United States v. Amy Unknown (In re Amy Unknown)
Decision Date | 25 January 2012 |
Docket Number | Nos. 09–41238,09–41254.,s. 09–41238 |
Citation | 668 F.3d 776 |
Parties | In re Amy UNKNOWN, Petitioner.United States of America, Plaintiff–Appellee,Doyle Randall Paroline, Defendant–Appellee, v. Amy Unknown, Movant–Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
James R. Marsh, Marsh Law Firm, White Plains, NY, Paul G. Cassell (argued), University of Utah School of Law, Salt Lake City, UT, for Petitioner.
Stanley G. Schneider, Schneider & McKinney, P.C., Houston, TX, Fred Rimes Files, Jr. (argued), Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain & Harrison, Tyler, TX, for Defendant–Respondent.
Amanda Louise Griffith, Asst. U.S. Atty., Plano, TX, Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, William D. Baldwin, Traci Lynne Kenner (argued), Asst. U.S. Attys., Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff–Respondent.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Leonard E. Davis, Chief Judge.ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC(Opinion–Order Dec. 21, 2009, 5th Cir., 2009, 591 F.3d 792) (09–41238 only)(Revised Opinion–Order Dec. 22, 2009, 5th Cir., 2009, 591 F.3d 792)(Opinion March 22, 2011, 5th Cir., 2011, 636 F.3d 190)Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.1PER CURIAM:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
1. Judge Stephen A. Higginson is recused and did not participate in this decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial