People v. Claudio
| Decision Date | 14 February 1985 |
| Citation | 487 N.Y.S.2d 318,476 N.E.2d 644,64 N.Y.2d 858 |
| Parties | , 476 N.E.2d 644 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pedro CLAUDIO, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 103 A.D.2d 1047, 479 N.Y.S.2d 390, should be affirmed.
Defendant's contention that his warrantless arrest in a public place was invalid because felony complaints charging him with the crimes for which he was arrested had already been filed has not been preserved for review by any argument or objection made in a written motion or at the suppression hearing. The additional claim with respect to County Court's ruling on defendant's Sandoval application was not preserved and, therefore, does not present an issue reviewable by this court (see, People v. Shields, 46 N.Y.2d 764, 765, 413 N.Y.S.2d 649, 386 N.E.2d 257). Finally, the argument that defendant's guilty plea should not have been accepted is also not preserved for appellate review because defendant neither moved to withdraw the plea before sentencing nor raised the issue by a motion to vacate the judgment of conviction (People v. Bell, 47 N.Y.2d 839, 840, 418 N.Y.S.2d 584, 392 N.E.2d 570).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fuller v. Schultz
...of K. Fox, Mag. J.); People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665-66, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 (1988); People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 858-59, 487 N.Y.S.2d 318, 476 N.E.2d 644 (1985); People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636, 637, 467 N.Y.S.2d 355, 454 N.E.2d 938 (1983); People v. Bell, 47 N.Y.2d......
-
Snitzel v. Murry
...C.P.L. § 220.60(3) or move to vacate the judgment of conviction under C.P.L. § 440.10. Id. (citing, e.g., People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 487 N.Y.S.2d 318, 476 N.E.2d 644 (1985)). The Appellate Division did not explicitly cite to C.P.L. § 220.60(3), § 440.10 or § 470.05(2), but the case o......
-
Perez v. Miller
...a motion to withdraw the plea under CPL 220.60 (3) or a motion to vacate the judgment of conviction under CPL 440.10"); People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 858-59 (1985) ("the argument that defendant's guilty plea should not have been accepted is also not preserved for appellate review becaus......
-
People v. Williams
...appellate review (see People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160 [1995] ; People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 858–859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 318, 476 N.E.2d 644 [1985] ). In a line of cases beginning with People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 (1988),......