Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co.
Decision Date | 17 August 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 79-3598,79-3598 |
Citation | 653 F.2d 1273 |
Parties | 26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 815, 63 A.L.R.Fed. 395, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,060 Delia L. FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WYNN OIL COMPANY, a corporation, and Wynn's International, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Michael Maroko, Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, Los Angeles, Cal., Sandra G. Bryan, E. E. O. C., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.
Jeffrey C. Freedman, Goldstein, Freedman & Klepetar, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before FERGUSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and REDDEN, * District Judge.
Fernandez appeals a judgment in favor of her former employer on her claim of sex discrimination. The district court found that the employer's decision not to promote Fernandez was based on her lack of qualifications rather than her sex and was consequently justified by a valid business purpose. Alternatively, it found masculine gender a bona fide occupational qualification since the job sought required dealings with nations that may refuse to transact business with women. The decision is affirmed solely on the former ground.
Wynn Oil Company (Wynn) is an international petro-chemical manufacturer located in Orange County, California. It hired Fernandez in 1968. From 1972 through 1973, Fernandez served as administrative assistant to Louis Dashwood, the vice-president of Wynn's International Operations division.
Dashwood testified, as a witness for Fernandez, that during this time Fernandez performed many functions of his job but he chose not to promote her because she was so valuable to him as an administrative assistant. He also testified that he felt Latin American clients would react negatively to a woman vice-president of International Operations.
Joseph Borrello was subsequently appointed Director of International Operations (DIO). In October 1975, Dashwood's employment terminated and Borrello became vice-president of Worldwide Marketing. Within three days, Borrello informed Fernandez of plans to terminate her administrative assistant position. In March 1976, Borrello hired Arturo Matthews to fill the position of DIO, although Fernandez had requested consideration for the job. In April, Fernandez accepted an assignment as manager of a different division. She was discharged in February 1977.
In January 1978, Fernandez filed a complaint in district court against Wynn Oil Company, alleging that Borrello's refusal to promote her to the position of DIO was an act of sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). Wynn defended on the ground that Fernandez' lack of qualifications for the job, rather than her sex, prompted Borrello's decision. Alternatively, Wynn argued that male sex is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e), for a job performed in foreign countries where women are barred from business.
Following a bench trial, the district court found for Wynn on both alternative grounds. Fernandez claims on appeal that the district court erred in reaching each of its conclusions. Wynn argues that both issues were determined correctly, but requests that we abandon the lower court's discussion of the BFOQ defense because sex was not a factor in Borrello's refusal to promote Fernandez. The American Jewish Congress, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Women's Equal Rights Legal Defense and Education Fund have presented amicus curiae briefs in opposition to the district court's BFOQ determination.
Discrimination cases under Title VII involve two common methods of discriminatory behavior by employers. In disparate treatment cases, the employer "treats people less favorably than others because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, 335 n.15, 97 S.Ct. 1843, 1854 n.15, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977). In disparate impact cases, the employer uses "employment practices that are facially neutral ... but in fact fall more harshly on one group than another ...." Id. The instant appeal falls in the first category.
Under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, a party complaining of discrimination by disparate treatment establishes a prima facie case by showing that (1) she was within a protected group; (2) she applied and was qualified for a job for which the company was seeking applicants; (3) she was rejected; and (4) after her rejection, the employer continued to seek applicants. McDonnell-Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). If a prima facie case is established, the employer bears the burden of demonstrating that it refused the applicant for a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason. Id.
The district court in the instant case found that Fernandez failed to prove a prima facie case because she did not demonstrate that she was qualified for the job as required by factor (2), above. Further, it found that even had Fernandez established a prima facie case, her qualifications compared to Matthews' justified Borrello's hiring decision for sound business reasons. Unless these findings are clearly erroneous, they must not be disturbed on appeal. McLean v. Phillips-Ramsey, Inc., 624 F.2d 70, 71 (9th Cir. 1980).
The record supports the district court's findings. Testimony was presented that Fernandez was not proficient in the English language and had difficulty with articulation. She had no secondary education. Borrello testified that he did not seriously consider Fernandez because she had a drinking problem and erratic work habits. He also testified that she was indiscreet in her criticism of him and in infringing on the job authority of others. Finally, she had refused an assignment to address a group of listeners and there was testimony that she had exhibited poor supervisory and marketing skills.
Fernandez has therefore failed to demonstrate that the district court erred in failing to find her qualified for the DIO position. If an applicant is not qualified for the job in question, she has failed to establish a prima facie case. Morita v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 541 F.2d 217, 219 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. den., 429 U.S. 1050, 97 S.Ct. 761, 50 L.Ed.2d 765 (1977). 1 Congress did not intend the Civil Rights Act to saddle business with unqualified employees. Id.
Furthermore, even if Fernandez had been able to establish a prima facie case, the district court was justified in ruling for Wynn by finding that Wynn had a legitimate, non-discriminatory purpose in preferring to hire Matthews. The record demonstrates that Matthews held a master's degree in business administration and had a prior management record at Wynn in international and domestic markets. He had implemented a highly successful merchandising program in a Wynn industrial division. He had demonstrated skills in management, delegation of work, supervision, and public speaking. Borrello testified that all of these qualities were considered necessary or highly desirable for the DIO position.
An employer's decision may be justified by the hired employee's superior qualifications unless the purported justification is a pretext for invidious discrimination. Ward v. Westland Plastics, Inc., 651 F.2d 1266, 1269 (9th Cir. 1980). The record supports the trial court's finding of Matthews' superior qualifications. It does not show that Fernandez countered this justification with proof of pretext.
We hold that the district court was not clearly in error in finding, first, that Fernandez was unqualified and had accordingly failed to allege a prima facie case and, second, that sound business practice justified Borrello's decision to hire Matthews.
The district court found masculine gender a bona fide occupational qualification for the position in question. It based...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gay v. Waiters' and Dairy Lunchmen's Union, Local No. 30
...Hagans v. Andrus, 651 F.2d 622 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 859, 102 S.Ct. 313, 70 L.Ed.2d 157 (1981); Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1981). These factual findings include the four McDonnell Douglas elements themselves, which are, after all, factual determinations.......
-
Torres v. Wisconsin Dept. of Health and Social Services, 86-2161
...involves just such a claim. Consequently, we are not dealing here with a mere matter of "consumer preference." See Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir.1981); Diaz v. Pan Am. World Airways, 442 F.2d 385, 389 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 950, 92 S.Ct. 275, 30 L.Ed.2d 267 (......
-
Boureslan v. Aramco
...344 U.S. at 280, 73 S.Ct. at 252 (no conflict where Mexican registration of trademark had been cancelled); see also Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir.1981) (alleged chauvinism of South American businessmen should not provide basis for holding that being male was BFOQ); Note,......
-
Gerdom v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
...discrimination cannot be upheld on the basis of customer preferences unrelated to abilities to perform the job. Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir.1981). It has long been established in the airline industry that passengers' preference for attendants who conform to a ......
-
Department Of The Army Found To Have Discriminated Against Transgender Employee
...another employee reinforces the very stereotypes and biases that Title VII is intended to overcome. See, e.g., Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 176-77 (9th Cir. 1981)(finding discrimination when female employee fired because employer's foreign clients would only work with male empl......
-
How Does The Supreme Court's Affirmation Action Rulings Affect Employer DEI Initiatives?
...to perform the job has never been a lawful justification for discrimination under Title VII. See, e.g., Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. 9. For example, earlier this year at least one think tank has recently asked the EEOC to open a civil rights investigation rela......
-
Ten Troubles with Title VII and Trait Discrimination Plus One Simple Solution (A totality of the Circumstances Framework)
...requirements may be validated as a BFOQ). 415 Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989). 416 See Cruz, supra note 207, at 244. 417 653 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1981). 418 Id. at 1276. 1028 CAPITAL UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [37:965 country’s gender bias. 419 The Court rejected customer prefere......
-
Appearance based hiring: the 'bona fide occupational qualification' carveout, exploring hooters of America and Air India v. Nargesh Meerza
...and construed the same somewhat narrowly, to determine whether or not the argument has merit. 142 133. 134. Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1274 (9th Cir. 1981). 135. Id. at 1276. 136. Id. at 1274. 137. Id. at 1276. 138. Id. at 1277; Janice R. Bellace, The International Dimension ......
-
Who Wears the Pants? Everyone Who Wants To: Expanding Price Waterhouse Sex Stereotyping to Cover Employer-mandated Sex-differentiated Dress and Grooming Codes in the Eighth Circuit
...Gerdom v. Cont'l Airlines, Inc., 692 F.2d 602, 609 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. dismissed, 460 U.S. 1074 (1983); Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. [170]Id. at 1215. [171]Id. [172]Id. (quoting Knott v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 527 F.2d 1249, 1251 (8th Cir. 1975)). [173]Id. [174......
-
Market discrimination and groups.
...Law, and a Jurisprudence for the Last Reconstruction, 100 YALE L.J. 1329 (1991). (25.) See, e.g., Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. (26.) KELMAN & LESTER, supra note 4, at 204. (27.) Seen from this viewpoint, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), is......