Lee v. Porter
Citation | 63 Ga. 345 |
Parties | LEE. v. Porter, surviving partner. |
Decision Date | 30 September 1879 |
Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
[Warner, Chief Justice, being engaged in presiding over the senate, organized as a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]
Bill of exceptions. Evidence. Practice in the Supreme Court. September Term, 1879.
Reported in the decision.
EmmETT Womack, for plaintiff in error.
Clarke & Pace; H. K. McCay, for defendant.
In the court below, this was a rule for the distribution ofmoney. The parties to the present writ of error were competing creditors, each claiming a judgment lien upon the *fund. The issue as to both law and fact was, by consent, tried by the court without a jury, and the judgment is excepted to generally, with no specification as to whether the error intended to be alleged was a mistaken finding upon the facts, or an erroneous ruling on some point of law. A material part of the evidence was documentary, such as exemplifications from the records of other courts, and no copy of the documents is brought up, nor does any recital of their contents appear. The bill of exceptions merely represents that this and that writing showed so and so, stating the supposed legal effect, but not in a way to enable this court to determine for itself what conclusions ought to have been drawn from them. At the call of the case here, the defendant in error moved to dismiss the writ of error for this deficiency in the record. The assignment of error being general, we cannot review the judgment without going into the facts, just as the court below did. For this purpose we ought to have the evidence, and not merely the inferences which the counsel for the plaintiff in error, with the judge\'s sanction, drew from it in preparing the bill of exceptions. It may be that we would draw very different inferences, and these differences might go to uphold the judgment; for many steps in the reasoning of the court below might be defective, and still its ultimate conclusion be correct. It not infrequently happens that a judgment is affirmed upon a theory of the case which did not occur to the court that rendered it, or which did occur and was expressly repudiated. The human mind is so constituted that in many instances it finds the truth when wholly unable to find the way that leads to it.
"The pupil of impulse, it forc'd him along, His conduct still right, with his argument wrong; Still aiming at honor, yet fearing to roam, The coachman was tipsy,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pavilion Development v. Jbj Partnership
...v. Freightliner, LLC, 196 Or. App. 83, 100 P.3d 1117 (2004). The use of that moniker stems from a 19th century Georgia case, Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345, 346 (1879), in which the Georgia Supreme Court "It not infrequently happens that a judgment is affirmed upon a theory of the case which did......
-
Hawkins v. Commonwealth
...Inc., No. 1876–12–3, 2013 WL 3126616, at *3 n. 3, 2013 Va.App. LEXIS 187, at *8 n. 3 (Va.Ct.App. June 18, 2013) (quoting Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345, 346 (1879) ...
-
Robertson v. State
...rule" as follows: There is a rule used by courts of appeal which is called the "tipsy coachman" rule. It comes to us from Georgia, Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345, by the way of our supreme court in Carraway v. Armour & Co., 156 So.2d 494 (Fla.1963). The pupil of impulse, it fore'd [sic] him alon......
-
Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA
...court stated: There is a rule used by courts of appeal which is called the "tipsy coachman" rule. It comes to us from Georgia, Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345, by the way of our supreme court in Carraway v. Armour & Co., 156 So.2d 494 The pupil of impulse, it fore'd [sic] him along, His conduct s......
-
Tipping the ole tipsy coachman over in his grave: an inequity of appellate review.
...reached out to Oliver Goldsmith's poem, Retaliation: A Poem, (8) to conclude the Georgia Supreme Court's decision in Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345 (Ga. 1879). While we may never know what prompted Justice Bleckley, we do know that the appellant failed to provide a sufficient record on appeal to......
-
Tales of the tipsy coachman: being right for the wrong reason: the tipsy coachman is alive and well and living in Florida.
...Doctrine The first legal reference to the tipsy coachman appeared in the 1879 opinion of the Georgia Supreme Court in Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345 (1879), which states the rationale underlying the It may be that we would draw very different inferences [than those drawn by the trial judge], and......