U.S. v. Haydel, 80-3254
| Decision Date | 17 December 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-3254,80-3254 |
| Citation | 664 F.2d 84 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John M. HAYDEL, Jr., a/k/a "Ice Cream" and "Mugsy", Defendant-Appellant. . Unit A * |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana; John V. Parker, Judge.
Virgil M. Wheeler, Jr., New Orleans, La., Herbert Shafer, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
C. Michael Hill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion July 8, 5 Cir., 1981, 649 F.2d 1152).
Before SKELTON **, Senior Judge, RUBIN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.
The opinion is corrected so that the last paragraph before Part I of the opinion reads as follows:
With this correction, the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge of this Administrative Unit in regular active service having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16; Fifth Circuit Judicial Council Resolution of January 14, 1981), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
* Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(1) of Public Law 96-452-October 14, 1980.
** Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Crisp
...curiam); United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152, 1154-55 (5th Cir. Unit A July 1981), modified, in part, on other grounds, 664 F.2d 84, 85 (5th Cir. Unit A Dec.1981). For example, the right to exclude others is one important factor. See Brown, 743 F.2d at 1507. Other factors to be considere......
-
U.S. v. Wuagneux
...States v. Thompson, 495 F.2d 165, 169-70, 170 n.4 (D.C.Cir.1974). In United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir.), corrected, 664 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1721, 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982), for example, we held that an ambiguity in a warrant may be clar......
-
United States v. Williams
...them from being freely accessible to other people. See, e.g., United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152, 1154-55 (5th Cir.), corrected, 664 F.2d 84 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022, 102 S.Ct. 1721, 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); Wilson v. Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County, 620 F.2d 1201, 120......
-
U.S. v. Conner
...that the defendant possessed a legitimate expectation of privacy in his parents' home), corrected on reh'g on other grounds, 664 F.2d 84 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022, 102 S.Ct. 1721, 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); and compare Gomez, 16 F.3d at 256 (holding that a defendant did not ha......