Jackson Court Condominiums v. City of New Orleans
Decision Date | 20 July 1987 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 84-3466. |
Citation | 665 F. Supp. 1235 |
Parties | JACKSON COURT CONDOMINIUMS, INC. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana |
Warren A. Goldstein, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff.
Salvador Anzelmo, City Atty., New Orleans, La., for defendant.
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the court is the Motion of Defendant, City of New Orleans ("City"), for Summary Judgment and/or to Dismiss. Plaintiff, Jackson Court Condominiums, Inc. ("Jackson Court"), opposes the Motion. The Motion, set for hearing on May 6, 1987, was taken under advisement on briefs without oral argument. In the instant suit, Jackson Court seeks damages and attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This suit arises out of the City's enactment of a timesharing moratorium ordinance and the City's denial of Jackson Court's request for a waiver from the provisions of that ordinance.
As one district court judge aptly noted some twenty years ago, "The instant action is of a type increasingly more common, in which citizens feel themselves aggrieved by some action of local government officials and come to the Federal Court under the Civil Rights Act believing, more emotionally than rationally, that they must be entitled to a remedy here." Love v. Navarro, 262 F.Supp. 520, 521 (C.D.Cal.1967). This is just such an action, and for the reasons set out below, the court finds, as a matter of law, that Jackson Court has failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and as such, the instant action must be dismissed.
A reading of the Complaint, the Amended Complaint and the parties' Statements of Uncontested Material facts discloses the following undisputed facts:
Jackson Court purchased a 21-unit apartment building located at 1207 Jackson Avenue in New Orleans on August 15, 1981 for $650,000.00 for the purpose of developing a timeshare condominium project. Prior to the adoption of Ordinance 8344 M.C.S. timesharing among co-owners of immovable property would have been permitted on Jackson Court's property which was located in an "RM-2" zoning district.
On October 22, 1981, the Council of the City of New Orleans ("The Council") adopted Ordinance 8344 M.C.S., establishing a temporary city-wide moratorium on timeshare plans in zoning districts designated, among others, RM-2. The Minutes of the City Council meeting of October 1, 1981, published in the Times-Picayune/States-Item of October 22, 1981, contained a statement of the introduction of a calendar item described by reciting its title. This calendar item was adopted as Ordinance 8344 M.C.S. later on October 22, 1981. No other notice of hearing for the proposed Ordinance was ever published.
Ordinance 8344 provided that upon notice to the Council, any person aggrieved by the Ordinance could seek a waiver or exception upon a showing that the petitioner would experience undue hardship and that the proposed project would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Other timesharing moratorium ordinances applying to particular areas of the city, e.g., the French Quarter and the Faubourg Marigny, also had waiver provisions. On March 31, 1982, five months after adoption of Ordinance 8344, Jackson Court requested a hearing before the City Council for a waiver of the restrictions of Ordinance 8344 with respect to its project. On April 15, 1982, after a hearing before the City Council, Jackson Court's waiver request was denied. All previous requests for waivers under the various timeshare moratoria had been approved by the Council.
The facts surrounding the April 15, 1982 hearing are disputed. For purposes of this Motion, the court accepts as true Jackson Court's allegations concerning the April 15 hearing as follows:
On April 14, 1982, the day before Jackson Court's hearing before the City Council, Jackson Court filed with the Custodian of Notarial Records for the Parish of Orleans, a Condominium Declaration relative to the Jackson Avenue property which contained provisions for timesharing of individual units among co-owners. On that same day, Jackson Court filed its registration of the proposed condominium timeshare plan with the New Orleans Department of Safety and Permits. Jackson Court's registration was rejected by letter dated May 17, 1982, of Paul May, the City's Zoning Administrator.
The events surrounding the various timeshare moratoria did not take place in a vacuum. Zoning Docket 42/81, initiated by City Council Motion on May 28, 1981, prior to Jackson Court's purchase of the Jackson Avenue property, proposed comprehensive amendments to the City's Comprehensive Zoning Law regarding timesharing, including a total ban on timesharing in the RM-1 and RM-2 zoning districts. A public hearing on Zoning Docket 42/81 was held before the City Planning Commission on August 5, 1981 pursuant to notices published in the Times-Picayune/States-Item on July 15, 22, and 29, 1981. And similarly, Zoning Docket 71/82, initiated by City Council Motion on September 24, 1981, like Zoning Docket 42/81, proposed comprehensive amendments to the City's Comprehensive Zoning Law regarding timesharing, including a total ban on timesharing in RM-1 and RM-2 zoning districts. A public hearing on Zoning Docket 71/82 was held before the City Planning Commission on November 4, 1981 pursuant to notices published in the Times-Picayune/States-Item on October 14, 21 and 28, 1981.1
Jackson Court, in its Statement of Uncontested Material Facts, adopted its Stipulation of Facts from the previous state court litigation.2 Stipulation number 21 provides in part as follows:
The results of the City Planning Commission study lead to the conclusion that the key characteristic of timeshare plans is that they are transient facilities, similar to hotels, and that thus they should not be permitted anywhere a city would not permit hotels or motels.... A characteristic of transients is that they do not have a sense of belonging to the neighborhood, and thus no neighborhood pride and commitment; such transient attitudes can produce effects such as loudness, carelessness, littering and vandalism.... The CPC study further indicated that the New Orleans housing market is in a state where available rental units are in high demand because of low supply and that recent conversions of apartment buildings to condominiums is partially responsible for the poor rental supply....
The end result of Zoning Docket 71/82 was Ordinance 8585 M.C.S. which effected a permanent total ban on timesharing in certain zoning districts (including RM-1 and RM-2 districts) and triggered the dissolution of the various timesharing moratoria including Ordinance 8344. Ordinance 8585 was adopted by the City Council on April 22, 1982 and became effective on April 23, 1982.
Thereafter, Jackson Court sought injunctive and declaratory relief in Louisiana state courts. The trial court rendered judgment against Jackson Court. The Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal dismissed Jackson Court's appeal as moot because creditors had foreclosed on Jackson Court's property. Thus, the court could not grant the relief Jackson Court sought. The Court of Appeals did not review the trial court's judgment on the merits. The Louisiana Supreme Court denied writs and the instant suit followed shortly thereafter.
Early in this litigation, the City filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based primarily on the contention that the state court judgment precluded the instant suit under the doctrine of res judicata. Another section of this court granted the City's Motion based only on the res judicata issue. Jackson Court appealed this ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals which reversed the district court and held that the doctrine of res judicata did not bar the instant suit. After remand, the case was transferred to this section of the court. The City now reurges its alternative grounds for Summary Judgment or Dismissal.
Jackson Court asserts several claims under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The gist of Plaintiff's claims is that the City, through the City Council, acting under color of state law, deprived Jackson Court of its rights, privileges or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and that this deprivation caused Jackson Court to suffer the loss of its Jackson Avenue property. Jackson Court alleges roughly nine supposed constitutional violations:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Molamphy v. Town of Southern Pines, No. 1:02CV00720 (M.D.N.C. 3/3/2004)
...must be followed. Id. at 897. Even a specific zoning decision can constitute a legislative act. Jackson Court Condominiums, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 665 F. Supp. 1235, 1244 (E.D. La. 1987), aff'd, 874 F.2d 1070 (5th Cir. 1989), citing, Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 4......
-
Eller Media Co. v. Montgomery County
...plaintiff sought damages for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of the repealed ordinance.); Jackson Court Condominiums v. City of New Orleans, 665 F.Supp. 1235, 1240 (E.D.La.1987), aff'd, 874 F.2d 1070 (5th Cir.1989) (plaintiff, who sought monetary damages for deprivation of its right......
-
Town of Sunnyvale v. Mayhew
...that people of common intelligence must guess at its meaning and differ as to its application. See Jackson Court Condominiums v. City of New Orleans, 665 F.Supp. 1235, 1242 (E.D.La.1987), aff'd, 874 F.2d 1070 (5th Cir.1989). The fact that the Town must exercise discretion in granting varian......
-
Adair v. Bell, Civil Action No. 3:93cv132-D-D (N.D. Miss. 1995), Civil Action No. 3:93cv132-D-D.
...488 (5th Cir. 1986); Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital Dist., 778 F.2d 1052, 1056 (5th Cir. 1985); Jackson Court Condominiums, Inc. v. New Orleans, 665 F.Supp. 1235, 1241 (E.D. La. 1987). "The right to have state (or city) laws obeyed is a state, not a federal, right." Jackson Court, 665 F.S......