667 Fed.Appx. 972 (9th Cir. 2016), 15-55462, Gibbs v. Hernandez

Docket Nº:15-55462
Citation:667 Fed.Appx. 972
Party Name:BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. HERNANDEZ, Officer, individual & official capacity, Defendant-Appellee
Attorney:BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Beaumont, TX. For A. MATEVOUSIAN, Assistant Warden, individual & official capacity, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of Bureau of Prison (BOP), individual & official capacity, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Institutional Warden - USP Victorville, inidividual ...
Judge Panel:Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:August 04, 2016
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 972

667 Fed.Appx. 972 (9th Cir. 2016)

BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

C. HERNANDEZ, Officer, individual & official capacity, Defendant-Appellee

No. 15-55462

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

August 4, 2016

Submitted July 26, 2016 [**]

Editorial Note:

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. 5:13-cv-00382-CAS-KK. Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding.

BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Beaumont, TX.

For A. MATEVOUSIAN, Assistant Warden, individual & official capacity, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of Bureau of Prison (BOP), individual & official capacity, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Institutional Warden - USP Victorville, inidividual & official capacity, Defendants - Appellees: Thomas Kirby Buck, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USLA - Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA.

For C. HERNANDEZ, Officer, individual & official capacity, Defendant - Appellee: Thomas Kirby Buck, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USLA - Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA; Marsha Michiko Yasuda, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Los Angeles, CA.

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM [*]

Benjamin Gibbs, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging constitutional violations in connection with a contraband search. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Sch. Dist. No. 1J,

Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gibbs's motion for reconsideration because Gibbs failed to set forth any grounds for relief. See

id. at...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP