Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority

Decision Date11 December 1984
Parties, 474 N.E.2d 612 Evelina LEWIS, Appellant, v. The METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Bentley Kassal at the Appellate Division (99 A.D.2d 246, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368).

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
134 cases
  • In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 23 Julio 1993
    ... ... ; Babcock & Wilcox Company; Bell/Atlas Asbestos Corp.; Port Authority of New York and New Jersey; Nassau County Medical Center, a/d/a ... , 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 647, 492 N.E.2d 774, 775 (1986); Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 251, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, 72 ... ...
  • Cruz v. New York City Transit Authority
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Marzo 1988
    ...Manhattan R. Co., 112 N.Y. 443, 20 N.E. 383; Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, affd. 64 N.Y.2d 670, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252, 474 N.E.2d 612; Boettcher v. Dowling, 243 App.Div. 397, 277 N.Y.S.2d 228, affd. 270 N.Y. 557, 200 N.E. 316; 17 NY Jur 2d, Carriers, §§ 41......
  • Walsh v. Super Value, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Junio 2010
    ...about it ( see Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 249, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, affd. for reasons stated below 64 N.Y.2d 670, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252, 474 N.E.2d 612). But not always. It is possible, even for a reasonable person acting reasonably, to create a dangerous or defective condi......
  • Barnett v. City of Yonkers
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 8 Febrero 1990
    ...also Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 99 A.D.2d 246, 251, 472 N.Y. S.2d 368, 372 (1st Dep't), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 670, 474 N.E.2d 612, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252 (1984) ("condition must have existed for a sufficient period to afford landowner, in the exercise of reasonable care, an opport......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Overruling by implication and the consequent burden upon bench and bar.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 75 No. 2, December 2011
    • 22 Diciembre 2011
    ...848 N.Y.S.2d at 563. (18) Lewis v. Metro. Transport. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 249, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, 371 (App. Div. 1st Dep't 1984), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 670, 474 N.E.2d 612 (19) Pratt, Hurst & Co. v. Tailer, 186 N.Y. 417, 421, 79 N.E. 328, 329 (1906) ("[I]t is perfectly plain that the landlor......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT