oaks v. City of Fairhope, Ala.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama
    • 20 mai 1981
    ...filed a previous federal lawsuit. See Kimble v. D. J. McDuffy, Inc., 623 F.2d 1060 (5th Cir. 1980), rehearing en banc granted, 629 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir. 1980) (42 U.S.C. § 1985); Smalley v. Eatonville, City of, 640 F.2d 765, 769 (5th Cir. 1981) (Title VII); Employment Discrimination Law at 30......
  • Kimble v. D. J. McDuffy, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 18 juin 1981
    ...a panel of this court, with one judge dissenting, reversed. 623 F.2d 1060 (1980). The court then voted to rehear the case en banc, 629 F.2d 1159 (1980), thus vacating the panel opinion. See Fifth Circuit Local Rule 17. We now hold that Kimble's allegations do not come within the scope of Se......
  • Courtney v. Reeves
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 9 janvier 1981
    ...pending before this court en banc. See Kimble v. D. J. McDuffy, Inc., 623 F.2d 1060 (5th Cir.), vacated for rehearing en banc, 629 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir. 1980) (slip op. 814, Oct. 17, 1980). Under prior law in this circuit, Courtney could not recover under a § 1985(b) conspiracy theory because......
  • Murphy v. Villanova University
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 20 août 1981
    ...of a conspiracy because of their political beliefs or associations." Kimble v. D. J. McDuffy, Inc., 623 F.2d 1060, 1066, vacated, 629 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir. 1980), en banc opinion, 648 F.2d 340 (1981).1 But, assuming the correctness of the decisions referred to in the panel's decision in Kimbl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT