State v. Cummings
Decision Date | 24 February 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 23905.,23905. |
Citation | 101 Haw. 139,63 P.3d 1109 |
Parties | STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Neal CUMMINGS, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Hawaii Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
54 cases
-
State v. Jess
...sentences were not alleged in their charging instrument, their extended sentences are therefore invalid. See State v. Cummings, 101 Hawai`i 139, 143, 63 P.3d 1109, 1113 (2003) (holding that, aside from technical errors, the omission of an essential element in the charging instrument is a de......
-
State v. Tominiko
...subject matter jurisdiction over the case. Tominiko, dissenting op. at 1 (Fujise, J., dissenting) (citing State v. Cummings, 101 Hawai‘i 139, 145, 63 P.3d 1109, 1115 (2003) ).Tominiko subsequently applied for a writ of certiorari to the ICA's July 15, 2010 Judgment on Appeal filed pursuant ......
-
Bank of Hawaii v. Shinn
...of an offense, the court is deprived of subject matter jurisdiction and the omission is prejudicial per se. State v. Cummings, 101 Hawai`i 139, 142-43, 63 P.3d 1109, 1112-13 (2003). By contrast, if the charging instrument simply omits a word rather than an essential element, a defendant who......
-
State v. Sakamoto
...State v. Ortiz, 74 Haw. 343, 351-52, 845 P.2d 547, 551-52 (1993) (citations omitted); see also State v. Cummings, 101 Hawai'i 139, 144-45 n. 4, 63 P.3d 1109, 1114-15 n. 4 (2003); Coon v. City and County of Honolulu, 98 Hawai'i 233, 259, 47 P.3d 348, 374 (2002). The dissent's position render......
Request a trial to view additional results