State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel
Decision Date | 28 July 1954 |
Citation | 65 N.W.2d 529,267 Wis. 331 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. THOMSON, Atty. Gen. v. GIESSEL, Director of Budget and Accounts. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
The petitioner Attorney General by his complaint herein seeks: (1) a peremptory writ of mandamus directed to respondent, E. C. Giessel, as director of the state Department of Budget and Accounts, commanding him to honor, audit and approve the voucher presented to him by the State Investment Commission in the amount of $974,499.40 to restore to the State Insurance Fund moneys previously appropriated from said fund by the legislature for the construction of the present State Office Building, which amount represents the unpaid balance on said building, the honoring of said voucher being the first step in the construction and financing of the third unit to the State Office Building, pursuant to sections 14.86 and 14.88, Stats. 1953; (2) for a declaratory judgment adjudging that sections 14.86 and 14.88, Stats.1953, were and are valid enactments, have become and are law and in force, that the proposed steps of financing and constructing the third unit of the State Office Building as described in the complaint are valid and lawful; and (3) that the State Investment Board has the authority to transfer the said loan or any part thereof to the Allstate Insurance Company in fulfillment of a commitment by it to take the same at the option of the Investment Board.
Respondent filed a general demurrer putting in issue the constitutionality of the statutes relied upon and the validity of the acts purported to have been and to be taken pursuant thereto.
Under the provisions of section 13.351, Stats. (created by ch. 563, Laws of 1949), the State Building Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the commission') is entrusted with the power of constructing any new building, or addition to an existing building, for housing state offices, and the assigning of space therein to various state agencies. Such commission is authorized by section 14.86(1), Stats. (created by ch. 604, Laws of 1949) to incorporate a non-profit corporation to be known as the Wisconsin State Public Building Corporation, and pursuant to such authority on or about November 14, 1949, the commission incorporated such a corporation (which will hereinafter be referred to as 'the corporation').
Section 14.86 ( ) further provides:
(Italics supplied.)
The construction of the present state office building consisting of two units was financed in whole or in part through a loan from the state insurance fund, and to secure such loan a deed of trust conveying title to the building and land upon which it is situated (said land also being of ample size to permit the erection of the contemplated addition of a third unit to said building) was executed to the commissioner of insurance under that of December 31, 1931. The balance now due on such loan to the state insurance funds aggregates nearly on million dollars. The 1953 legislature determined to proceed with the erection of the contemplated third unit of the building and to finance the cost of the same, and also to refund the balance due on said existing loan, through the device of leasing the existing building and land to the corporation, and having the corporation borrow the amount needed from the Wisconsin Investment Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the investment board'), such loan to be secured by the corporation's interest in the existing building and land as well as the new structure. To that end the legislature by ch. 168, Laws of 1953, enacted section 14.88, Stats., reading in part as follows:
'(3) In consideration and upon the payment in full of the existing indebtedness on the state office building to the state insurance fund as provided for by sub. (2), the commissioner of insurance shall convey the state office building property to the state.' (Italics supplied.)
Pursuant to section 14.86, Stats., the corporation on April 23, 1954, applied to the investment board for a loan of approximately $4,200,000 to finance the cost of erecting the third unit to the State Office Building and repaying to the insurance fund the balance due on the existing encumbrance. Such application was considered at a regular meeting of the investment board held on such day, and a resolution was thereupon adopted by the board granting the loan application of the corporation contingent upon the agreement hereinafter described being consummated with the Allstate Insurance Company hereinafter referred to as 'Allstate') for the taking over of the loan. Such resolution also directed the commission to present to the respondent Giessel, as director of Budget and Accounts, a voucher in the amount of $974,499.40, payable to the state insurance fund to cover the balance owing upon the existing encumbrance.
Under date of May 1, 1954, an agreement was entered into between the investment board and Allstate whereby the latter agreed to take over said loan commitment upon the terms stated in such agreement subject to the condition that a decision of the Wisconsin supreme court is rendered which establishes to the satisfaction of Allstate 'that all transactions with reference to the acquisition, construction and financing of the state office building project, including the provisions of this commitment, the statutes underlying such transactions and the security to be given securing the loan to be made to the Corporation are valid, subsisting and enforceable in the hands of Allstate.' There was incorporated into such agreement by reference...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority v. Earl
...supra, is also readily distinguishable on its facts. The construction of no facility of any kind was involved. State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel (1954), 267 Wis. 331, 65 N.W.2d 529, involved a private corporation and the construction of a state office building, which itself is not a work of ......
-
State ex rel. La Follette v. Stitt, 83-1502-OA
...are relevant to cases involving issue of public debt in the state context of sec. 4, Art. VIII. In State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel, 267 Wis. 331, 352, 65 N.W.2d 529 (1954) a case involving an issue of state debt under Art. VIII, sec. 4, this court "We deem that the terms 'debt' and 'indebt......
-
City of Pocatello v. Peterson
...v. Woolworth, 361 Pa. 543, 64 A.2d 659 (1949); Bair v. Layton City Corp., 6 Utah 2d 138, 307 P.2d 895 (1957); State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel, 267 Wis. 331, 65 N.W.2d 529 (1954); State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel, 271 Wis. 15, 72 N.W.2d 577 (1955)).2 The language in the bid submitted by the......
-
State ex rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La Plante
...The effect of a lien on property as security for a revenue obligation was further considered by this court in State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel (1954), 267 Wis. 331, 65 N.W.2d 529; Morris v. Ellis (1936), 221 Wis. 307, 266 N.W. Where the purchase price for property to be acquired by a munici......